Exploring the impact of park features and visitors’ socioeconomic status on park visitation: A case study of Austin, Texas

IF 3.6 3区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Yizhen Ding , Yang Song , Zhicheng Xu
{"title":"Exploring the impact of park features and visitors’ socioeconomic status on park visitation: A case study of Austin, Texas","authors":"Yizhen Ding ,&nbsp;Yang Song ,&nbsp;Zhicheng Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jort.2025.100877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban parks offer significant environmental, social, and economic benefits, and understanding the factors that influence park usage is crucial to maximizing these benefits. Previous research has established that park visitation is associated with park features (e.g. vegetation, access to park, park amenities). However, there is a limited body of research on the relationship between specific park attributes and park usage among different demographics and income groups. To address this research gap, we took Austin, Texas as our study site, and utilized longitudinal individual-level and location-based big data (SafeGraph) to examine how park features, involving park characteristics (i.e. size, age), park natural features (i.e. tree canopy, water), and facilities, influence park usage across demographics and income groups. Our research reveals several key factors that influence park visitation. Median household income, distance to the park, the percentage of married couple households in the block group, and the percentage of people working from home are negatively associated with park visitation. Conversely, the percentage of males, median age, the percentage of children, and the percentage of the population owning houses are positively associated with park visitation. Additionally, we examined the various preferences towards park features across different income groups. The low-income group prefers parks that are newer, with water features, and with swimming pools. Tree canopy is a positive predictor for visitation among the low-income group at the p &lt; 0.1 level. The middle-income group favors parks with scenic viewpoints but not parks with sports facilities. The high-income group is more likely to visit parks with water features. These findings provide valuable insights into how demographic groups prefer park visitation and how park characteristics that may encourage park visitation among different income groups, and they can help guide urban planners, designers, and policymakers in the allocation of parks with specific features to benefit different demographic groups urban residents to the greatest extent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100877"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078025000234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban parks offer significant environmental, social, and economic benefits, and understanding the factors that influence park usage is crucial to maximizing these benefits. Previous research has established that park visitation is associated with park features (e.g. vegetation, access to park, park amenities). However, there is a limited body of research on the relationship between specific park attributes and park usage among different demographics and income groups. To address this research gap, we took Austin, Texas as our study site, and utilized longitudinal individual-level and location-based big data (SafeGraph) to examine how park features, involving park characteristics (i.e. size, age), park natural features (i.e. tree canopy, water), and facilities, influence park usage across demographics and income groups. Our research reveals several key factors that influence park visitation. Median household income, distance to the park, the percentage of married couple households in the block group, and the percentage of people working from home are negatively associated with park visitation. Conversely, the percentage of males, median age, the percentage of children, and the percentage of the population owning houses are positively associated with park visitation. Additionally, we examined the various preferences towards park features across different income groups. The low-income group prefers parks that are newer, with water features, and with swimming pools. Tree canopy is a positive predictor for visitation among the low-income group at the p < 0.1 level. The middle-income group favors parks with scenic viewpoints but not parks with sports facilities. The high-income group is more likely to visit parks with water features. These findings provide valuable insights into how demographic groups prefer park visitation and how park characteristics that may encourage park visitation among different income groups, and they can help guide urban planners, designers, and policymakers in the allocation of parks with specific features to benefit different demographic groups urban residents to the greatest extent.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism offers a dedicated outlet for research relevant to social sciences and natural resources. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research on all aspects of outdoor recreation planning and management, covering the entire spectrum of settings from wilderness to urban outdoor recreation opportunities. It also focuses on new products and findings in nature based tourism and park management. JORT is an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary journal, articles may focus on any aspect of theory, method, or concept of outdoor recreation research, planning or management, and interdisciplinary work is especially welcome, and may be of a theoretical and/or a case study nature. Depending on the topic of investigation, articles may be positioned within one academic discipline, or draw from several disciplines in an integrative manner, with overarching relevance to social sciences and natural resources. JORT is international in scope and attracts scholars from all reaches of the world to facilitate the exchange of ideas. As such, the journal enhances understanding of scientific knowledge, empirical results, and practitioners'' needs. Therefore in JORT each article is accompanied by an executive summary, written by the editors or authors, highlighting the planning and management relevant aspects of the article.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信