Marcela D. Radtke Ph.D. , June M. Tester M.D. , Lan Xiao Ph.D. , Wei-ting Chen Ph.D. , Benjamin O. Emmert-Aronson Ph.D. , Elizabeth A. Markle Ph.D. , Steven Chen M.D. , Lisa G. Rosas Ph.D., M.P.H.
{"title":"Impact of a multicomponent food-as-medicine intervention on behavioral and mental health outcomes for patients with and without food insecurity","authors":"Marcela D. Radtke Ph.D. , June M. Tester M.D. , Lan Xiao Ph.D. , Wei-ting Chen Ph.D. , Benjamin O. Emmert-Aronson Ph.D. , Elizabeth A. Markle Ph.D. , Steven Chen M.D. , Lisa G. Rosas Ph.D., M.P.H.","doi":"10.1016/j.nut.2025.112734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Increasingly, food-as-medicine (FAM) programs are being implemented as a strategy for improving the health of patients. However, current policies limit nutrition resources to patients with specific chronic condition diagnoses and do not include food insecurity as a qualifying condition.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Explore the impact of Recipe4Health (R4H), a multicomponent FAM intervention, on behavioral and mental health outcomes in patients with and without food insecurity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients (n = 336) with diet-related chronic conditions and/or food insecurity were referred to R4H, which included 16-weekly produce deliveries and behavioral intervention sessions. Food security status was assessed using the U.S. Department of Agriculture 6-item survey. Outcomes included vegetable/fruit intake, physical activity (PA) and mental health. Within- and between-group pre-post changes were assessed using repeated-measures linear mixed-effects models, adjusting for baseline.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The majority of patients had one or more chronic conditions (96%) and identified as food insecure (62%). Patients with food insecurity experienced significant increases in daily servings of vegetables/fruit (+0.38 ± 0.15; <em>P</em> = 0.01) and minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA per week (+28.94 ± 9.84; <em>P</em> < 0.01). Patients with food security did not experience significant increases in vegetables/fruit (<em>P</em> = 0.09) or PA (<em>P</em> = 0.06). Food-insecure and food-secure patients both experienced significant improvements in loneliness, anxiety, and depressive symptoms from baseline (<em>P</em> < 0.01 for all). Between-group differences were observed only for anxiety, where patients with food security experienced significant improvements in anxious symptoms compared to food-insecure patients (–1.24 [–2.33, –0.14]; <em>P</em> = 0.03).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Policymakers may consider expanding eligibility criteria to include food insecurity as an independent qualifying condition for FAM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19482,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 112734"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899900725000528","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Increasingly, food-as-medicine (FAM) programs are being implemented as a strategy for improving the health of patients. However, current policies limit nutrition resources to patients with specific chronic condition diagnoses and do not include food insecurity as a qualifying condition.
Objective
Explore the impact of Recipe4Health (R4H), a multicomponent FAM intervention, on behavioral and mental health outcomes in patients with and without food insecurity.
Methods
Patients (n = 336) with diet-related chronic conditions and/or food insecurity were referred to R4H, which included 16-weekly produce deliveries and behavioral intervention sessions. Food security status was assessed using the U.S. Department of Agriculture 6-item survey. Outcomes included vegetable/fruit intake, physical activity (PA) and mental health. Within- and between-group pre-post changes were assessed using repeated-measures linear mixed-effects models, adjusting for baseline.
Results
The majority of patients had one or more chronic conditions (96%) and identified as food insecure (62%). Patients with food insecurity experienced significant increases in daily servings of vegetables/fruit (+0.38 ± 0.15; P = 0.01) and minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA per week (+28.94 ± 9.84; P < 0.01). Patients with food security did not experience significant increases in vegetables/fruit (P = 0.09) or PA (P = 0.06). Food-insecure and food-secure patients both experienced significant improvements in loneliness, anxiety, and depressive symptoms from baseline (P < 0.01 for all). Between-group differences were observed only for anxiety, where patients with food security experienced significant improvements in anxious symptoms compared to food-insecure patients (–1.24 [–2.33, –0.14]; P = 0.03).
Conclusion
Policymakers may consider expanding eligibility criteria to include food insecurity as an independent qualifying condition for FAM.
期刊介绍:
Nutrition has an open access mirror journal Nutrition: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
Founded by Michael M. Meguid in the early 1980''s, Nutrition presents advances in nutrition research and science, informs its readers on new and advancing technologies and data in clinical nutrition practice, encourages the application of outcomes research and meta-analyses to problems in patient-related nutrition; and seeks to help clarify and set the research, policy and practice agenda for nutrition science to enhance human well-being in the years ahead.