{"title":"Income inequality, poverty, and trade liberalization: Evidence from the Vietnam–Us Bilateral Trade Agreement","authors":"Nguyet Anh Ngo, Hanol Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.rie.2025.101054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how tariff reductions, introduced by the Vietnam–US Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), shaped patterns of income inequality and poverty in Vietnam from 2002 to 2018. Using a province-level dataset derived from the Vietnam Household Living Standards Survey and corresponding tariff measures, the analysis focuses on the P80/P20 ratio for income inequality and the poverty headcount ratio as key outcomes. The findings indicate that while overall poverty rates declined substantially following the BTA, particularly in more industrialized regions such as the Red River Delta and the Southeast, the effects on income inequality were not uniform. In certain areas, notably the Mekong River Delta, reliance on agriculture and limited diversification may have left households vulnerable to global price fluctuations, offsetting the potential gains from enhanced market access. Conversely, regions with robust infrastructure, diverse industrial bases, and higher foreign direct investment witnessed a more pronounced drop in both income inequality and poverty. These results underscore the importance of regional characteristics, including sector composition and connectivity, in determining the distributional consequences of trade liberalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46094,"journal":{"name":"Research in Economics","volume":"79 3","pages":"Article 101054"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944325000316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates how tariff reductions, introduced by the Vietnam–US Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), shaped patterns of income inequality and poverty in Vietnam from 2002 to 2018. Using a province-level dataset derived from the Vietnam Household Living Standards Survey and corresponding tariff measures, the analysis focuses on the P80/P20 ratio for income inequality and the poverty headcount ratio as key outcomes. The findings indicate that while overall poverty rates declined substantially following the BTA, particularly in more industrialized regions such as the Red River Delta and the Southeast, the effects on income inequality were not uniform. In certain areas, notably the Mekong River Delta, reliance on agriculture and limited diversification may have left households vulnerable to global price fluctuations, offsetting the potential gains from enhanced market access. Conversely, regions with robust infrastructure, diverse industrial bases, and higher foreign direct investment witnessed a more pronounced drop in both income inequality and poverty. These results underscore the importance of regional characteristics, including sector composition and connectivity, in determining the distributional consequences of trade liberalization.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1947, Research in Economics is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in the world and the main one among those based in Italy. The purpose of the journal is to select original theoretical and empirical articles that will have high impact on the debate in the social sciences; since 1947, it has published important research contributions on a wide range of topics. A summary of our editorial policy is this: the editors make a preliminary assessment of whether the results of a paper, if correct, are worth publishing. If so one of the associate editors reviews the paper: from the reviewer we expect to learn if the paper is understandable and coherent and - within reasonable bounds - the results are correct. We believe that long lags in publication and multiple demands for revision simply slow scientific progress. Our goal is to provide you a definitive answer within one month of submission. We give the editors one week to judge the overall contribution and if acceptable send your paper to an associate editor. We expect the associate editor to provide a more detailed evaluation within three weeks so that the editors can make a final decision before the month expires. In the (rare) case of a revision we allow four months and in the case of conditional acceptance we allow two months to submit the final version. In both cases we expect a cover letter explaining how you met the requirements. For conditional acceptance the editors will verify that the requirements were met. In the case of revision the original associate editor will do so. If the revision cannot be at least conditionally accepted it is rejected: there is no second revision.