{"title":"The Interplay of Endosomal Escape and RNA Release from Polymeric Nanoparticles","authors":"Timothy H. Cheung, and , Molly S. Shoichet*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c0517610.1021/acs.langmuir.4c05176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Ribonucleic acid (RNA) nanocarriers, specifically lipid nanoparticles and polymeric nanoparticles, enable RNA transfection both <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>; however, only a small percentage of RNA endocytosed by a cell is delivered to the cytosolic machinery, minimizing its effect. RNA nanocarriers face two major obstacles after endocytosis: endosomal escape and RNA release. Overcoming both obstacles simultaneously is challenging because endosomal escape is usually achieved by using high positive charge to disrupt the endosomal membrane. However, this high positive charge typically also inhibits RNA release because anionic RNA is strongly bound to the nanocarrier by electrostatic interactions. Many nanocarriers address one over the other despite a growing body of evidence demonstrating that both are crucial for RNA transfection. In this review, we survey the various strategies that have been employed to accomplish both endosomal escape and RNA release with a focus on polymeric nanomaterials. We first consider the various requirements a nanocarrier must achieve for RNA delivery including protection from degradation, cellular internalization, endosomal escape, and RNA release. We then discuss current polymers used for RNA delivery and examine the strategies for achieving both endosomal escape and RNA release. Finally, we review various stimuli-responsive strategies for RNA release. While RNA release continues to be a challenge in achieving efficient RNA transfection, many new innovations in polymeric materials have elucidated promising strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50,"journal":{"name":"Langmuir","volume":"41 11","pages":"7174–7190 7174–7190"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langmuir","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c05176","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ribonucleic acid (RNA) nanocarriers, specifically lipid nanoparticles and polymeric nanoparticles, enable RNA transfection both in vitro and in vivo; however, only a small percentage of RNA endocytosed by a cell is delivered to the cytosolic machinery, minimizing its effect. RNA nanocarriers face two major obstacles after endocytosis: endosomal escape and RNA release. Overcoming both obstacles simultaneously is challenging because endosomal escape is usually achieved by using high positive charge to disrupt the endosomal membrane. However, this high positive charge typically also inhibits RNA release because anionic RNA is strongly bound to the nanocarrier by electrostatic interactions. Many nanocarriers address one over the other despite a growing body of evidence demonstrating that both are crucial for RNA transfection. In this review, we survey the various strategies that have been employed to accomplish both endosomal escape and RNA release with a focus on polymeric nanomaterials. We first consider the various requirements a nanocarrier must achieve for RNA delivery including protection from degradation, cellular internalization, endosomal escape, and RNA release. We then discuss current polymers used for RNA delivery and examine the strategies for achieving both endosomal escape and RNA release. Finally, we review various stimuli-responsive strategies for RNA release. While RNA release continues to be a challenge in achieving efficient RNA transfection, many new innovations in polymeric materials have elucidated promising strategies.
期刊介绍:
Langmuir is an interdisciplinary journal publishing articles in the following subject categories:
Colloids: surfactants and self-assembly, dispersions, emulsions, foams
Interfaces: adsorption, reactions, films, forces
Biological Interfaces: biocolloids, biomolecular and biomimetic materials
Materials: nano- and mesostructured materials, polymers, gels, liquid crystals
Electrochemistry: interfacial charge transfer, charge transport, electrocatalysis, electrokinetic phenomena, bioelectrochemistry
Devices and Applications: sensors, fluidics, patterning, catalysis, photonic crystals
However, when high-impact, original work is submitted that does not fit within the above categories, decisions to accept or decline such papers will be based on one criteria: What Would Irving Do?
Langmuir ranks #2 in citations out of 136 journals in the category of Physical Chemistry with 113,157 total citations. The journal received an Impact Factor of 4.384*.
This journal is also indexed in the categories of Materials Science (ranked #1) and Multidisciplinary Chemistry (ranked #5).