Understanding the performance of three 1-D lake models in simulating thermal dynamics of diverse water bodies in the Yangtze River Basin

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Omarjan Obulkasim , Shulei Zhang , Xiaofan Yang , Lei Sun , Yuan He , Yongjiu Dai
{"title":"Understanding the performance of three 1-D lake models in simulating thermal dynamics of diverse water bodies in the Yangtze River Basin","authors":"Omarjan Obulkasim ,&nbsp;Shulei Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaofan Yang ,&nbsp;Lei Sun ,&nbsp;Yuan He ,&nbsp;Yongjiu Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the thermal processes of lakes and reservoirs is essential due to their profound influence on local climate and environment, as well as their sensitivity to climate change and human activities. This study aims to systematically compare the performance of three one-dimensional lake models (FLake, CoLM-Lake, and Simstrat) in simulating the thermal dynamics of different water bodies in the Yangtze River Basin, which contains the highest water bodies density in China. The results showed that while all models performed well for shallow water bodies, significant challenges and variability emerged for deep water bodies, with Simstrat outperforming CoLM-Lake and FLake in capturing thermal structure. Specifically, Simstrat demonstrated superior performance in simulating the vertical layering of water caused by differences in temperature and density (i.e., thermal stratification) in Lake Qiandaohu (RMSE: 1.44 °C) and surface temperatures across deep water bodies (average RMSE: 2.16 °C). CoLM-Lake effectively reproduced surface temperatures in deep water bodies (average RMSE: 2.36 °C) but overestimated vertical mixing, leading to less accurate stratification simulations (RMSE: 3.16 °C). FLake exhibited limitations in simulating temperatures and thermal stratification in deep water bodies but performed relatively well in shallow systems. Moreover, all three models exhibited diminished accuracy in reservoirs simulations compared to lakes, possibly due to inadequate representation of key processes. Additionally, we explored the impacts of different surface flux schemes and parameter calibration strategies on model performance. This study offers crucial insights into enhancing the simulation of thermal processes in lakes and reservoirs, particularly for deep-water environments, thereby advancing our understanding of thermal dynamics and their implications across the Yangtze River Basin.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"657 ","pages":"Article 133094"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425004329","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the thermal processes of lakes and reservoirs is essential due to their profound influence on local climate and environment, as well as their sensitivity to climate change and human activities. This study aims to systematically compare the performance of three one-dimensional lake models (FLake, CoLM-Lake, and Simstrat) in simulating the thermal dynamics of different water bodies in the Yangtze River Basin, which contains the highest water bodies density in China. The results showed that while all models performed well for shallow water bodies, significant challenges and variability emerged for deep water bodies, with Simstrat outperforming CoLM-Lake and FLake in capturing thermal structure. Specifically, Simstrat demonstrated superior performance in simulating the vertical layering of water caused by differences in temperature and density (i.e., thermal stratification) in Lake Qiandaohu (RMSE: 1.44 °C) and surface temperatures across deep water bodies (average RMSE: 2.16 °C). CoLM-Lake effectively reproduced surface temperatures in deep water bodies (average RMSE: 2.36 °C) but overestimated vertical mixing, leading to less accurate stratification simulations (RMSE: 3.16 °C). FLake exhibited limitations in simulating temperatures and thermal stratification in deep water bodies but performed relatively well in shallow systems. Moreover, all three models exhibited diminished accuracy in reservoirs simulations compared to lakes, possibly due to inadequate representation of key processes. Additionally, we explored the impacts of different surface flux schemes and parameter calibration strategies on model performance. This study offers crucial insights into enhancing the simulation of thermal processes in lakes and reservoirs, particularly for deep-water environments, thereby advancing our understanding of thermal dynamics and their implications across the Yangtze River Basin.
由于湖泊和水库对当地气候和环境的深刻影响,以及对气候变化和人类活动的敏感性,了解湖泊和水库的热过程至关重要。本研究旨在系统比较三种一维湖泊模型(FLake、CoLM-Lake 和 Simstrat)在模拟中国水体密度最高的长江流域不同水体的热动力学过程中的性能。结果表明,虽然所有模型在模拟浅层水体时都表现良好,但在模拟深层水体时却面临着巨大的挑战和差异,其中 Simstrat 在捕捉热结构方面的表现优于 CoLM-Lake 和 FLake。具体而言,Simstrat 在模拟千岛湖温度和密度差异造成的水体垂直分层(即热分层)(均方根误差:1.44 °C)和深水水体表面温度(平均均方根误差:2.16 °C)方面表现出色。CoLM-Lake 有效地再现了深层水体的表层温度(平均均方根误差:2.36 °C),但高估了垂直混合,导致分层模拟不够准确(均方根误差:3.16 °C)。FLake 在模拟深层水体的温度和热分层方面有局限性,但在浅水系统中表现相对较好。此外,与湖泊相比,所有三种模式在水库模拟中的准确性都有所下降,这可能是由于对关键过程的表述不够充分。此外,我们还探讨了不同表面通量方案和参数校准策略对模型性能的影响。这项研究为加强湖泊和水库的热过程模拟,尤其是深水环境的热过程模拟提供了重要见解,从而推进了我们对整个长江流域热动力学及其影响的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信