Enhancing daily runoff prediction: A hybrid model combining GR6J-CemaNeige with wavelet-based gradient boosting technique

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Babak Mohammadi , Mingjie Chen , Mohammad Reza Nikoo , Ali Al-Maktoumi , Yang Yu , Ruide Yu
{"title":"Enhancing daily runoff prediction: A hybrid model combining GR6J-CemaNeige with wavelet-based gradient boosting technique","authors":"Babak Mohammadi ,&nbsp;Mingjie Chen ,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Nikoo ,&nbsp;Ali Al-Maktoumi ,&nbsp;Yang Yu ,&nbsp;Ruide Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hydrological modeling is essential for understanding and managing water resources, predicting flood events, and assessing the impacts of climate change on hydrological cycles. Previous research has shown the potential of machine learning (ML) models in hydrological modeling, but there remains a gap in effectively integrating these models with specific hydrological processes. This study addresses the challenges of runoff simulation in cold regions by systematically integrating Gradient Boosting Model (GBM) models with a hydrological process-based model (namely Génie Rural à 6 paramètres Journalier (GR6J) model coupled with CemaNeige snow module (GR6J-CemaNeige)) to improve hydrological modeling approaches. Four various schemes were examined for combining GBM with GR6J-CemaNeige, including production store combinations, unit hydrograph combinations, routing store concepts, and snowmelt and snowpack combinations. The GR6J-CemaNeige model achieved a Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) of 0.775 and a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.686 in the test sections, establishing a process-based baseline model for runoff simulation. The production store combinations yielded KGE values ranging from 0.722 to 0.745 and NSE from 0.601 to 0.614, while unit hydrograph combinations achieved KGE values of 0.8 and 0.804 and NSE values 0.702 and 0.705 during the test sections. The routing store combinations presented promising results with KGE values ranging from 0.805 to 0.822 and NSE values ranging from 0.71 to 0.734 for the test sections. Notably, the snowmelt and snowpack combinations achieved KGEs ranging from 0.743 to 0.759 and NSEs ranging from 0.641 to 0.666 during the test sections. The application of signal processing techniques, specifically Maximal Overlap Discrete Wavelet Transform (MWT) and Multiresolution Analysis (MRA), further improved runoff simulation accuracy across various hydrological components. The best MWT results were derived from the unit hydrograph scenario (MWT-GBM7), achieving a KGE of 0.881 and a NSE of 0.816 in the test section, demonstrating the technique’s effectiveness in capturing complex snow-related processes. For MRA, the routing store scenario (MRA-GBM9) produced the best results with a KGE of 0.881 and a NSE of 0.788 in the test section, highlighting the method’s capability to enhance the representation of runoff timing and distribution. The consistent improvement across different hydrological components suggests that the hybrid approach successfully captures complex interactions within the watershed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"657 ","pages":"Article 133114"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425004524","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrological modeling is essential for understanding and managing water resources, predicting flood events, and assessing the impacts of climate change on hydrological cycles. Previous research has shown the potential of machine learning (ML) models in hydrological modeling, but there remains a gap in effectively integrating these models with specific hydrological processes. This study addresses the challenges of runoff simulation in cold regions by systematically integrating Gradient Boosting Model (GBM) models with a hydrological process-based model (namely Génie Rural à 6 paramètres Journalier (GR6J) model coupled with CemaNeige snow module (GR6J-CemaNeige)) to improve hydrological modeling approaches. Four various schemes were examined for combining GBM with GR6J-CemaNeige, including production store combinations, unit hydrograph combinations, routing store concepts, and snowmelt and snowpack combinations. The GR6J-CemaNeige model achieved a Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) of 0.775 and a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.686 in the test sections, establishing a process-based baseline model for runoff simulation. The production store combinations yielded KGE values ranging from 0.722 to 0.745 and NSE from 0.601 to 0.614, while unit hydrograph combinations achieved KGE values of 0.8 and 0.804 and NSE values 0.702 and 0.705 during the test sections. The routing store combinations presented promising results with KGE values ranging from 0.805 to 0.822 and NSE values ranging from 0.71 to 0.734 for the test sections. Notably, the snowmelt and snowpack combinations achieved KGEs ranging from 0.743 to 0.759 and NSEs ranging from 0.641 to 0.666 during the test sections. The application of signal processing techniques, specifically Maximal Overlap Discrete Wavelet Transform (MWT) and Multiresolution Analysis (MRA), further improved runoff simulation accuracy across various hydrological components. The best MWT results were derived from the unit hydrograph scenario (MWT-GBM7), achieving a KGE of 0.881 and a NSE of 0.816 in the test section, demonstrating the technique’s effectiveness in capturing complex snow-related processes. For MRA, the routing store scenario (MRA-GBM9) produced the best results with a KGE of 0.881 and a NSE of 0.788 in the test section, highlighting the method’s capability to enhance the representation of runoff timing and distribution. The consistent improvement across different hydrological components suggests that the hybrid approach successfully captures complex interactions within the watershed.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信