Generalizability of trial criteria on amyloid-lowering therapy against Alzheimer’s disease to individuals with mild cognitive impairment or early Alzheimer’s disease in the general population
IF 7.7 1区 医学Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jacqueline J. Claus, Ilse vom Hofe, Annekee van Ijlzinga Veenstra, Silvan Licher, Harro Seelaar, Frank J. de Jong, Julia Neitzel, Meike W. Vernooij, M. Arfan Ikram, Frank J. Wolters
{"title":"Generalizability of trial criteria on amyloid-lowering therapy against Alzheimer’s disease to individuals with mild cognitive impairment or early Alzheimer’s disease in the general population","authors":"Jacqueline J. Claus, Ilse vom Hofe, Annekee van Ijlzinga Veenstra, Silvan Licher, Harro Seelaar, Frank J. de Jong, Julia Neitzel, Meike W. Vernooij, M. Arfan Ikram, Frank J. Wolters","doi":"10.1007/s10654-025-01220-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Treatment with anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibodies slowed cognitive decline in recent RCTs in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, stringent trial eligibility criteria may affect generalisability to clinical practice. We extracted eligibility criteria for trials of aducanumab, lecanemab and donanemab, and applied these to participants with MCI and early clinical AD dementia from the population-based Rotterdam Study. Participants underwent questionnaires, genotyping, brain-MRI, cognitive testing, and cardiovascular assessment. We determined amyloid status using a validated prediction model based on age and <i>APOE-g</i>enotype. Of 968 participants (mean age: 75 years, 56% women), 779 had MCI and 189 dementia. Across trials, around 40% of participants would be ineligible because of predicted amyloid negativity. At least one clinical exclusion criterion was present in 76.3% of participants for aducanumab, 75.8% for lecanemab, and 59.8% for donanemab. Common criteria were cardiovascular disease (35.2%), anticoagulant (31.2%), psychotropic or immunological medication use (20.4%), anxiety or depression (15.9%), or lack of social support (15.6%). One-third were ineligible based on brain-MRI findings alone, similar across trials and predominantly due to cerebral small-vessel disease. Combining amyloid, clinical, and imaging criteria, eligibility ranged from 9% (95% CI:7.0-11.1) for aducanumab, 8% (6.2–9.9) lecanemab to 15% (12.4–17.5) for donanemab. Findings from recent RCTs reporting protective effects of monoclonal antibodies against amyloid-β are applicable to less than 15% of community-dwelling individuals with MCI or early AD. These findings underline that evidence for drug efficacy and safety is lacking for the vast majority of patients with MCI/AD in routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11907,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Epidemiology","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-025-01220-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Treatment with anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibodies slowed cognitive decline in recent RCTs in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, stringent trial eligibility criteria may affect generalisability to clinical practice. We extracted eligibility criteria for trials of aducanumab, lecanemab and donanemab, and applied these to participants with MCI and early clinical AD dementia from the population-based Rotterdam Study. Participants underwent questionnaires, genotyping, brain-MRI, cognitive testing, and cardiovascular assessment. We determined amyloid status using a validated prediction model based on age and APOE-genotype. Of 968 participants (mean age: 75 years, 56% women), 779 had MCI and 189 dementia. Across trials, around 40% of participants would be ineligible because of predicted amyloid negativity. At least one clinical exclusion criterion was present in 76.3% of participants for aducanumab, 75.8% for lecanemab, and 59.8% for donanemab. Common criteria were cardiovascular disease (35.2%), anticoagulant (31.2%), psychotropic or immunological medication use (20.4%), anxiety or depression (15.9%), or lack of social support (15.6%). One-third were ineligible based on brain-MRI findings alone, similar across trials and predominantly due to cerebral small-vessel disease. Combining amyloid, clinical, and imaging criteria, eligibility ranged from 9% (95% CI:7.0-11.1) for aducanumab, 8% (6.2–9.9) lecanemab to 15% (12.4–17.5) for donanemab. Findings from recent RCTs reporting protective effects of monoclonal antibodies against amyloid-β are applicable to less than 15% of community-dwelling individuals with MCI or early AD. These findings underline that evidence for drug efficacy and safety is lacking for the vast majority of patients with MCI/AD in routine clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Epidemiology, established in 1985, is a peer-reviewed publication that provides a platform for discussions on epidemiology in its broadest sense. It covers various aspects of epidemiologic research and statistical methods. The journal facilitates communication between researchers, educators, and practitioners in epidemiology, including those in clinical and community medicine. Contributions from diverse fields such as public health, preventive medicine, clinical medicine, health economics, and computational biology and data science, in relation to health and disease, are encouraged. While accepting submissions from all over the world, the journal particularly emphasizes European topics relevant to epidemiology. The published articles consist of empirical research findings, developments in methodology, and opinion pieces.