A partial correlation-based connectedness approach: Extreme dependence among commodities and portfolio implications

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad , Elie Bouri , Sitara Karim , Perry Sadorsky
{"title":"A partial correlation-based connectedness approach: Extreme dependence among commodities and portfolio implications","authors":"Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad ,&nbsp;Elie Bouri ,&nbsp;Sitara Karim ,&nbsp;Perry Sadorsky","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We propose a partial correlation-based connectedness approach to study the directional connectedness under normal and extreme market conditions among the returns of 22 commodities and compare it with the well-known Diebold and Yilmaz (i.e. generalized forecast error variance decomposition (GFEVD)) connectedness approach estimated at the mean and tails. Considering four groups of commodities, namely energy, agricultural, precious metals, and industrial metals, and daily data from September 1, 2005 to June 5, 2024, covering various crisis periods, we draw filtered networks and measures of directional connectedness. The main results are summarized as follows. Firstly, the total connectedness index captures the significant commodities related shocks, and intensifies during crises episodes, notably at the extreme lower quantile. Secondly, using partial correlations in the approach of connectedness leads to a surge of the total connectedness level at the extreme lower quantile and identifies the beginnings of major crises earlier than the GFEVD measure of connectedness. Thirdly, the connectedness structure of commodities based on partial correlation is unstable during turbulent market conditions, a feature that is ignored when the GFEVD approach of connectedness is used. Fourthly, in terms of practical implications, the partial correlation-based connectedness portfolio outperforms the GFEVD based minimum connectedness portfolio on a risk adjusted basis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 108421"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325002452","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose a partial correlation-based connectedness approach to study the directional connectedness under normal and extreme market conditions among the returns of 22 commodities and compare it with the well-known Diebold and Yilmaz (i.e. generalized forecast error variance decomposition (GFEVD)) connectedness approach estimated at the mean and tails. Considering four groups of commodities, namely energy, agricultural, precious metals, and industrial metals, and daily data from September 1, 2005 to June 5, 2024, covering various crisis periods, we draw filtered networks and measures of directional connectedness. The main results are summarized as follows. Firstly, the total connectedness index captures the significant commodities related shocks, and intensifies during crises episodes, notably at the extreme lower quantile. Secondly, using partial correlations in the approach of connectedness leads to a surge of the total connectedness level at the extreme lower quantile and identifies the beginnings of major crises earlier than the GFEVD measure of connectedness. Thirdly, the connectedness structure of commodities based on partial correlation is unstable during turbulent market conditions, a feature that is ignored when the GFEVD approach of connectedness is used. Fourthly, in terms of practical implications, the partial correlation-based connectedness portfolio outperforms the GFEVD based minimum connectedness portfolio on a risk adjusted basis.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信