Evaluating the role of green innovation and global supply chain digitization in natural resource utilization for energy resilience: An empirical evidence from panel quantile regression

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Yonghong Zhang , Yao Li , Hong Wu , Yinan Peng
{"title":"Evaluating the role of green innovation and global supply chain digitization in natural resource utilization for energy resilience: An empirical evidence from panel quantile regression","authors":"Yonghong Zhang ,&nbsp;Yao Li ,&nbsp;Hong Wu ,&nbsp;Yinan Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Overexploitation of natural resources has globally become a major concern. This has prompted researchers to investigate the key factors that influence natural resource utilization and identify potential solutions to mitigate the associated issues. The excessive use of natural resources relies on supply chain distribution and green innovation development. To fill the literature and empirical gap, the present study evaluates the role of green innovation and global supply chain digitization in natural resource utilization. The study works on a global panel set of 133 economies from 1990 to 2023. The study uses the Simultaneous Panel Quantile Regression approach to capture the conditional distribution of natural resource usage across various economies, whereas the baseline regression model is pooled Ordinary Least Squares. The regression outcomes suggested the positive role of green innovation, digitization, and building materials in natural resource usage in the highest quantile. The resource impact of global supply chain distribution is reported to be positive in the highest quantile and negative in the lowest quantile. Furthermore, it was discovered that building materials had a favorable impact on the use of natural resources at every quantile. By showing how process and technology advancements can either improve or worsen resource usage, depending on their degree of application, the study substantiates the existence of the environmental rebound effect in 133 economies. According to the findings, authorities must concentrate on boosting digital supply chains and green innovation, encouraging eco-friendly technology, and putting plans in place to lessen the strain on natural resources. To move toward a more sustainable and knowledge-based economy, suggestions include enacting green taxes, offering financial incentives for environmentally friendly substitutes, luring in foreign direct investment, and bolstering green finance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 108401"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325002257","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Overexploitation of natural resources has globally become a major concern. This has prompted researchers to investigate the key factors that influence natural resource utilization and identify potential solutions to mitigate the associated issues. The excessive use of natural resources relies on supply chain distribution and green innovation development. To fill the literature and empirical gap, the present study evaluates the role of green innovation and global supply chain digitization in natural resource utilization. The study works on a global panel set of 133 economies from 1990 to 2023. The study uses the Simultaneous Panel Quantile Regression approach to capture the conditional distribution of natural resource usage across various economies, whereas the baseline regression model is pooled Ordinary Least Squares. The regression outcomes suggested the positive role of green innovation, digitization, and building materials in natural resource usage in the highest quantile. The resource impact of global supply chain distribution is reported to be positive in the highest quantile and negative in the lowest quantile. Furthermore, it was discovered that building materials had a favorable impact on the use of natural resources at every quantile. By showing how process and technology advancements can either improve or worsen resource usage, depending on their degree of application, the study substantiates the existence of the environmental rebound effect in 133 economies. According to the findings, authorities must concentrate on boosting digital supply chains and green innovation, encouraging eco-friendly technology, and putting plans in place to lessen the strain on natural resources. To move toward a more sustainable and knowledge-based economy, suggestions include enacting green taxes, offering financial incentives for environmentally friendly substitutes, luring in foreign direct investment, and bolstering green finance.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信