Artificial intelligence adoption dynamics and knowledge in SMEs and large firms: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis

IF 15.6 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Samuel Godadaw Ayinaddis
{"title":"Artificial intelligence adoption dynamics and knowledge in SMEs and large firms: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis","authors":"Samuel Godadaw Ayinaddis","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) has quickly emerged as a top technological priority for companies in various sectors, radically altering business operations. However, the existing literature reveals a fragmented and inconsistent understanding of AI adoption dynamics between small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and larger, well-established firms. This dichotomy of the existing research raises important questions about whether the AI tools and application modalities used by these companies are inherently similar or if significant differences exist in their implementation and outcomes due to varying organizational sizes. This study evaluates whether small and large firms’ efforts toward implementing AI differ significantly using bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. A total of 78 peer-reviewed articles were analyzed and categorized states and trends into 10 dimensions: (1) technology readiness, (2) customization, (3) AI tools and needs, (4) data requirements, (5) skills and competencies, (6) financial readiness, (7) management support, (8) market and competitive pressure, (9) partnership and collaboration, and (10) regulatory compliance, based on the technology–organization–environment (TOE) theoretical model. A bibliometric mapping approach was adopted to visualize bibliometric data using VOSviewer. The review brings together collective insights from several leading expert contributors to emphasize areas where SMEs need additional support to fully leverage AI technologies. The results provide pragmatic insights for policymakers, helping them develop tailored approaches for both SMEs and large enterprises to meet their unique needs while acknowledging AI's undeniable role in competitiveness and growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 3","pages":"Article 100682"},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25000320","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has quickly emerged as a top technological priority for companies in various sectors, radically altering business operations. However, the existing literature reveals a fragmented and inconsistent understanding of AI adoption dynamics between small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and larger, well-established firms. This dichotomy of the existing research raises important questions about whether the AI tools and application modalities used by these companies are inherently similar or if significant differences exist in their implementation and outcomes due to varying organizational sizes. This study evaluates whether small and large firms’ efforts toward implementing AI differ significantly using bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. A total of 78 peer-reviewed articles were analyzed and categorized states and trends into 10 dimensions: (1) technology readiness, (2) customization, (3) AI tools and needs, (4) data requirements, (5) skills and competencies, (6) financial readiness, (7) management support, (8) market and competitive pressure, (9) partnership and collaboration, and (10) regulatory compliance, based on the technology–organization–environment (TOE) theoretical model. A bibliometric mapping approach was adopted to visualize bibliometric data using VOSviewer. The review brings together collective insights from several leading expert contributors to emphasize areas where SMEs need additional support to fully leverage AI technologies. The results provide pragmatic insights for policymakers, helping them develop tailored approaches for both SMEs and large enterprises to meet their unique needs while acknowledging AI's undeniable role in competitiveness and growth.
中小企业和大企业的人工智能采用动态和知识:系统回顾和文献计量分析
人工智能(AI)已迅速成为各个行业公司的首要技术重点,从根本上改变了业务运营。然而,现有文献揭示了对中小型企业(sme)和大型成熟企业之间人工智能采用动态的支离破碎和不一致的理解。现有研究的这种二分法提出了一个重要的问题,即这些公司使用的人工智能工具和应用模式是否本质上相似,或者由于组织规模的不同,它们的实施和结果是否存在显着差异。本研究通过文献计量学分析和来自Web of Science和Scopus数据库的系统文献综述,评估了小型和大型公司在实施人工智能方面的努力是否有显著差异。基于技术-组织-环境(TOE)理论模型,共分析了78篇同行评议的文章,并将状态和趋势分为10个维度:(1)技术准备程度,(2)定制,(3)人工智能工具和需求,(4)数据需求,(5)技能和能力,(6)财务准备程度,(7)管理支持,(8)市场和竞争压力,(9)伙伴关系和协作,以及(10)法规遵从性。采用文献计量制图方法,利用VOSviewer可视化文献计量数据。该报告汇集了几位主要专家的集体见解,强调了中小企业需要额外支持以充分利用人工智能技术的领域。研究结果为政策制定者提供了务实的见解,帮助他们为中小企业和大型企业制定量身定制的方法,以满足其独特需求,同时承认人工智能在竞争力和增长中不可否认的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
12.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices. JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience. In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信