Does telehealth delivery of an occupational therapy home visiting service provide a non-inferior alternative to in-person delivery of the same service? A matched cohort study

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Rachel Lommerzheim, Feby Savira, Georgina Lewis, Grace Taylor, Kiran Hari, Shanice Pereira, Toni Heinemann, Lisa Barry, Rebecca Grant, Dave Parsons, Suzanne Robinson, Kristie Harper
{"title":"Does telehealth delivery of an occupational therapy home visiting service provide a non-inferior alternative to in-person delivery of the same service? A matched cohort study","authors":"Rachel Lommerzheim,&nbsp;Feby Savira,&nbsp;Georgina Lewis,&nbsp;Grace Taylor,&nbsp;Kiran Hari,&nbsp;Shanice Pereira,&nbsp;Toni Heinemann,&nbsp;Lisa Barry,&nbsp;Rebecca Grant,&nbsp;Dave Parsons,&nbsp;Suzanne Robinson,&nbsp;Kristie Harper","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Health services are encouraging the adoption of telehealth to improve efficiencies and health-care access for patients. Research is needed to explore clinical outcomes in telehealth occupational therapy home visiting services. The aim of this study was to determine if telehealth delivery of occupational therapy home visiting services reduces total therapy time while maintaining clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective matched cohort study to examine the impact of telehealth occupational therapy home visiting services on therapy time and clinical outcomes, compared to standard in-person therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 544 patients were included (telehealth services [case] = 216, in-person services [control] = 272, received both resulting in a hybrid service = 56). Differences in total therapy time between groups were significant: median therapy time in the telehealth (case) group was 40 minutes (IQR: 63.8) versus 160 minutes (IQR: 90) in the in-person (control) group (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Patients in the hybrid group were excluded from this comparison as received mixed care. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the incidence of adverse events such as falls, delirium, and pressure injuries (<i>P</i> = 0.32). Fifty-six patients (20.6%) in the case group escalated to require in-person services receiving hybrid care. Factors associated with switching from telehealth to in-person services included the need for carer education and equipment assessment and provision, which resulted in greater therapy time and more occasions of service.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Telehealth delivery of occupational therapy home visiting services reduced therapy time and did not increase incidences of adverse events. However, telehealth delivery of services is not appropriate for all patients, and hybrid models of care must be considered.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary:</h3>\n \n <p>Occupational therapists help patients leave the hospital and live safely at home. They visit homes to see if patients can manage on their own. Therapists may suggest changes like adding grab bars or bathing aids to make the home safer. These visits take a lot of time, so telehealth is being tested as a way to reduce the need for in-person services. This study looked at whether telehealth could save time and reduce workloads. This study found telehealth visits were shorter than in-person visits. It also found there were no differences between groups for events like falls, delirium, and pressure injuries. However, some patients still needed in-person visits, especially for equipment setup or caregiver training. Telehealth is a helpful tool, but it is important to know when in-person visits are still needed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":"72 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.70013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Health services are encouraging the adoption of telehealth to improve efficiencies and health-care access for patients. Research is needed to explore clinical outcomes in telehealth occupational therapy home visiting services. The aim of this study was to determine if telehealth delivery of occupational therapy home visiting services reduces total therapy time while maintaining clinical outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective matched cohort study to examine the impact of telehealth occupational therapy home visiting services on therapy time and clinical outcomes, compared to standard in-person therapy.

Results

A total of 544 patients were included (telehealth services [case] = 216, in-person services [control] = 272, received both resulting in a hybrid service = 56). Differences in total therapy time between groups were significant: median therapy time in the telehealth (case) group was 40 minutes (IQR: 63.8) versus 160 minutes (IQR: 90) in the in-person (control) group (P < 0.001). Patients in the hybrid group were excluded from this comparison as received mixed care. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the incidence of adverse events such as falls, delirium, and pressure injuries (P = 0.32). Fifty-six patients (20.6%) in the case group escalated to require in-person services receiving hybrid care. Factors associated with switching from telehealth to in-person services included the need for carer education and equipment assessment and provision, which resulted in greater therapy time and more occasions of service.

Conclusion

Telehealth delivery of occupational therapy home visiting services reduced therapy time and did not increase incidences of adverse events. However, telehealth delivery of services is not appropriate for all patients, and hybrid models of care must be considered.

Plain Language Summary:

Occupational therapists help patients leave the hospital and live safely at home. They visit homes to see if patients can manage on their own. Therapists may suggest changes like adding grab bars or bathing aids to make the home safer. These visits take a lot of time, so telehealth is being tested as a way to reduce the need for in-person services. This study looked at whether telehealth could save time and reduce workloads. This study found telehealth visits were shorter than in-person visits. It also found there were no differences between groups for events like falls, delirium, and pressure injuries. However, some patients still needed in-person visits, especially for equipment setup or caregiver training. Telehealth is a helpful tool, but it is important to know when in-person visits are still needed.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信