Comparison outcomes of cheilectomy, hemi-implant arthroplasty and decompression osteotomy for the treatment of hallux rigidus: A retrospective study of 153 patients.
{"title":"Comparison outcomes of cheilectomy, hemi-implant arthroplasty and decompression osteotomy for the treatment of hallux rigidus: A retrospective study of 153 patients.","authors":"Ashley A Mariano, Lawrence M Fallat","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective case series investigated the treatment outcomes for hallux rigidus. A total of 153 patients (130 females, 49 males) were included. Of the 153 patients, 26 were bilateral and 179 procedures met the inclusion criteria. The patients had undergone 1 of the following procedures: cheilectomy (Group 1), hemi-implant arthroplasty (Group 2), decompression metatarsal osteotomy (DMO) (Group 3), and DMO with hemi-implant (Group 4). Mean patient age was 57 years (range 18-82), and the mean follow-up period was 26 months (range 12-72). All patients regardless of procedure had improvement in pain score with Group 4 demonstrating the greatest reduction in pain at 99 %. The majority of patients in the study had Stage II hallux limitus/rigidus (HL/HR) (67 patients), followed by 62 patients with Stage III and 49 patients with Stage IV. Preoperatively, the majority of patients lacked dorsiflexion at the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Group 1 gained 16° in dorsiflexion from preoperative to postoperative, Group 2 gained 20°, Group 3 gained 30° and Group 4 gained 24° by the 12 month followup. The results revealed that adhesions were the most common complication for all 4 surgical groups. These four surgical procedures for the treatment of Stage II, III and IV hallux rigidus are viable options and lead to satisfactory long-term outcomes that restore function, relieve pain and improve joint range of motion. Each procedure has demonstrated satisfactory long-term outcomes and high patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.03.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This retrospective case series investigated the treatment outcomes for hallux rigidus. A total of 153 patients (130 females, 49 males) were included. Of the 153 patients, 26 were bilateral and 179 procedures met the inclusion criteria. The patients had undergone 1 of the following procedures: cheilectomy (Group 1), hemi-implant arthroplasty (Group 2), decompression metatarsal osteotomy (DMO) (Group 3), and DMO with hemi-implant (Group 4). Mean patient age was 57 years (range 18-82), and the mean follow-up period was 26 months (range 12-72). All patients regardless of procedure had improvement in pain score with Group 4 demonstrating the greatest reduction in pain at 99 %. The majority of patients in the study had Stage II hallux limitus/rigidus (HL/HR) (67 patients), followed by 62 patients with Stage III and 49 patients with Stage IV. Preoperatively, the majority of patients lacked dorsiflexion at the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Group 1 gained 16° in dorsiflexion from preoperative to postoperative, Group 2 gained 20°, Group 3 gained 30° and Group 4 gained 24° by the 12 month followup. The results revealed that adhesions were the most common complication for all 4 surgical groups. These four surgical procedures for the treatment of Stage II, III and IV hallux rigidus are viable options and lead to satisfactory long-term outcomes that restore function, relieve pain and improve joint range of motion. Each procedure has demonstrated satisfactory long-term outcomes and high patient satisfaction.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.