Validating the effectiveness of a classroom-setting form of early clinical exposure with direct physician involvement in gastrointestinal physiology education.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yan Yan, Lihong Hu, Ying Zhang, Bo Cao, Qiang Zhou, Yujia Huang, Jiao Wang, Haixia Wen, Hui Zhu
{"title":"Validating the effectiveness of a classroom-setting form of early clinical exposure with direct physician involvement in gastrointestinal physiology education.","authors":"Yan Yan, Lihong Hu, Ying Zhang, Bo Cao, Qiang Zhou, Yujia Huang, Jiao Wang, Haixia Wen, Hui Zhu","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07019-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early clinical exposure (ECE) represents one form of vertical integration that bridges the gap between the early theoretical years and the clinical practicing years in undergraduate medical education. In most medical colleges in China, the complex healthcare system and large-enrollment classes pose significant challenges for implementing ECE in a hospital setting. However, there is a paucity of data comprehensively demonstrating the effectiveness of a classroom-setting form of ECE with direct physician involvement in physiology education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>181 sophomore clinical medicine students from Harbin Medical University were randomly divided into two groups: a control group (n = 91) and an experimental group (n = 90). The control group received traditional flipped classroom (FC) teaching, whereas the experimental group participated in ECE teaching, which featured a gastroenterology physician and real patient cases in their final class session. Upon completion of the classes, both groups took a posttest. At the end of the semester, both groups were assigned the task of writing an original science communication on any physiology-related topic. The effectiveness of ECE was assessed by comparing posttest scores, the frequency of online self-directed learning, and the number of science communications addressing the digestive system between the two groups. Additionally, a questionnaire was administered to assess the experimental group's perceptions of the ECE teaching method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The posttest scores and the rates of excellence for the two groups showed no statistical differences. Although no difference was found in the frequency of self-directed learning between the two groups during the gastrointestinal physiology classes, the experimental group exhibited a frequency of self-directed learning that was more than twice that of the control group on the day following the physician's lecture. Furthermore, the number of science communications focusing on the digestive system was significantly higher in the experimental group compared to the control group (17/73 vs. 8/83, P < 0.05). In the questionnaire, more than 94% of the students expressed positive attitudes towards classroom-setting form of ECE with direct physician involvement and expressed a desire for this method to be applied in other chapters of physiology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The classroom-setting form of ECE with direct physician involvement may not demonstrate immediate impact, but it encourages active learning, facilitates understanding of the subject's relevance, and enhances students' value output.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"416"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07019-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early clinical exposure (ECE) represents one form of vertical integration that bridges the gap between the early theoretical years and the clinical practicing years in undergraduate medical education. In most medical colleges in China, the complex healthcare system and large-enrollment classes pose significant challenges for implementing ECE in a hospital setting. However, there is a paucity of data comprehensively demonstrating the effectiveness of a classroom-setting form of ECE with direct physician involvement in physiology education.

Methods: 181 sophomore clinical medicine students from Harbin Medical University were randomly divided into two groups: a control group (n = 91) and an experimental group (n = 90). The control group received traditional flipped classroom (FC) teaching, whereas the experimental group participated in ECE teaching, which featured a gastroenterology physician and real patient cases in their final class session. Upon completion of the classes, both groups took a posttest. At the end of the semester, both groups were assigned the task of writing an original science communication on any physiology-related topic. The effectiveness of ECE was assessed by comparing posttest scores, the frequency of online self-directed learning, and the number of science communications addressing the digestive system between the two groups. Additionally, a questionnaire was administered to assess the experimental group's perceptions of the ECE teaching method.

Results: The posttest scores and the rates of excellence for the two groups showed no statistical differences. Although no difference was found in the frequency of self-directed learning between the two groups during the gastrointestinal physiology classes, the experimental group exhibited a frequency of self-directed learning that was more than twice that of the control group on the day following the physician's lecture. Furthermore, the number of science communications focusing on the digestive system was significantly higher in the experimental group compared to the control group (17/73 vs. 8/83, P < 0.05). In the questionnaire, more than 94% of the students expressed positive attitudes towards classroom-setting form of ECE with direct physician involvement and expressed a desire for this method to be applied in other chapters of physiology.

Conclusions: The classroom-setting form of ECE with direct physician involvement may not demonstrate immediate impact, but it encourages active learning, facilitates understanding of the subject's relevance, and enhances students' value output.

验证由医生直接参与胃肠生理学教育的早期临床暴露课堂设置形式的有效性。
背景:早期临床暴露(ECE)代表了垂直整合的一种形式,它弥补了本科医学教育中早期理论年和临床实践年之间的差距。在中国的大多数医学院,复杂的医疗体系和庞大的招生班级为在医院环境中实施ECE带来了巨大的挑战。然而,缺乏数据全面证明直接医生参与生理学教育的课堂设置形式的ECE的有效性。方法:选取哈尔滨医科大学临床医学专业大二学生181名,随机分为对照组(n = 91)和实验组(n = 90)。对照组采用传统的翻转课堂(FC)教学,实验组采用ECE教学,最后一节课由胃肠内科医生授课,并结合真实病例进行教学。课程结束后,两组都进行了后测。学期结束时,两组学生都被要求写一篇关于生理学相关主题的原创科学论文。ECE的有效性是通过比较两组之间的后测试分数、在线自主学习的频率和关于消化系统的科学交流的数量来评估的。此外,通过问卷调查来评估实验组对ECE教学方法的看法。结果:两组的后测得分和优秀率无统计学差异。虽然在胃肠生理学课上,两组学生的自主学习频率没有差异,但在医生讲课后的第二天,实验组学生的自主学习频率是对照组的两倍多。此外,与对照组相比,实验组关注消化系统的科学传播数量显著增加(17/73 vs. 8/83), P结论:由医生直接参与的ECE课堂设置形式可能不会显示出直接的影响,但它鼓励主动学习,促进对主题相关性的理解,并提高学生的价值输出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信