Shades of acceptance and adjustment; a discursive psychological analysis to showcase empathy in medical students.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Haniya Habib, Sara Anjum Niinuma, Khadeja Alrefaie, Heba Awad Al Khalaf, Mohammad Jasem Hani, Zeinab Yaareb Mosleh Al-Rawi, Zarish Hussain, Prianna Menezes, Sornali Rani Roy, Bincy Mathew, Salman Yousuf Guraya, Alfred Nicholson, Shaista Salman Guraya
{"title":"Shades of acceptance and adjustment; a discursive psychological analysis to showcase empathy in medical students.","authors":"Haniya Habib, Sara Anjum Niinuma, Khadeja Alrefaie, Heba Awad Al Khalaf, Mohammad Jasem Hani, Zeinab Yaareb Mosleh Al-Rawi, Zarish Hussain, Prianna Menezes, Sornali Rani Roy, Bincy Mathew, Salman Yousuf Guraya, Alfred Nicholson, Shaista Salman Guraya","doi":"10.1186/s12909-024-06625-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Empathy is a crucial prosocial behaviour. Medical education greatly emphasizes fostering empathy as a positive aspect of personal and professional development. Moreover, empathic practitioners produce improved patient care and clinical outcomes. However, medical schools often struggle to nurture empathetic behaviours among students despite a proclaimed empathy cultivating curricula. Research reveals complex patterns in empathy development among medical students, with disparities in adoptions across academic years. In this study, we explored how empathy is perceived during undergraduate medical training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was conducted with medical students using focused group discussions and structured interview questions. These were developed according to the perceived behavioural construct of the theory of planned behaviour. Data was analysed using critical discursive psychology to identify students' use of language and shifting understandings about empathy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis showed that empathy is not a static trait but a complex and evolving process comprising two primary repertoires: Acceptance, where students passively adopt existing norms, and Adjustment, where they actively recalibrate their emotional responses to maintain genuine empathy. We identified that students take on five-character roles (confident beginner, passive observer, reflective learner, problem solver, and autonomous learner) while justifying their intentional choices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight insights concerning students' perceptions of empathy enactment, ranging from acceptance to adjustment. These constructs indicate students' ability to engage in clinical practices, perceive their roles as future doctors, and express their emotions. Medical educators should guide students in moving from passive acceptance to active adjustment by encouraging emotional awareness and by promoting diverse interpretations that support the development of empathetic professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06625-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Empathy is a crucial prosocial behaviour. Medical education greatly emphasizes fostering empathy as a positive aspect of personal and professional development. Moreover, empathic practitioners produce improved patient care and clinical outcomes. However, medical schools often struggle to nurture empathetic behaviours among students despite a proclaimed empathy cultivating curricula. Research reveals complex patterns in empathy development among medical students, with disparities in adoptions across academic years. In this study, we explored how empathy is perceived during undergraduate medical training.

Methods: This qualitative study was conducted with medical students using focused group discussions and structured interview questions. These were developed according to the perceived behavioural construct of the theory of planned behaviour. Data was analysed using critical discursive psychology to identify students' use of language and shifting understandings about empathy.

Results: Our analysis showed that empathy is not a static trait but a complex and evolving process comprising two primary repertoires: Acceptance, where students passively adopt existing norms, and Adjustment, where they actively recalibrate their emotional responses to maintain genuine empathy. We identified that students take on five-character roles (confident beginner, passive observer, reflective learner, problem solver, and autonomous learner) while justifying their intentional choices.

Conclusion: These findings highlight insights concerning students' perceptions of empathy enactment, ranging from acceptance to adjustment. These constructs indicate students' ability to engage in clinical practices, perceive their roles as future doctors, and express their emotions. Medical educators should guide students in moving from passive acceptance to active adjustment by encouraging emotional awareness and by promoting diverse interpretations that support the development of empathetic professionals.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信