Changes in alveolar bone remodeling after maxillary anterior retraction using fixed appliances with different periodontal conditions: A retrospective study based on cone-beam computed tomography.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Yao Li, Jiaxin Huang, Zixin Fan, Minxuan Han, Yan Gu, Dandan Li, Yuan Li, Lu Li
{"title":"Changes in alveolar bone remodeling after maxillary anterior retraction using fixed appliances with different periodontal conditions: A retrospective study based on cone-beam computed tomography.","authors":"Yao Li, Jiaxin Huang, Zixin Fan, Minxuan Han, Yan Gu, Dandan Li, Yuan Li, Lu Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to compare changes in maxillary anterior alveolar bone remodeling and complication rates in adult patients with different periodontal conditions after maxillary anterior tooth retraction using fixed appliances. In addition, this study analyzed potential factors affecting alveolar bone thickness in patients with periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 55 adult patients (mean age, 23.53 ± 4.55 years) with Angle Class I or II Division 1 malocclusion with maxillary protrusion were recruited and categorized into the healthy control group (n = 23), stage I periodontitis (P-I) group (n = 17), and stage II periodontitis (P-II) group (n = 15). The maxillary anterior teeth were retracted using a fixed appliance. Cone-beam computed tomography was used to measure the thickness, height, and density of the alveolar bone in the maxillary anterior region before (T1) and after (T2) treatment. The incidences of bone dehiscence and fenestration were documented. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate intergroup and intragroup differences. Clinical and cephalometric data were collected to identify factors affecting the changes in alveolar bone thickness using multivariate linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The labial alveolar bone thickness increased significantly after treatment in all groups, but no differences were observed among the groups. In contrast, the palatal alveolar bone thickness decreased, particularly in the P-I and P-II groups, at the midroot and apical levels (P <0.05). A significant decrease in alveolar bone height was observed in the P-I and P-II groups (P <0.05). The incidence of palatal bone dehiscence was higher in the P-II (84.44%) and P-I (69.61%) groups. Multivariate linear regression analyses revealed that sex, treatment duration, periodontal treatment, changes in tooth inclination, and initial thickness significantly affected palatal alveolar bone thickness changes in patients with periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth with a fixed appliance, the labial alveolar bone of the maxillary anterior teeth thickened, whereas the palatal bone exhibited thinning in adults with periodontitis. The reduction in palatal bone height was more significant in this population than in healthy subjects, along with a higher incidence of palatal bone dehiscence. Bone morphology must be carefully assessed, considering these relevant factors before and during orthodontic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.02.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to compare changes in maxillary anterior alveolar bone remodeling and complication rates in adult patients with different periodontal conditions after maxillary anterior tooth retraction using fixed appliances. In addition, this study analyzed potential factors affecting alveolar bone thickness in patients with periodontitis.

Methods: A total of 55 adult patients (mean age, 23.53 ± 4.55 years) with Angle Class I or II Division 1 malocclusion with maxillary protrusion were recruited and categorized into the healthy control group (n = 23), stage I periodontitis (P-I) group (n = 17), and stage II periodontitis (P-II) group (n = 15). The maxillary anterior teeth were retracted using a fixed appliance. Cone-beam computed tomography was used to measure the thickness, height, and density of the alveolar bone in the maxillary anterior region before (T1) and after (T2) treatment. The incidences of bone dehiscence and fenestration were documented. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate intergroup and intragroup differences. Clinical and cephalometric data were collected to identify factors affecting the changes in alveolar bone thickness using multivariate linear regression analysis.

Results: The labial alveolar bone thickness increased significantly after treatment in all groups, but no differences were observed among the groups. In contrast, the palatal alveolar bone thickness decreased, particularly in the P-I and P-II groups, at the midroot and apical levels (P <0.05). A significant decrease in alveolar bone height was observed in the P-I and P-II groups (P <0.05). The incidence of palatal bone dehiscence was higher in the P-II (84.44%) and P-I (69.61%) groups. Multivariate linear regression analyses revealed that sex, treatment duration, periodontal treatment, changes in tooth inclination, and initial thickness significantly affected palatal alveolar bone thickness changes in patients with periodontitis.

Conclusions: After retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth with a fixed appliance, the labial alveolar bone of the maxillary anterior teeth thickened, whereas the palatal bone exhibited thinning in adults with periodontitis. The reduction in palatal bone height was more significant in this population than in healthy subjects, along with a higher incidence of palatal bone dehiscence. Bone morphology must be carefully assessed, considering these relevant factors before and during orthodontic treatment.

不同牙周条件下固定矫治器上颌前牙后牙槽骨重塑的变化:一项基于锥束计算机断层扫描的回顾性研究。
摘要:本研究旨在比较不同牙周状况的成人上颌前牙固定矫治器后上颌前牙骨重塑的变化及并发症发生率。此外,本研究还分析了影响牙周炎患者牙槽骨厚度的潜在因素。方法:选取Angleⅰ类、ⅱ类ⅰ类错颌合伴上颌前突的成人患者55例(平均年龄23.53±4.55岁),分为健康对照组(n = 23)、ⅰ期牙周炎组(n = 17)和ⅱ期牙周炎(n = 15)。上颌前牙用固定矫治器收拔。在治疗前(T1)和治疗后(T2)使用锥形束计算机断层扫描测量上颌前区牙槽骨的厚度、高度和密度。记录了骨裂和开窗的发生率。对组间和组内差异进行统计分析。采用多变量线性回归分析,收集临床和头颅测量数据,确定影响牙槽骨厚度变化的因素。结果:各组治疗后唇牙槽骨厚度均明显增加,但组间差异无统计学意义。相反,腭牙槽骨厚度下降,特别是在P- i和P- ii组,在根中和根尖水平(P结论:用固定矫治器牵回上颌前牙后,上颌前牙的唇槽骨增厚,而牙周炎患者的腭骨变薄。在这一人群中,腭骨高度的降低比健康人群更为显著,同时腭骨开裂的发生率也更高。骨形态必须仔细评估,在正畸治疗之前和期间考虑这些相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
432
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信