Gender/sex differences: Representation of women in lateral ankle sprain research.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2025-03-22 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13349
Nicole B Katz, Julie K Silver, Kelly C McInnis
{"title":"Gender/sex differences: Representation of women in lateral ankle sprain research.","authors":"Nicole B Katz, Julie K Silver, Kelly C McInnis","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women have historically comprised lower percentages of sports science research participants compared to men. Lateral ankle sprains (LAS) are a common musculoskeletal injury that may affect women more than men.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary purpose was to assess the representation of women participants in LAS research. The secondary purpose was to analyze the representation of women as authors in this same work.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Systematic reviews on LAS in adults published between May 2013 and April 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eleven systematic reviews on LAS with 77 unique original research studies (10, 080 participants, 335 authors) met inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The main outcomes were the proportion of women as participants and in author roles (primary, senior, and overall).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women were underrepresented as participants (41%, n = 4150). Women were also the minority gender/sex for authors overall (26%, n = 86) as well as primary (32%, n = 23) and senior (29%, n = 19) authors. No clear increase in the inclusion of women as research participants was observed over time (p = .4), nor was there a significant increase in women authors (p = .1). A greater proportion of participants were women when the primary author was a woman (p = .008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women are underrepresented in LAS research overall, and there is a lack of clear progress in representation over time. Similarly, women are a minority of study authors and data suggest a possible temporal trend of improvement. Efforts should be made to increase the proportion of women included in LAS research in order to support equitable evidence-based care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women have historically comprised lower percentages of sports science research participants compared to men. Lateral ankle sprains (LAS) are a common musculoskeletal injury that may affect women more than men.

Objective: The primary purpose was to assess the representation of women participants in LAS research. The secondary purpose was to analyze the representation of women as authors in this same work.

Design: Observational study.

Setting: Systematic reviews on LAS in adults published between May 2013 and April 2023.

Participants: Eleven systematic reviews on LAS with 77 unique original research studies (10, 080 participants, 335 authors) met inclusion criteria.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: The main outcomes were the proportion of women as participants and in author roles (primary, senior, and overall).

Results: Women were underrepresented as participants (41%, n = 4150). Women were also the minority gender/sex for authors overall (26%, n = 86) as well as primary (32%, n = 23) and senior (29%, n = 19) authors. No clear increase in the inclusion of women as research participants was observed over time (p = .4), nor was there a significant increase in women authors (p = .1). A greater proportion of participants were women when the primary author was a woman (p = .008).

Conclusion: Women are underrepresented in LAS research overall, and there is a lack of clear progress in representation over time. Similarly, women are a minority of study authors and data suggest a possible temporal trend of improvement. Efforts should be made to increase the proportion of women included in LAS research in order to support equitable evidence-based care.

背景:与男性相比,女性在体育科学研究参与者中所占的比例历来较低。外侧踝关节扭伤(LAS)是一种常见的肌肉骨骼损伤,对女性的影响可能大于男性:主要目的是评估女性参与者在踝关节外侧扭伤研究中的代表性。设计:观察性研究:观察性研究:2013年5月至2023年4月期间发表的关于成人LAS的系统综述:11篇关于LAS的系统综述,77项独特的原始研究(10 080名参与者,335名作者)符合纳入标准:主要结果测量:主要结果是女性参与者和作者(主要作者、高级作者和总作者)的比例:结果:女性参与者比例偏低(41%,n = 4150)。在作者总数(26%,n = 86)以及主要作者(32%,n = 23)和资深作者(29%,n = 19)中,女性也是少数性别。随着时间的推移,女性作为研究参与者的比例没有明显增加(p = .4),女性作者的比例也没有显著增加(p = .1)。当主要作者为女性时,女性参与者的比例更高(p = .008):结论:总体而言,女性在法学研究中的代表性不足,而且随着时间的推移,女性在法学研究中的代表性也没有明显提高。同样,女性在研究作者中也占少数,数据显示可能存在改善的时间趋势。应努力提高女性在法医学研究中的比例,以支持公平的循证护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信