A modular, mechanical knee model for the development and validation of robotic testing methodologies.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Lesley Arant, Jabneel Cardona-Perez, Joshua Roth
{"title":"A modular, mechanical knee model for the development and validation of robotic testing methodologies.","authors":"Lesley Arant, Jabneel Cardona-Perez, Joshua Roth","doi":"10.1115/1.4068262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Six-degree-of-freedom robotic testing is used to gain insight into knee function by measuring the biomechanics of cadaveric knees. However, it can be challenging to use cadaveric knees to validate robotic testing methodologies and to compare methodologies across laboratories because cadavers have variable properties and require lengthy preparation. Therefore, our primary objective was to develop a modular, mechanical knee model for robotic testing with comparable biomechanics to those of human cadaveric knees. A secondary objective was to use the knee model to benchmark the errors in ligament tensions measured using the superposition method, which is a common robotic testing workflow to determine in situ ligament tensions. We designed a knee model consisting of femur and tibia components that are constrained by their articular geometries and by ligament phantoms. We used our robotic testing system to measure the kinetic-kinematic relationships under anterior-posterior, varus-valgus, and internal-external loading in four knee models with different design features. We achieved variable kinetic-kinematic relationships across the knee models by adding secondary restraints, altering the engagement of the ligament phantoms, and incorporating osteoarthritic features. The knee models had comparable laxities to cadaveric knees, although most knee models did not capture the flexion-dependent kinematics of cadaveric knees. We also found comparable errors in superposition-computed tensions in the lateral collateral ligament between the knee models and cadaveric knees. Therefore, the knee model is a biomechanically representative specimen that can be a valuable tool for developing and validating robotic testing methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Six-degree-of-freedom robotic testing is used to gain insight into knee function by measuring the biomechanics of cadaveric knees. However, it can be challenging to use cadaveric knees to validate robotic testing methodologies and to compare methodologies across laboratories because cadavers have variable properties and require lengthy preparation. Therefore, our primary objective was to develop a modular, mechanical knee model for robotic testing with comparable biomechanics to those of human cadaveric knees. A secondary objective was to use the knee model to benchmark the errors in ligament tensions measured using the superposition method, which is a common robotic testing workflow to determine in situ ligament tensions. We designed a knee model consisting of femur and tibia components that are constrained by their articular geometries and by ligament phantoms. We used our robotic testing system to measure the kinetic-kinematic relationships under anterior-posterior, varus-valgus, and internal-external loading in four knee models with different design features. We achieved variable kinetic-kinematic relationships across the knee models by adding secondary restraints, altering the engagement of the ligament phantoms, and incorporating osteoarthritic features. The knee models had comparable laxities to cadaveric knees, although most knee models did not capture the flexion-dependent kinematics of cadaveric knees. We also found comparable errors in superposition-computed tensions in the lateral collateral ligament between the knee models and cadaveric knees. Therefore, the knee model is a biomechanically representative specimen that can be a valuable tool for developing and validating robotic testing methodologies.

六自由度机器人测试是通过测量尸体膝关节的生物力学来了解膝关节功能的。然而,使用尸体膝关节来验证机器人测试方法和比较不同实验室的测试方法具有挑战性,因为尸体的特性各不相同,而且需要长时间的准备。因此,我们的首要目标是为机器人测试开发一个模块化的机械膝关节模型,其生物力学性能与人体尸体膝关节相当。次要目标是使用该膝关节模型对使用叠加法测得的韧带张力误差进行基准测试,叠加法是确定原位韧带张力的常用机器人测试工作流程。我们设计了一个由股骨和胫骨部件组成的膝关节模型,这些部件受到其关节几何形状和韧带模型的限制。我们使用机器人测试系统测量了具有不同设计特征的四个膝关节模型在前后、上下和内外负荷下的动力学运动关系。我们通过增加辅助约束、改变韧带假体的啮合度以及加入骨关节炎特征,实现了不同膝关节模型的运动学关系。膝关节模型的松弛程度与尸体膝关节相当,但大多数膝关节模型没有捕捉到尸体膝关节的屈曲依赖运动学特性。我们还发现,膝关节模型和尸体膝关节外侧副韧带的叠加计算张力误差相当。因此,膝关节模型是一种具有生物力学代表性的样本,是开发和验证机器人测试方法的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信