Association of potentially inappropriate medications with frailty and frailty components in community-dwelling older women in Japan: The Otassha Study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Kaori Daimaru, Sho Hatanaka, Yosuke Osuka, Narumi Kojima, Kazushi Maruo, Hiroyuki Sasai
{"title":"Association of potentially inappropriate medications with frailty and frailty components in community-dwelling older women in Japan: The Otassha Study.","authors":"Kaori Daimaru, Sho Hatanaka, Yosuke Osuka, Narumi Kojima, Kazushi Maruo, Hiroyuki Sasai","doi":"10.1111/ggi.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older adults can increase the risk of drug-related adverse events. We aimed to examine the associations between PIMs, frailty, and each frailty component in community-dwelling older women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included participants aged ≥65 years from a prospective cohort of older Japanese women. Frailty was classified using the Japanese version of Fried's Frailty Criteria, comprising five components. PIMs were identified using a screening tool for Japanese among regular prescription medications collected from participants' prescription notebooks. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age and comorbidities were used to examine the association between PIMs (0, 1, 2, ≥3), frailty, and each component. The possible interactions between age groups (65-74 and ≥75 years) and PIMs were investigated. Age-stratified analyses were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 530 older women (median age [interquartile range], 71 [68, 75] years) with a frailty prevalence of 5.5%. Three or more PIMs were associated with frailty and weight loss (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 3.80 [1.23, 11.80], 2.53 [1.15, 5.39]). In age-stratified analyses, ≥3 PIMs were associated with weight loss (8.39 [1.79, 48.98]) in women aged ≥75 years, whereas 1 or 2 PIMs were associated with frailty (4.52 [1.17, 19.08]) or weakness (3.13 [1.22, 7.78]) in those aged 65-74 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results may suggest that the number of PIM prescriptions is associated with frailty and frailty components in older women. Longitudinal studies are required to clarify the causality between the number of PIMs and frailty. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; ••: ••-••.</p>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.70035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older adults can increase the risk of drug-related adverse events. We aimed to examine the associations between PIMs, frailty, and each frailty component in community-dwelling older women.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included participants aged ≥65 years from a prospective cohort of older Japanese women. Frailty was classified using the Japanese version of Fried's Frailty Criteria, comprising five components. PIMs were identified using a screening tool for Japanese among regular prescription medications collected from participants' prescription notebooks. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age and comorbidities were used to examine the association between PIMs (0, 1, 2, ≥3), frailty, and each component. The possible interactions between age groups (65-74 and ≥75 years) and PIMs were investigated. Age-stratified analyses were also performed.

Results: We analyzed 530 older women (median age [interquartile range], 71 [68, 75] years) with a frailty prevalence of 5.5%. Three or more PIMs were associated with frailty and weight loss (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 3.80 [1.23, 11.80], 2.53 [1.15, 5.39]). In age-stratified analyses, ≥3 PIMs were associated with weight loss (8.39 [1.79, 48.98]) in women aged ≥75 years, whereas 1 or 2 PIMs were associated with frailty (4.52 [1.17, 19.08]) or weakness (3.13 [1.22, 7.78]) in those aged 65-74 years.

Conclusions: Our results may suggest that the number of PIM prescriptions is associated with frailty and frailty components in older women. Longitudinal studies are required to clarify the causality between the number of PIMs and frailty. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; ••: ••-••.

在日本社区居住的老年妇女中,潜在的不适当药物与虚弱和虚弱成分的关联:Otassha研究。
目的:在老年人中使用潜在不适当的药物(PIMs)会增加药物相关不良事件的风险。我们的目的是在社区居住的老年妇女中检查PIMs、虚弱和每个虚弱组成部分之间的关联。方法:本横断面研究纳入年龄≥65岁的日本老年妇女前瞻性队列。虚弱是用日本版的弗里德虚弱标准来分类的,包括五个部分。使用日本人的筛选工具从参与者的处方笔记本中收集的常规处方药中确定pim。采用调整年龄和合并症的多变量logistic回归模型来检验pim(0、1、2、≥3)、虚弱和各组成部分之间的关系。研究年龄组别(65-74岁和≥75岁)与pim之间可能存在的相互作用。还进行了年龄分层分析。结果:我们分析了530名老年妇女(中位年龄[四分位数间距],71[68,75]岁),虚弱患病率为5.5%。三次或三次以上的pim与虚弱和体重减轻相关(调整后的优势比[95%置信区间],3.80[1.23,11.80],2.53[1.15,5.39])。在年龄分层分析中,≥3次PIMs与75岁以上女性的体重减轻相关(8.39[1.79,48.98]),而1或2次PIMs与65-74岁女性的虚弱相关(4.52[1.17,19.08])或虚弱(3.13[1.22,7.78])。结论:我们的研究结果可能表明,PIM处方的数量与老年妇女的虚弱和虚弱成分有关。需要进行纵向研究来阐明pim数量与虚弱之间的因果关系。Geriatr Gerontol 2025;••: ••-••.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the official Journal of the Japan Geriatrics Society, reflecting the growing importance of the subject area in developed economies and their particular significance to a country like Japan with a large aging population. Geriatrics & Gerontology International is now an international publication with contributions from around the world and published four times per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信