Measuring responsiveness and respectful treatment in maternity care in sub-Saharan Africa: a questionnaire validation and development of a score.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Zoë Morris, Soha El Halabi, Claudia Hanson, Bianca Kandeya, Elizabeth Ayebare, Gisele Houngbo, Anastasia Månsson, Fadhlun Alwy Al-Beity, Kristi Sidney Annerstedt
{"title":"Measuring responsiveness and respectful treatment in maternity care in sub-Saharan Africa: a questionnaire validation and development of a score.","authors":"Zoë Morris, Soha El Halabi, Claudia Hanson, Bianca Kandeya, Elizabeth Ayebare, Gisele Houngbo, Anastasia Månsson, Fadhlun Alwy Al-Beity, Kristi Sidney Annerstedt","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07319-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The importance of respectful maternity care on optimal maternal outcomes is increasingly acknowledged globally. However, mistreatment and abuse are still experienced by women during hospital childbirth in many parts of the world, with sub-Saharan Africa being one of the places where it is most common. Interventions aiming to improve respectful maternity care must be able to assess the prevalence of responsiveness and mistreatment women experience. This is usually done with questionnaires, though these are not always validated. Scores to represent the level of responsiveness and mistreatment experienced can be created from questionnaire results and have many uses, though no score is consistently used in this field. A new questionnaire measuring responsiveness and respectful treatment was developed for use in the ALERT project, as a questionnaire covering both of these concepts did not exist. This study aimed to validate this questionnaire and to create a scoring method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Psychometric analyses, including exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, were performed on cross-sectional data collected from the ALERT study to identify and confirm underlying factors. Using these factors, simple summation and factor-weighted methods were used to create scores and their results compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six factors were identified: \"Communication & supportive care\", \"Hospital environment\", \"Maintained respect & dignity\", \"Social support\", \"Maintained privacy & confidentiality\" and \"Lack of physical & verbal abuse\". The results of the two scoring methods developed were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The responsiveness and respectful treatment questionnaire has high validity in the ALERT study population for the six factors identified. The two scoring methods developed are useful for different aspects of the ALERT intervention and can be used to facilitate comparisons or measure progress towards improving respectful maternity care in these settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"329"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07319-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The importance of respectful maternity care on optimal maternal outcomes is increasingly acknowledged globally. However, mistreatment and abuse are still experienced by women during hospital childbirth in many parts of the world, with sub-Saharan Africa being one of the places where it is most common. Interventions aiming to improve respectful maternity care must be able to assess the prevalence of responsiveness and mistreatment women experience. This is usually done with questionnaires, though these are not always validated. Scores to represent the level of responsiveness and mistreatment experienced can be created from questionnaire results and have many uses, though no score is consistently used in this field. A new questionnaire measuring responsiveness and respectful treatment was developed for use in the ALERT project, as a questionnaire covering both of these concepts did not exist. This study aimed to validate this questionnaire and to create a scoring method.

Methods: Psychometric analyses, including exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, were performed on cross-sectional data collected from the ALERT study to identify and confirm underlying factors. Using these factors, simple summation and factor-weighted methods were used to create scores and their results compared.

Results: Six factors were identified: "Communication & supportive care", "Hospital environment", "Maintained respect & dignity", "Social support", "Maintained privacy & confidentiality" and "Lack of physical & verbal abuse". The results of the two scoring methods developed were similar.

Conclusions: The responsiveness and respectful treatment questionnaire has high validity in the ALERT study population for the six factors identified. The two scoring methods developed are useful for different aspects of the ALERT intervention and can be used to facilitate comparisons or measure progress towards improving respectful maternity care in these settings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信