Lourdes Álvarez-Sánchez, Laura Ferré-González, Carmen Peña-Bautista, Ángel Balaguer, Julián Luis Amengual, Miguel Baquero, Laura Cubas, Bonaventura Casanova, Consuelo Cháfer-Pericás
{"title":"New approach to specific Alzheimer's disease diagnosis based on plasma biomarkers in a cognitive disorder cohort.","authors":"Lourdes Álvarez-Sánchez, Laura Ferré-González, Carmen Peña-Bautista, Ángel Balaguer, Julián Luis Amengual, Miguel Baquero, Laura Cubas, Bonaventura Casanova, Consuelo Cháfer-Pericás","doi":"10.1111/eci.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The validation of a combination of plasma biomarkers and demographic variables is required to establish reliable cut-offs for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis (AD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Plasma biomarkers (Aβ42/Aβ40, p-Tau181, t-Tau, NfL, GFAP), ApoE genotype, and demographic variables were obtained from a retrospective clinical cohort of cognitive disorders (n = 478). These patients were diagnosed as AD (n = 254) or non-AD (n = 224) according to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42/Aβ40 levels. An analysis using a Ridge logistic regression model was performed to predict the occurrence of AD. The predictive performance of the model was assessed using the observations from a training set (70% of the sample) and validated using a test set (30% of the sample) in each group. Optimum cutoffs for the model were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model including plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, p-Tau181, GFAP, ApoE genotype and age was optimal for predicting CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 positivity (AUC .91, sensitivity .86, specificity .82). The model including only plasma biomarkers (Aβ42/Aβ40, p-Tau181, GFAP) provided reliable results (AUC .88, sensitivity .83, specificity .78). Also, GFAP, individually, showed the best performance in discriminating between AD and non-AD groups (AUC .859). The established cut-offs in a three-range strategy performed satisfactorily for the validated predictive model (probability) and individual plasma GFAP (concentration).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The plasma GFAP levels and the validated predictive model based on plasma biomarkers represent a relevant step toward the development of a potential clinical approach for AD diagnosis, which should be assessed in further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"e70034"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.70034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The validation of a combination of plasma biomarkers and demographic variables is required to establish reliable cut-offs for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis (AD).
Methods: Plasma biomarkers (Aβ42/Aβ40, p-Tau181, t-Tau, NfL, GFAP), ApoE genotype, and demographic variables were obtained from a retrospective clinical cohort of cognitive disorders (n = 478). These patients were diagnosed as AD (n = 254) or non-AD (n = 224) according to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42/Aβ40 levels. An analysis using a Ridge logistic regression model was performed to predict the occurrence of AD. The predictive performance of the model was assessed using the observations from a training set (70% of the sample) and validated using a test set (30% of the sample) in each group. Optimum cutoffs for the model were evaluated.
Results: The model including plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, p-Tau181, GFAP, ApoE genotype and age was optimal for predicting CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 positivity (AUC .91, sensitivity .86, specificity .82). The model including only plasma biomarkers (Aβ42/Aβ40, p-Tau181, GFAP) provided reliable results (AUC .88, sensitivity .83, specificity .78). Also, GFAP, individually, showed the best performance in discriminating between AD and non-AD groups (AUC .859). The established cut-offs in a three-range strategy performed satisfactorily for the validated predictive model (probability) and individual plasma GFAP (concentration).
Conclusions: The plasma GFAP levels and the validated predictive model based on plasma biomarkers represent a relevant step toward the development of a potential clinical approach for AD diagnosis, which should be assessed in further research.
期刊介绍:
EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.