Development and validation of the Chinese version of the adult sedentary behavior reduction intention questionnaire based on the theory of planned behavior.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jing Ye, Yaqin Li, Lili Yang
{"title":"Development and validation of the Chinese version of the adult sedentary behavior reduction intention questionnaire based on the theory of planned behavior.","authors":"Jing Ye, Yaqin Li, Lili Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-22301-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PROM: The Chinese version of the Adult Sedentary Behavior Reduction Intention Questionnaire, a 16-item self-reported tool based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), was developed to assess adults' intentions to reduce sedentary behavior.</p><p><strong>Measurement property: </strong>Internal consistency is used to measure the reliability of the questionnaire, while content and structural validity are studied to assess its validity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A mixed-methods exploratory sequential design with two phases.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>Adults aged over 18 years diagnosed with coronary heart disease, with a total daily sedentary time exceeding 6 h, normal cognitive function, and willingness to participate in the study were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in two phases. In Phase 1, an initial item pool was developed through a literature review and refined using two rounds of Delphi expert consultation. Expert positivity, authority levels (Cr), coefficients of variation (CV), and Kendall's W coefficient were calculated to assess representativeness, credibility, and consensus. A pilot study evaluated face validity and finalized the scale. In Phase 2, a cross-sectional study involving 316 participants was conducted to assess psychometric properties. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α and split-half reliability, while content validity was assessed using the content validity index (I-CVI). Construct validity was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phase 1 resulted in a preliminary questionnaire with four dimensions and 16 items. Sixteen experts completed two rounds of Delphi consultation, with high response rates (85% and 94.1%) and authority levels (Cr = 0.88 and 0.91). Consensus was strong (CV = 0.05 ~ 0.23; Kendall's W = 0.338 and 0.382, p < 0.001). Phase 2 validation showed a Cronbach's α of 0.967, with individual dimensions ranging from 0.911 to 0.950. I-CVI ranged from 0.813 to 1. The adjusted model indices met the fitting criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The developed questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool for assessing Chinese adults' intentions to reduce sedentary behavior. Grounded in TPB, it provides a theoretical foundation for future intervention studies aimed at addressing sedentary lifestyles.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1093"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929290/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22301-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PROM: The Chinese version of the Adult Sedentary Behavior Reduction Intention Questionnaire, a 16-item self-reported tool based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), was developed to assess adults' intentions to reduce sedentary behavior.

Measurement property: Internal consistency is used to measure the reliability of the questionnaire, while content and structural validity are studied to assess its validity.

Design: A mixed-methods exploratory sequential design with two phases.

Sample: Adults aged over 18 years diagnosed with coronary heart disease, with a total daily sedentary time exceeding 6 h, normal cognitive function, and willingness to participate in the study were included.

Methods: The study was conducted in two phases. In Phase 1, an initial item pool was developed through a literature review and refined using two rounds of Delphi expert consultation. Expert positivity, authority levels (Cr), coefficients of variation (CV), and Kendall's W coefficient were calculated to assess representativeness, credibility, and consensus. A pilot study evaluated face validity and finalized the scale. In Phase 2, a cross-sectional study involving 316 participants was conducted to assess psychometric properties. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α and split-half reliability, while content validity was assessed using the content validity index (I-CVI). Construct validity was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

Results: Phase 1 resulted in a preliminary questionnaire with four dimensions and 16 items. Sixteen experts completed two rounds of Delphi consultation, with high response rates (85% and 94.1%) and authority levels (Cr = 0.88 and 0.91). Consensus was strong (CV = 0.05 ~ 0.23; Kendall's W = 0.338 and 0.382, p < 0.001). Phase 2 validation showed a Cronbach's α of 0.967, with individual dimensions ranging from 0.911 to 0.950. I-CVI ranged from 0.813 to 1. The adjusted model indices met the fitting criteria.

Conclusions: The developed questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool for assessing Chinese adults' intentions to reduce sedentary behavior. Grounded in TPB, it provides a theoretical foundation for future intervention studies aimed at addressing sedentary lifestyles.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信