Let's get in sync: current standing and future of AI-based detection of patient-ventilator asynchrony.

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Thijs P Rietveld, Björn J P van der Ster, Abraham Schoe, Henrik Endeman, Anton Balakirev, Daria Kozlova, Diederik A M P J Gommers, Annemijn H Jonkman
{"title":"Let's get in sync: current standing and future of AI-based detection of patient-ventilator asynchrony.","authors":"Thijs P Rietveld, Björn J P van der Ster, Abraham Schoe, Henrik Endeman, Anton Balakirev, Daria Kozlova, Diederik A M P J Gommers, Annemijn H Jonkman","doi":"10.1186/s40635-025-00746-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is a mismatch between the patient's respiratory drive/effort and the ventilator breath delivery. It occurs frequently in mechanically ventilated patients and has been associated with adverse events and increased duration of ventilation. Identifying PVA through visual inspection of ventilator waveforms is highly challenging and time-consuming. Automated PVA detection using Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been increasingly studied, potentially offering real-time monitoring at the bedside. In this review, we discuss advances in automatic detection of PVA, focusing on developments of the last 15 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies were identified. Multiple forms of AI have been used for the automated detection of PVA, including rule-based algorithms, machine learning and deep learning. Three licensed algorithms are currently reported. Results of algorithms are generally promising (average reported sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 0.80, 0.93 and 0.92, respectively), but most algorithms are only available offline, can detect a small subset of PVAs (focusing mostly on ineffective effort and double trigger asynchronies), or remain in the development or validation stage (84% (16/19 of the reviewed studies)). Moreover, only in 58% (11/19) of the studies a reference method for monitoring patient's breathing effort was available. To move from bench to bedside implementation, data quality should be improved and algorithms that can detect multiple PVAs should be externally validated, incorporating measures for breathing effort as ground truth. Last, prospective integration and model testing/finetuning in different ICU settings is key.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI-based techniques for automated PVA detection are increasingly studied and show potential. For widespread implementation to succeed, several steps, including external validation and (near) real-time employment, should be considered. Then, automated PVA detection could aid in monitoring and mitigating PVAs, to eventually optimize personalized mechanical ventilation, improve clinical outcomes and reduce clinician's workload.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"13 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00746-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is a mismatch between the patient's respiratory drive/effort and the ventilator breath delivery. It occurs frequently in mechanically ventilated patients and has been associated with adverse events and increased duration of ventilation. Identifying PVA through visual inspection of ventilator waveforms is highly challenging and time-consuming. Automated PVA detection using Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been increasingly studied, potentially offering real-time monitoring at the bedside. In this review, we discuss advances in automatic detection of PVA, focusing on developments of the last 15 years.

Results: Nineteen studies were identified. Multiple forms of AI have been used for the automated detection of PVA, including rule-based algorithms, machine learning and deep learning. Three licensed algorithms are currently reported. Results of algorithms are generally promising (average reported sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 0.80, 0.93 and 0.92, respectively), but most algorithms are only available offline, can detect a small subset of PVAs (focusing mostly on ineffective effort and double trigger asynchronies), or remain in the development or validation stage (84% (16/19 of the reviewed studies)). Moreover, only in 58% (11/19) of the studies a reference method for monitoring patient's breathing effort was available. To move from bench to bedside implementation, data quality should be improved and algorithms that can detect multiple PVAs should be externally validated, incorporating measures for breathing effort as ground truth. Last, prospective integration and model testing/finetuning in different ICU settings is key.

Conclusions: AI-based techniques for automated PVA detection are increasingly studied and show potential. For widespread implementation to succeed, several steps, including external validation and (near) real-time employment, should be considered. Then, automated PVA detection could aid in monitoring and mitigating PVAs, to eventually optimize personalized mechanical ventilation, improve clinical outcomes and reduce clinician's workload.

让我们同步起来:基于人工智能的患者-呼吸机异步检测的现状和未来。
背景:患者-呼吸机不同步(PVA)是患者呼吸驱动/努力与呼吸机呼吸输送之间的不匹配。它常见于机械通气患者,并与不良事件和通气时间延长有关。通过目视检查呼吸机波形来识别PVA是非常具有挑战性和耗时的。使用人工智能(AI)进行PVA自动检测的研究越来越多,有可能在床边提供实时监测。本文综述了近15年来PVA自动检测的研究进展。结果:确定了19项研究。多种形式的人工智能已被用于PVA的自动检测,包括基于规则的算法、机器学习和深度学习。目前报告了三种许可算法。算法的结果总体上是有希望的(报告的平均灵敏度、特异性和准确性分别为0.80、0.93和0.92),但大多数算法只能离线使用,只能检测一小部分pva(主要关注无效努力和双触发异步),或者仍处于开发或验证阶段(84%(16/19的综述研究))。此外,只有58%(11/19)的研究提供了监测患者呼吸努力的参考方法。为了从实验台转移到床边实施,数据质量应该得到改善,可以检测多个pva的算法应该得到外部验证,并将呼吸努力的测量作为基础事实。最后,在不同的ICU环境中进行前瞻性整合和模型测试/微调是关键。结论:基于人工智能的PVA自动检测技术得到了越来越多的研究,并显示出潜力。为了成功地广泛实施,应该考虑几个步骤,包括外部验证和(近)实时使用。然后,自动化PVA检测可以帮助监测和减轻PVA,最终优化个性化机械通气,改善临床结果,减少临床医生的工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信