Comparable clinical outcome with greater thickness and lesser re-tear rate following allogenous dermal scaffold augmentation for large to massive rotator cuff tears: a retrospective case-controlled study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Hyunseong Kang, Seung Jin Yoo, Joseph Yang, Kyung Ryeol Lee, Sungwook Choi
{"title":"Comparable clinical outcome with greater thickness and lesser re-tear rate following allogenous dermal scaffold augmentation for large to massive rotator cuff tears: a retrospective case-controlled study.","authors":"Hyunseong Kang, Seung Jin Yoo, Joseph Yang, Kyung Ryeol Lee, Sungwook Choi","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05696-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allogenous dermal scaffold augmentation enhances partial rotator cuff repairs by providing structural support and a biologic scaffold that promotes tissue regeneration, reduces mechanical strain, and compensates for poor tendon quality in large to massive rotator cuff tears. This approach helps lower the risk of retear and improves functional recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 55 patients with large to massive rotator cuff tears, divided into two groups. Group A (28 patients) underwent arthroscopic partial repair, while Group B (27 patients) received allogenous dermal scaffold graft augmentation following partial repair to reinforce the repair and resurface the uncovered tendon footprint. Clinical assessments, including the University of California-Los Angeles score, Constant-Murley score, and visual analogue scale, were conducted preoperatively, at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter. Radiologic evaluations, including magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography, were performed preoperatively and postoperatively to assess tendon integrity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up period was 40 months for Group A and 36 months for Group B. Clinical functional scores significantly improved in both groups at the final follow-up. Postoperative radiologic assessment showed 9 retears in Group A and 4 in Group B (p < 0.05), respectively, with significantly greater postoperative tendon thickness in Group B compared to Group A (p-value < 0.05). Additionally, acromiohumeral distance improved significantly in both groups, from 7 mm to 9 mm in Group A and from 7 mm to 11 mm in Group B, with Group B demonstrating superior improvement (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that allogenous dermal scaffold graft augmentation, in addition to partial repair, enhances tendon thickness and acromiohumeral distance. Furthermore, it results in lower retear rates compared to partial repair alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05696-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allogenous dermal scaffold augmentation enhances partial rotator cuff repairs by providing structural support and a biologic scaffold that promotes tissue regeneration, reduces mechanical strain, and compensates for poor tendon quality in large to massive rotator cuff tears. This approach helps lower the risk of retear and improves functional recovery.

Methods: This study included 55 patients with large to massive rotator cuff tears, divided into two groups. Group A (28 patients) underwent arthroscopic partial repair, while Group B (27 patients) received allogenous dermal scaffold graft augmentation following partial repair to reinforce the repair and resurface the uncovered tendon footprint. Clinical assessments, including the University of California-Los Angeles score, Constant-Murley score, and visual analogue scale, were conducted preoperatively, at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter. Radiologic evaluations, including magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography, were performed preoperatively and postoperatively to assess tendon integrity.

Results: The mean follow-up period was 40 months for Group A and 36 months for Group B. Clinical functional scores significantly improved in both groups at the final follow-up. Postoperative radiologic assessment showed 9 retears in Group A and 4 in Group B (p < 0.05), respectively, with significantly greater postoperative tendon thickness in Group B compared to Group A (p-value < 0.05). Additionally, acromiohumeral distance improved significantly in both groups, from 7 mm to 9 mm in Group A and from 7 mm to 11 mm in Group B, with Group B demonstrating superior improvement (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: This study suggests that allogenous dermal scaffold graft augmentation, in addition to partial repair, enhances tendon thickness and acromiohumeral distance. Furthermore, it results in lower retear rates compared to partial repair alone.

一项回顾性病例对照研究:同种异体真皮支架增强治疗大到大面积肩袖撕裂后,具有更大厚度和更小再撕裂率的可比临床结果。
背景:同种异体真皮支架增强通过提供结构支持和生物支架促进组织再生,减少机械应变,并补偿大到大面积肩袖撕裂时肌腱质量差,从而增强部分肩袖修复。这种方法有助于降低复发的风险,提高功能恢复。方法:55例肩袖撕裂患者分为两组。A组(28例)接受关节镜局部修复,B组(27例)在部分修复后接受同种异体真皮支架增强,以加强修复并使未覆盖的肌腱足迹重新表面。临床评估包括加州大学洛杉矶分校评分、Constant-Murley评分和视觉模拟量表,分别在术前、术后3、6和12个月以及此后每年进行。术前和术后进行放射学评估,包括磁共振成像和超声检查,以评估肌腱完整性。结果:A组平均随访时间为40个月,b组平均随访时间为36个月。末次随访时,两组患者临床功能评分均有明显改善。术后放射学评估显示A组9例,B组4例(p)结论:本研究提示同种异体真皮支架增强除部分修复外,还能增强肌腱厚度和肩肱距离。此外,与单独部分修复相比,它的修复率更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信