Critisism of the Scholastic Approach in Researching Novel Adsorbents for Water Purification

IF 0.5 4区 化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
S. K. Smolin, A. V. Sinel’nikova
{"title":"Critisism of the Scholastic Approach in Researching Novel Adsorbents for Water Purification","authors":"S. K. Smolin,&nbsp;A. V. Sinel’nikova","doi":"10.3103/S1063455X25010114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past two decades, many scientific journals have published a series of articles on environmental topics, which follow a similar pattern for studying adsorption on new materials. A review of more than 30 articles (as well as review practices), primarily focusing on the adsorption of synthetic organic compounds on new activated carbon materials, identifies the stages of scholarly research and highlights the main methodological and theoretical errors. These errors undermine the scientific value of these studies and reduce the experimental data presented within them to the status of scientific spam. The term “scholasticism” is used here in the sense of “pedantry,” “unified” nonessential research tasks, and excessive pondering over known or trivial matters. These issues point to gaps in the theoretical and practical training of young researchers. A typical feature of the scholastic approach is identified: instead of determining the conventional universal adsorption isotherm, the focus is on studying the influence of initial concentration, adsorbent weight, particle size, and contact time on adsorption efficiency—trends that are already well known to specialists. The epistemological significance and necessity of the stage of modeling experimental isotherms using both classical (Langmuir and Freundlich) and modern equations are critically evaluated. The paper presents a unique perspective on the role and objectives of modeling. The scholastic approach in kinetics relies on a formal description of rate laws, which predominantly ignore the physical nature of the adsorption of organic, especially aromatic, compounds, the hydrodynamics of flow, the fractional state of the adsorbent, the multistep nature of the process, and its limiting stage. The typical and characteristic inaccuracy of thermodynamic calculations in works exhibiting features of scholarly pedantry is highlighted, with the cause identified as the incorrect determination of the adsorption equilibrium constant, <i>K</i><sub>e</sub>. The paper gives specific methodological recommendations for environmental researchers, for whom adsorption-based water purification presents a new challenge, to avoid scholastic errors in their experimental endeavors and preserve the scientific value of their future work.</p>","PeriodicalId":680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology","volume":"47 1","pages":"9 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S1063455X25010114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past two decades, many scientific journals have published a series of articles on environmental topics, which follow a similar pattern for studying adsorption on new materials. A review of more than 30 articles (as well as review practices), primarily focusing on the adsorption of synthetic organic compounds on new activated carbon materials, identifies the stages of scholarly research and highlights the main methodological and theoretical errors. These errors undermine the scientific value of these studies and reduce the experimental data presented within them to the status of scientific spam. The term “scholasticism” is used here in the sense of “pedantry,” “unified” nonessential research tasks, and excessive pondering over known or trivial matters. These issues point to gaps in the theoretical and practical training of young researchers. A typical feature of the scholastic approach is identified: instead of determining the conventional universal adsorption isotherm, the focus is on studying the influence of initial concentration, adsorbent weight, particle size, and contact time on adsorption efficiency—trends that are already well known to specialists. The epistemological significance and necessity of the stage of modeling experimental isotherms using both classical (Langmuir and Freundlich) and modern equations are critically evaluated. The paper presents a unique perspective on the role and objectives of modeling. The scholastic approach in kinetics relies on a formal description of rate laws, which predominantly ignore the physical nature of the adsorption of organic, especially aromatic, compounds, the hydrodynamics of flow, the fractional state of the adsorbent, the multistep nature of the process, and its limiting stage. The typical and characteristic inaccuracy of thermodynamic calculations in works exhibiting features of scholarly pedantry is highlighted, with the cause identified as the incorrect determination of the adsorption equilibrium constant, Ke. The paper gives specific methodological recommendations for environmental researchers, for whom adsorption-based water purification presents a new challenge, to avoid scholastic errors in their experimental endeavors and preserve the scientific value of their future work.

对研究新型水净化吸附剂的学术方法的批判
在过去的二十年里,许多科学期刊发表了一系列关于环境主题的文章,这些文章遵循了研究新材料吸附的类似模式。本文回顾了30多篇文章(以及回顾实践),主要关注合成有机化合物在新型活性炭材料上的吸附,确定了学术研究的阶段,并强调了主要的方法和理论错误。这些错误破坏了这些研究的科学价值,并将其中提供的实验数据降低到科学垃圾的地位。这里所说的“经院哲学”是指“迂腐”、“一元化”的非必要的研究任务,以及对已知或琐碎的事情的过度思考。这些问题表明了对年轻研究人员的理论和实践培训存在差距。确定了学术方法的一个典型特征:而不是确定传统的通用吸附等温线,重点是研究初始浓度、吸附剂重量、粒度和接触时间对吸附效率的影响,这些趋势已经为专家所熟知。认识论的意义和使用经典(朗缪尔和Freundlich)和现代方程模拟实验等温线阶段的必要性进行了批判性评估。本文对建模的作用和目标提出了独特的观点。动力学的学术方法依赖于速率定律的形式化描述,这主要忽略了有机,特别是芳香化合物的吸附的物理性质,流动的流体动力学,吸附剂的分数状态,过程的多步骤性质及其限制阶段。强调了热力学计算的典型和典型的不准确,并指出其原因是吸附平衡常数Ke的确定不正确。本文为环境研究人员提供了具体的方法建议,以避免他们在实验中出现学术错误,并保持他们未来工作的科学价值,对基于吸附的水净化提出了新的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology
Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology CHEMISTRY, APPLIED-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology focuses on water and wastewater treatment, water pollution monitoring, water purification, and similar topics. The journal publishes original scientific theoretical and experimental articles in the following sections: new developments in the science of water; theoretical principles of water treatment and technology; physical chemistry of water treatment processes; analytical water chemistry; analysis of natural and waste waters; water treatment technology and demineralization of water; biological methods of water treatment; and also solicited critical reviews summarizing the latest findings. The journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English or Ukrainian language. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信