Comparison on Thermal Runaway and Critical Characteristics of Cylindrical Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Review

Wei Li, Jiasheng Wang, Chunfeng Sun, Xiaoping Fan, Lingzhu Gong*, Jiale Huang*, Jian-heng Wu, Gending Yu, Rongguo Chen, Jingling Li and Yih-Shing Duh*, 
{"title":"Comparison on Thermal Runaway and Critical Characteristics of Cylindrical Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Review","authors":"Wei Li,&nbsp;Jiasheng Wang,&nbsp;Chunfeng Sun,&nbsp;Xiaoping Fan,&nbsp;Lingzhu Gong*,&nbsp;Jiale Huang*,&nbsp;Jian-heng Wu,&nbsp;Gending Yu,&nbsp;Rongguo Chen,&nbsp;Jingling Li and Yih-Shing Duh*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.chas.4c0012110.1021/acs.chas.4c00121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The thermal hazard results of commercial cylindrical lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) of different sizes from international laboratories are reviewed and discussed. The four types discussed encompass 14500, 18650, 21700, and 26650 ones. Characteristic data from the calorimeter include onset temperature, critical temperature, maximum temperature, maximum self-heat rate, enthalpy change, and quantity of noncondensable gases. By integrating thermal hazard data, a box-plot was established and hazard ranking was clearly evaluated as 21700 &gt; 18650 non-LiFePO<sub>4</sub> (LFP) ≫ 26650 LFP &gt; 14500 non-LFP &gt; 18650 LFP &gt; 14500 LFP. Among all types of cylindrical lithium-ion batteries, the 21700 exhibits the worst consequence, which is attributed to the adoption of high energy density LiNi<sub>0.8</sub>Co<sub>0.15</sub>Al<sub>0.05</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (NCA) and LiNi<sub><i>x</i></sub>Mn<sub><i>y</i></sub>Co<sub><i>z</i></sub>O<sub>2</sub> (NMC) cathode materials. It was found that the critical temperature <i>T</i><sub>cr</sub> and maximum temperature broadly scattered; besides, most of the maximum self-heat rate (d<i>T</i>/d<i>t</i>) and pressure data were absent in literature. Definitions of onset temperature, critical temperature, trigger temperature, and possible heat sources to stimulate the severe thermal runaway were collected and found to be unimaginably divergent. A thermal analysis database was established to classify critical temperatures into high <i>T</i><sub>cr</sub> (above 180 °C), low <i>T</i><sub>cr</sub> (130–180 °C), and no <i>T</i><sub>cr</sub>. The low <i>T</i><sub>cr</sub> inducement is speculated to be caused by gas shock or electron breakdown after the separator melted, while the intrinsic characteristics of <i>T</i><sub>cr</sub> require further investigation. Thermal runaway features of cylindrical LIBs can be concisely classified as lowest <i>T</i><sub>onset</sub> of 88.0 °C (21700 NMC) vs highest <i>T</i><sub>onset</sub> of 220.0 °C (18650 LFP), highest (d<i>T</i>/d<i>t</i>)<sub>max</sub> of 64536.0 °C min<sup>–1</sup> (21700 NCA) vs lowest (d<i>T</i>/d<i>t</i>)<sub>max</sub> of 3.0 °C min<sup>–1</sup> (18650 LFP), highest <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> of 1257.9 °C (21700 NCA) vs lowest <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> of 243.2 °C (18650 LFP), highest Δ<i>n</i> of 314.0 mmol (18650 NCA) vs lowest Δ<i>n</i> of 23.3 mmol (14500 LFP), lowest <i>T</i><sub>cr</sub> of 145.5 °C (21700 NCA) vs (no <i>T</i><sub>cr</sub>) (14500 and 18650 LFP), and highest Δ<i>H</i> of 70.5 kJ (21700 NCA) vs lowest Δ<i>H</i> of 0.8 kJ (14500 LFP). In this work, the present research is reviewed in detail and future perspectives are proposed. This review on the critical characteristics of cylindrical batteries under thermal failure and thermal abuse provides a reference for solving intrinsic safety issues for lithium-ion batteries of the next generation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chemical health & safety","volume":"32 2","pages":"133–156 133–156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chemical health & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chas.4c00121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The thermal hazard results of commercial cylindrical lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) of different sizes from international laboratories are reviewed and discussed. The four types discussed encompass 14500, 18650, 21700, and 26650 ones. Characteristic data from the calorimeter include onset temperature, critical temperature, maximum temperature, maximum self-heat rate, enthalpy change, and quantity of noncondensable gases. By integrating thermal hazard data, a box-plot was established and hazard ranking was clearly evaluated as 21700 > 18650 non-LiFePO4 (LFP) ≫ 26650 LFP > 14500 non-LFP > 18650 LFP > 14500 LFP. Among all types of cylindrical lithium-ion batteries, the 21700 exhibits the worst consequence, which is attributed to the adoption of high energy density LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 (NCA) and LiNixMnyCozO2 (NMC) cathode materials. It was found that the critical temperature Tcr and maximum temperature broadly scattered; besides, most of the maximum self-heat rate (dT/dt) and pressure data were absent in literature. Definitions of onset temperature, critical temperature, trigger temperature, and possible heat sources to stimulate the severe thermal runaway were collected and found to be unimaginably divergent. A thermal analysis database was established to classify critical temperatures into high Tcr (above 180 °C), low Tcr (130–180 °C), and no Tcr. The low Tcr inducement is speculated to be caused by gas shock or electron breakdown after the separator melted, while the intrinsic characteristics of Tcr require further investigation. Thermal runaway features of cylindrical LIBs can be concisely classified as lowest Tonset of 88.0 °C (21700 NMC) vs highest Tonset of 220.0 °C (18650 LFP), highest (dT/dt)max of 64536.0 °C min–1 (21700 NCA) vs lowest (dT/dt)max of 3.0 °C min–1 (18650 LFP), highest Tmax of 1257.9 °C (21700 NCA) vs lowest Tmax of 243.2 °C (18650 LFP), highest Δn of 314.0 mmol (18650 NCA) vs lowest Δn of 23.3 mmol (14500 LFP), lowest Tcr of 145.5 °C (21700 NCA) vs (no Tcr) (14500 and 18650 LFP), and highest ΔH of 70.5 kJ (21700 NCA) vs lowest ΔH of 0.8 kJ (14500 LFP). In this work, the present research is reviewed in detail and future perspectives are proposed. This review on the critical characteristics of cylindrical batteries under thermal failure and thermal abuse provides a reference for solving intrinsic safety issues for lithium-ion batteries of the next generation.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信