Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions from Standard and “Eco” Resins for Vat Photopolymerization Additive Manufacturing (“3D”) Printers and Potential Mitigation Strategies

Justin P. Miller-Schulze*,  and , Nicholas D. Williams, 
{"title":"Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions from Standard and “Eco” Resins for Vat Photopolymerization Additive Manufacturing (“3D”) Printers and Potential Mitigation Strategies","authors":"Justin P. Miller-Schulze*,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Nicholas D. Williams,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.chas.4c0008710.1021/acs.chas.4c00087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The chemical profile and magnitude of emissions from vat photopolymerization (VP) 3D printers, in which a liquid resin cures into a solid upon exposure to ultraviolet light, are understudied. Here, six Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs) were identified in emissions from an entry-level VP printer using both Standard and “Eco” resin formulations and quantified in four phases of the VP printing process. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to assess emissions of “Eco” resins. Two shapes were printed to assess the impact of the surface area on emissions. Emissions were greatest for two monomers, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate and 4-acrylomorpholine. Mesitaldehyde, tolylene-2,4-diisocyanate, 2,6-di-<i>tert</i>-butyl-p-cresol, and dipropylene glycol diacrylate emissions were more consistent. Generally, Standard resin emissions exceeded Eco resin emissions. Object surface area did not have a clear impact on emissions. Similar or higher emissions from idle printers with an uncovered resin vat compared to emissions from active printing were observed. For the first time, it was demonstrated that idle printer emissions were reduced drastically (by 70–97%) using a fabricated vat lid, demonstrating the importance of a sealed resin vat to reduce VOC emissions. Where available, reference exposure limits for the VOCs measured were compared with total emissions; this analysis indicated that these emission rates lead to exposures approaching or exceeding available exposure thresholds. These results show that a simple mitigation strategy and, to a lesser extent, the use of a low-VOC resin should lower the emissions of VP printers and, as such, reduce VOC exposures for the users of VP Printers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chemical health & safety","volume":"32 2","pages":"175–185 175–185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.chas.4c00087","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chemical health & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chas.4c00087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chemical profile and magnitude of emissions from vat photopolymerization (VP) 3D printers, in which a liquid resin cures into a solid upon exposure to ultraviolet light, are understudied. Here, six Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs) were identified in emissions from an entry-level VP printer using both Standard and “Eco” resin formulations and quantified in four phases of the VP printing process. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to assess emissions of “Eco” resins. Two shapes were printed to assess the impact of the surface area on emissions. Emissions were greatest for two monomers, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate and 4-acrylomorpholine. Mesitaldehyde, tolylene-2,4-diisocyanate, 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol, and dipropylene glycol diacrylate emissions were more consistent. Generally, Standard resin emissions exceeded Eco resin emissions. Object surface area did not have a clear impact on emissions. Similar or higher emissions from idle printers with an uncovered resin vat compared to emissions from active printing were observed. For the first time, it was demonstrated that idle printer emissions were reduced drastically (by 70–97%) using a fabricated vat lid, demonstrating the importance of a sealed resin vat to reduce VOC emissions. Where available, reference exposure limits for the VOCs measured were compared with total emissions; this analysis indicated that these emission rates lead to exposures approaching or exceeding available exposure thresholds. These results show that a simple mitigation strategy and, to a lesser extent, the use of a low-VOC resin should lower the emissions of VP printers and, as such, reduce VOC exposures for the users of VP Printers.

用于大桶光聚合增材制造("3D")打印机的标准树脂和 "环保 "树脂的挥发性有机化学物排放及潜在缓解策略
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信