Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions from Standard and “Eco” Resins for Vat Photopolymerization Additive Manufacturing (“3D”) Printers and Potential Mitigation Strategies

IF 3.4
Justin P. Miller-Schulze*,  and , Nicholas D. Williams, 
{"title":"Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions from Standard and “Eco” Resins for Vat Photopolymerization Additive Manufacturing (“3D”) Printers and Potential Mitigation Strategies","authors":"Justin P. Miller-Schulze*,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Nicholas D. Williams,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.chas.4c0008710.1021/acs.chas.4c00087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The chemical profile and magnitude of emissions from vat photopolymerization (VP) 3D printers, in which a liquid resin cures into a solid upon exposure to ultraviolet light, are understudied. Here, six Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs) were identified in emissions from an entry-level VP printer using both Standard and “Eco” resin formulations and quantified in four phases of the VP printing process. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to assess emissions of “Eco” resins. Two shapes were printed to assess the impact of the surface area on emissions. Emissions were greatest for two monomers, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate and 4-acrylomorpholine. Mesitaldehyde, tolylene-2,4-diisocyanate, 2,6-di-<i>tert</i>-butyl-p-cresol, and dipropylene glycol diacrylate emissions were more consistent. Generally, Standard resin emissions exceeded Eco resin emissions. Object surface area did not have a clear impact on emissions. Similar or higher emissions from idle printers with an uncovered resin vat compared to emissions from active printing were observed. For the first time, it was demonstrated that idle printer emissions were reduced drastically (by 70–97%) using a fabricated vat lid, demonstrating the importance of a sealed resin vat to reduce VOC emissions. Where available, reference exposure limits for the VOCs measured were compared with total emissions; this analysis indicated that these emission rates lead to exposures approaching or exceeding available exposure thresholds. These results show that a simple mitigation strategy and, to a lesser extent, the use of a low-VOC resin should lower the emissions of VP printers and, as such, reduce VOC exposures for the users of VP Printers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chemical health & safety","volume":"32 2","pages":"175–185 175–185"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.chas.4c00087","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chemical health & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chas.4c00087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chemical profile and magnitude of emissions from vat photopolymerization (VP) 3D printers, in which a liquid resin cures into a solid upon exposure to ultraviolet light, are understudied. Here, six Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs) were identified in emissions from an entry-level VP printer using both Standard and “Eco” resin formulations and quantified in four phases of the VP printing process. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to assess emissions of “Eco” resins. Two shapes were printed to assess the impact of the surface area on emissions. Emissions were greatest for two monomers, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate and 4-acrylomorpholine. Mesitaldehyde, tolylene-2,4-diisocyanate, 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol, and dipropylene glycol diacrylate emissions were more consistent. Generally, Standard resin emissions exceeded Eco resin emissions. Object surface area did not have a clear impact on emissions. Similar or higher emissions from idle printers with an uncovered resin vat compared to emissions from active printing were observed. For the first time, it was demonstrated that idle printer emissions were reduced drastically (by 70–97%) using a fabricated vat lid, demonstrating the importance of a sealed resin vat to reduce VOC emissions. Where available, reference exposure limits for the VOCs measured were compared with total emissions; this analysis indicated that these emission rates lead to exposures approaching or exceeding available exposure thresholds. These results show that a simple mitigation strategy and, to a lesser extent, the use of a low-VOC resin should lower the emissions of VP printers and, as such, reduce VOC exposures for the users of VP Printers.

用于大桶光聚合增材制造("3D")打印机的标准树脂和 "环保 "树脂的挥发性有机化学物排放及潜在缓解策略
在还原光聚合(VP) 3D打印机中,液体树脂在紫外线照射下固化成固体,其化学特征和排放量尚未得到充分研究。在这里,使用标准和“生态”树脂配方的入门级VP打印机在排放物中发现了六种挥发性有机化学物质(VOCs),并在VP打印过程的四个阶段进行了量化。据我们所知,这项工作是第一次评估“生态”树脂的排放。打印了两种形状来评估表面面积对排放的影响。2-羟乙基丙烯酸酯和4-丙烯omorpholine这两种单体的排放量最大。甲二醛、甲苯-2,4-二异氰酸酯、2,6-二叔丁基-对甲酚和二丙二醇二丙烯酸酯的排放量更为一致。一般来说,标准树脂排放量超过生态树脂排放量。物体表面积对排放物没有明显的影响。观察到与活跃印刷的排放相比,未覆盖树脂缸的闲置打印机的排放相似或更高。首次证明,使用制造的大桶盖可以大幅减少闲置打印机的排放(减少70-97%),这证明了密封树脂大桶减少VOC排放的重要性。在可能的情况下,将测量到的挥发性有机化合物的参考暴露限值与总排放量进行比较;这一分析表明,这些排放率导致接触接近或超过可用的接触阈值。这些结果表明,一个简单的缓解策略,以及在较小程度上使用低VOC树脂,应降低VP打印机的排放,从而减少VP打印机用户的VOC暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信