Environmentality and the making of compliant subjects: Insights from collaborative forest management innovations in Southwestern Ghana

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Ransford Sackey , Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey , Eric Mensah Kumeh , Joana Akua Serwaa Ameyaw
{"title":"Environmentality and the making of compliant subjects: Insights from collaborative forest management innovations in Southwestern Ghana","authors":"Ransford Sackey ,&nbsp;Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey ,&nbsp;Eric Mensah Kumeh ,&nbsp;Joana Akua Serwaa Ameyaw","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shifting from a coercive to a collaborative approach that engenders equity in processes and outcomes from forest management remains an aspiration in forest governance in many countries. Whereas several studies have analyzed how national policy changes and international developments collectively influence this change, the nature of the subjects created by the transition remains an open question. Drawing on the literature on governmentality and environmentality, we develop a framework along a compliant-resistance axis to analyze the different subjects created by two collaborative forest management innovations in Ghana: the modified taungya system and community forest monitoring. Analyzing data from 37 key informant interviews and three focus groups in a priority biodiversity hotspot of the country, the Krokosua Hills Forest Reserve, we identified four main types of subjects emerging from both initiatives: participatory, transformative, opportunistic and passive. Opportunistic subjects embrace both initiatives as a legitimate cover to encroach upon and convert various forest reserve areas to farmlands. Transformative subjects, such as <em>environpreneurs</em>, leverage both initiatives to establish \"green businesses\" that support forest rehabilitation and provide non-forest products, reducing people's dependency on the protected area. However, the subjects we identified neither adequately question the power of the state or non-governmental organizations over forest management nor challenge the inequalities these actors create when they restrict forest-fringe communities' access to their local environment while simultaneously opening these spaces to timber contractors and foreign investors under various schemes. Understanding the conditions that enable forest-fringe communities to overcome this challenge is an area for further study. Such insights are essential for promoting equity in ways that repair relationships between power-differentiated actors and their local environment, ultimately enabling nature recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 103475"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125000541","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shifting from a coercive to a collaborative approach that engenders equity in processes and outcomes from forest management remains an aspiration in forest governance in many countries. Whereas several studies have analyzed how national policy changes and international developments collectively influence this change, the nature of the subjects created by the transition remains an open question. Drawing on the literature on governmentality and environmentality, we develop a framework along a compliant-resistance axis to analyze the different subjects created by two collaborative forest management innovations in Ghana: the modified taungya system and community forest monitoring. Analyzing data from 37 key informant interviews and three focus groups in a priority biodiversity hotspot of the country, the Krokosua Hills Forest Reserve, we identified four main types of subjects emerging from both initiatives: participatory, transformative, opportunistic and passive. Opportunistic subjects embrace both initiatives as a legitimate cover to encroach upon and convert various forest reserve areas to farmlands. Transformative subjects, such as environpreneurs, leverage both initiatives to establish "green businesses" that support forest rehabilitation and provide non-forest products, reducing people's dependency on the protected area. However, the subjects we identified neither adequately question the power of the state or non-governmental organizations over forest management nor challenge the inequalities these actors create when they restrict forest-fringe communities' access to their local environment while simultaneously opening these spaces to timber contractors and foreign investors under various schemes. Understanding the conditions that enable forest-fringe communities to overcome this challenge is an area for further study. Such insights are essential for promoting equity in ways that repair relationships between power-differentiated actors and their local environment, ultimately enabling nature recovery.
环境和顺从主体的制定:来自加纳西南部合作森林管理创新的见解
从强制方式转向协作方式,实现森林管理过程和结果的公平,仍然是许多国家森林治理的愿望。虽然有几项研究分析了国家政策变化和国际发展如何共同影响这一变化,但过渡所产生的主题的性质仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。根据关于治理和环境的文献,我们沿着顺从-抵抗轴开发了一个框架,以分析加纳两项合作森林管理创新所产生的不同主题:改进的taungya系统和社区森林监测。我们分析了来自37个关键信息者访谈和三个焦点小组的数据,这些小组位于该国的一个优先生物多样性热点地区——Krokosua山森林保护区,我们确定了这两个倡议中出现的四种主要类型的主题:参与式、变革性、机会主义和被动。投机主体接受这两项倡议,作为侵占各种森林保护区并将其转化为农田的合法掩护。环境企业家等变革主体利用这两项倡议建立“绿色企业”,支持森林恢复并提供非森林产品,减少人们对保护区的依赖。然而,我们确定的主题既没有充分质疑国家或非政府组织在森林管理方面的权力,也没有挑战这些行为者在限制森林边缘社区进入当地环境的同时,根据各种计划向木材承包商和外国投资者开放这些空间所造成的不平等。了解使森林边缘社区能够克服这一挑战的条件是一个需要进一步研究的领域。这些洞见对于促进公平至关重要,有助于修复权力差异行为体与当地环境之间的关系,最终实现自然恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信