Permeability of granitic drill core tested by steady flow and transient flow gas permeameter probes: Improvements to methods and applications

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
J. Scibek , T. Kubo , K. Koike , P. Achtziger-Zupančič
{"title":"Permeability of granitic drill core tested by steady flow and transient flow gas permeameter probes: Improvements to methods and applications","authors":"J. Scibek ,&nbsp;T. Kubo ,&nbsp;K. Koike ,&nbsp;P. Achtziger-Zupančič","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The permeability of undeformed, deformed and/or altered granites (Toki, Inada), and artificial porous ceramics, were tested by gas-probe permeameters (steady-state gas flow and transient pressure-pulse). The gas leak evaluation is essential in such tests. Here we demonstrate that stabilized apparent permeability vs. applied load does not guarantee no-leak condition, but the gas leaks are effectively prevented by an applied epoxy-resin seal-ring around each planned test spot, including on rough and vuggy rocks. The steady-state gas flow and the transient pressure pulse-decay tests show very close agreement in permeability results, if the differential test pressures and gas flow rates are approximately the same. The permeabilities begin to differ if the pressures do not match resulting from non-Darcy gas flow effects that depend on the gas flow rate. The pressure-decay test is analyzed at small data segments to show the change of apparent permeability with differential pressure (from non-Darcy to Darcy regime). In tests on rocks of low permeability, the correction for environmental temperature variation is simple to implement. For rocks with permeability larger than about 10<sup>−17</sup> m<sup>2</sup>, the temperature variation does not affect the flow regime and no corrections need to be applied. Gas cooling due to depressurization did not significantly affect the transient pressure pulse-decay test results from later-time analysis of test data as low injection pressures are commonly used in pulse tests. However, impacts on early time data analysis need to be considered. The results of the absolute permeability from pressure-decay gas probe tests are matching published water-based permeameters within a half order of magnitude, which is within the uncertainty of these published data. On low-permeability granite, wider tests spots are better at testing the few dominant microfracture conduits than small spots. With appropriate probe-rock sealing methods and corrections, the probe-gas tip permeameter has been shown to correctly measure permeability in granite down to 10<sup>−20</sup> m<sup>2</sup> absolute permeability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"351 ","pages":"Article 108023"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001379522500119X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The permeability of undeformed, deformed and/or altered granites (Toki, Inada), and artificial porous ceramics, were tested by gas-probe permeameters (steady-state gas flow and transient pressure-pulse). The gas leak evaluation is essential in such tests. Here we demonstrate that stabilized apparent permeability vs. applied load does not guarantee no-leak condition, but the gas leaks are effectively prevented by an applied epoxy-resin seal-ring around each planned test spot, including on rough and vuggy rocks. The steady-state gas flow and the transient pressure pulse-decay tests show very close agreement in permeability results, if the differential test pressures and gas flow rates are approximately the same. The permeabilities begin to differ if the pressures do not match resulting from non-Darcy gas flow effects that depend on the gas flow rate. The pressure-decay test is analyzed at small data segments to show the change of apparent permeability with differential pressure (from non-Darcy to Darcy regime). In tests on rocks of low permeability, the correction for environmental temperature variation is simple to implement. For rocks with permeability larger than about 10−17 m2, the temperature variation does not affect the flow regime and no corrections need to be applied. Gas cooling due to depressurization did not significantly affect the transient pressure pulse-decay test results from later-time analysis of test data as low injection pressures are commonly used in pulse tests. However, impacts on early time data analysis need to be considered. The results of the absolute permeability from pressure-decay gas probe tests are matching published water-based permeameters within a half order of magnitude, which is within the uncertainty of these published data. On low-permeability granite, wider tests spots are better at testing the few dominant microfracture conduits than small spots. With appropriate probe-rock sealing methods and corrections, the probe-gas tip permeameter has been shown to correctly measure permeability in granite down to 10−20 m2 absolute permeability.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Geology
Engineering Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
12.20%
发文量
327
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信