{"title":"Stability analysis of earth slopes with counterweight fill: Kinematic limit analysis","authors":"Dowon Park","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Counterweight fill, which involves adding mass to potentially unstable areas, such as the slope base or toe, is a common and effective technique for slope stabilization owing to its ease of installation and familiarity. As both a temporary and permanent preventive measure, both the design and analysis of counterweight fill require careful consideration to ensure a balanced distribution of the added weight. However, in practice, brief and empirical guidelines have been widely adopted, often without standardization. This study aimed to quantify the beneficial effects of counterweight fill on slope safety by analyzing the respective failure mechanisms. To achieve an optimal design, strategic fill configurations, including fill geometry, height, and area, are discussed. Further considerations include the strength and weight of counterweight fills, demonstrating the importance of fill positioning and material selection for slope stabilization. The addition of fill mass at the toe of the slopes could significantly strengthen the slope stability, potentially doubling the stability factors, assuming the fill used the same material as the slope. A strong dependence of the failure mechanisms of the fill-reinforced slopes was observed, leading to the potential local collapse of the restricted slope failure. The effectiveness of counterweight fills is affected by fill configuration and material properties, highlighting the importance of quantitative analysis and design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"351 ","pages":"Article 108027"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795225001231","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Counterweight fill, which involves adding mass to potentially unstable areas, such as the slope base or toe, is a common and effective technique for slope stabilization owing to its ease of installation and familiarity. As both a temporary and permanent preventive measure, both the design and analysis of counterweight fill require careful consideration to ensure a balanced distribution of the added weight. However, in practice, brief and empirical guidelines have been widely adopted, often without standardization. This study aimed to quantify the beneficial effects of counterweight fill on slope safety by analyzing the respective failure mechanisms. To achieve an optimal design, strategic fill configurations, including fill geometry, height, and area, are discussed. Further considerations include the strength and weight of counterweight fills, demonstrating the importance of fill positioning and material selection for slope stabilization. The addition of fill mass at the toe of the slopes could significantly strengthen the slope stability, potentially doubling the stability factors, assuming the fill used the same material as the slope. A strong dependence of the failure mechanisms of the fill-reinforced slopes was observed, leading to the potential local collapse of the restricted slope failure. The effectiveness of counterweight fills is affected by fill configuration and material properties, highlighting the importance of quantitative analysis and design.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.