Occupational incidence of bladder cancer amongst veteran ammunition technicians of the British Army

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Gareth Collett, Tim Bashford, Nik J. Whitehead, Ewa Kazimierska, Gokul Vignesh Kanda Swamy, Robert J. Jones, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Richard T. Bryan
{"title":"Occupational incidence of bladder cancer amongst veteran ammunition technicians of the British Army","authors":"Gareth Collett,&nbsp;Tim Bashford,&nbsp;Nik J. Whitehead,&nbsp;Ewa Kazimierska,&nbsp;Gokul Vignesh Kanda Swamy,&nbsp;Robert J. Jones,&nbsp;Mieke Van Hemelrijck,&nbsp;Richard T. Bryan","doi":"10.1111/bju.16678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bladder cancer is a common malignancy of the urinary tract [<span>1</span>], with occupational exposure the second most common modifiable risk factor after smoking [<span>2</span>]. Individuals involved in bomb disposal may be at risk of bladder cancer as explosive compounds such as nitro-aromatics can be derivatives of benzene or amines [<span>3, 4</span>]. Such individuals include ammunition technicians (AT) within the British Army (the mainstay of high-threat bomb disposal in the UK), where the risk of bladder cancer remains unknown and the association between exposure to explosives and bladder cancer is undetermined.</p><p>As a profession, AT personnel are exposed to potential carcinogens found in bulk explosives, their precursors, their detonation and degradation products, and the residue from the combustion of pyrotechnic compositions, ammunition, and associated packaging [<span>5</span>]. Pathways to exposure include inhalation, absorption, and ingestion. Hence, we sought to investigate the association between exposure to explosives and bladder cancer risk within the AT profession.</p><p>With ethical approval (University of Wales Trinity Saint David ethics reference EC1273 PG2), we used a questionnaire to survey the veteran AT network given security implications associated with the participation of serving individuals. The questionnaire (which can be made available upon request) was based upon up-to-date epidemiological evidence of risk factors [<span>2</span>] and sought to elucidate cancer occurrences. Veteran ATs with known contact details were approached on social media by the <i>Felix Fund Bomb Disposal Charity</i> between 1 March and 31 May 2024. The veteran cohort comprised 688 AT who had served within one particular Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) squadron since 1970, representing 30% of the 2300 soldiers known to have trained and served to date (the largest possible sample size available). In this EOD squadron, AT personnel would have been exposed to all modalities of ammunition management prior to appointment, which includes manufacture, storage, inspection, maintenance, and disposal.</p><p>Given the vast array of explosives managed by the ATs, it was necessary to limit the scope of the survey. As such, nitro and nitramine explosives were highlighted as representative groups given that they are the most common explosives encountered within the global ordnance, munitions and explosives stockpile [<span>6</span>]—all serving and veteran ATs are exposed to them.</p><p>Responses to the survey were extracted and tabulated using descriptive statistics (Table 1). Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% CIs for bladder cancer were then calculated by comparing the incidence in the AT cohort with the UK general population [<span>7</span>].</p><p>We received 203 responses to the survey (30% of those 688 veterans approached). Of all cancers diagnosed within respondents, bladder cancer accounted for 27% (prostate, 22%; testicular, 4%; colon/bowel, 13%; throat, 4%; ureteric, 2%; myelodysplastic syndrome, 2%; and skin, 24%). In respondents with a bladder cancer diagnosis, a higher proportion reported weekly exposure to nitro-aromatic explosives during their career (67%) than in other cancer (24%) and no cancer respondents (16%); a similar relationship was observed for weekly exposure during EOD tasks (42%, 21% and 28%, respectively).</p><p>Using the whole cohort of 688 to compare bladder cancer incidence with the UK general population, SIRs showed increased occurrence of bladder cancer amongst AT (SIRs for age 50–59 years: 7.27, 95% CI 2.33–22.55; age 60–69 years: 3.42, 95% CI 1.30–9.10). Three-quarters of bladder cancers were diagnosed below the age of 70 years, representing an SIR of 5.03 (95% CI 2.62–9.67) vs the UK general population below the age of 70 years [<span>7</span>]. Pathological details were known for 10/12 respondents with bladder cancer —all these tumours were high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC; five) or muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC; five).</p><p>This is the first UK study to quantify the association between exposure to certain groups of explosives and bladder cancer (BC). SIRs indicate an excess of BC occurrence, representing 27% of cancer diagnoses in ATs, a considerable excess compared to the UK general population [<span>7</span>]. Smoking is another contributor to BC risk, and BC cases from this study were either ex-smokers (50%) or non-smokers (50%) compared with other cancer cases (3% smokers, 61% ex-smokers, 36% non-smokers) and the no cancer group (2% smokers, 54% ex-smokers, 44% non-smokers). Hence, smoking does not appear to be the principal cause of the BC excess amongst this group. In addition, two younger diagnoses (age &lt;40 years) may be linked to schistosomiasis (one veteran) or other causes (one, length of service &lt;5 years). Male preponderance was expected given that females did not join the AT profession until 2001.</p><p>This small dataset does not permit robust multivariate analyses of risk factors and is indicative. Future studies should collect detailed information on a larger number of participants, as well as potential confounders, to provide more precise CIs. However, the difference in BC risk between AT respondents and the UK general population appears to be profound. If we were to assume that the remainder of the 2300 veteran/non-veteran AT who have served in the squadron were within the no cancer group, our findings still demonstrate an excess of BC (SIRs for age 50–59 years: 2.17, 95% CI 1.17–4.05; age 60–69 years: 1.02, 95% CI 0.28–3.68). However, we are unable to account for attrition due to death in service, from cancer, or other diseases within that cohort.</p><p>When assessing the types of explosive exposures, weekly exposure to nitro-explosives during disposal was 2.8-times more frequent for those diagnosed with BC compared to those diagnosed with other cancers. This suggests that exposure to ammunition at end of useful service life, degraded/unsafe ammunition, or the products of detonation (gaseous, particulate, or within the soil medium of demolition areas [<span>8</span>]) is indicative of increased risk. These procedures align with activities subjectively characterised as higher risk by AT military heads of service, as many nitro-explosive precursors and their metabolites are closely related to known bladder carcinogens (e.g., aromatic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons). Notably, ATs also deal with homemade explosives, synthesised from a variety of harmful chemical precursors, as well as military or commercial explosives.</p><p>This survey presents the first quantitative data for a small but vital profession to the UK's national security and highlights an urgent need for further investigations into military exposure to explosives and the risk of BC. Regular exposure to nitro-explosives is associated with high incidence rates, especially for those AT between the ages of 50 and 69 years, with a median length of 25 years from first exposure to BC diagnosis. Therefore, safe exposure levels should be established by duty holders to inform the protection and post-exposure monitoring of all military personnel. Although the AT profession is inherently dangerous, the longer-term risks for veterans worldwide should not be ignored. Since completion of this initial survey, two further AT veterans have been diagnosed with BC, taking the number of known cases amongst 688 individuals to 14.</p><p>Gareth Collett is an unpaid charity trustee for the Felix Fund Bomb Disposal Charity and former head of the UK Bomb Disposal Profession. Richard T. Bryan receives research funding from Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Wellcome Trust (UK) and Janssen (European Union), is a paid consultant for Informed Genomics Limited (UK) and Cystotech (Denmark) and is an unpaid charity trustee for Action Bladder Cancer UK (UK). Mieke Van Hemelrijck receives funding from CRUK, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC, Belgium), Bayer (Germany), National Institute for Health Research (UK), Medical Research Council (UK), Guy's Cancer Charity (UK), Royal Marsden Cancer Charity (UK), and Movember Foundation (Australia). She is an unpaid member of the Board of the EORTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"135 6","pages":"928-930"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bju.16678","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.16678","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bladder cancer is a common malignancy of the urinary tract [1], with occupational exposure the second most common modifiable risk factor after smoking [2]. Individuals involved in bomb disposal may be at risk of bladder cancer as explosive compounds such as nitro-aromatics can be derivatives of benzene or amines [3, 4]. Such individuals include ammunition technicians (AT) within the British Army (the mainstay of high-threat bomb disposal in the UK), where the risk of bladder cancer remains unknown and the association between exposure to explosives and bladder cancer is undetermined.

As a profession, AT personnel are exposed to potential carcinogens found in bulk explosives, their precursors, their detonation and degradation products, and the residue from the combustion of pyrotechnic compositions, ammunition, and associated packaging [5]. Pathways to exposure include inhalation, absorption, and ingestion. Hence, we sought to investigate the association between exposure to explosives and bladder cancer risk within the AT profession.

With ethical approval (University of Wales Trinity Saint David ethics reference EC1273 PG2), we used a questionnaire to survey the veteran AT network given security implications associated with the participation of serving individuals. The questionnaire (which can be made available upon request) was based upon up-to-date epidemiological evidence of risk factors [2] and sought to elucidate cancer occurrences. Veteran ATs with known contact details were approached on social media by the Felix Fund Bomb Disposal Charity between 1 March and 31 May 2024. The veteran cohort comprised 688 AT who had served within one particular Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) squadron since 1970, representing 30% of the 2300 soldiers known to have trained and served to date (the largest possible sample size available). In this EOD squadron, AT personnel would have been exposed to all modalities of ammunition management prior to appointment, which includes manufacture, storage, inspection, maintenance, and disposal.

Given the vast array of explosives managed by the ATs, it was necessary to limit the scope of the survey. As such, nitro and nitramine explosives were highlighted as representative groups given that they are the most common explosives encountered within the global ordnance, munitions and explosives stockpile [6]—all serving and veteran ATs are exposed to them.

Responses to the survey were extracted and tabulated using descriptive statistics (Table 1). Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% CIs for bladder cancer were then calculated by comparing the incidence in the AT cohort with the UK general population [7].

We received 203 responses to the survey (30% of those 688 veterans approached). Of all cancers diagnosed within respondents, bladder cancer accounted for 27% (prostate, 22%; testicular, 4%; colon/bowel, 13%; throat, 4%; ureteric, 2%; myelodysplastic syndrome, 2%; and skin, 24%). In respondents with a bladder cancer diagnosis, a higher proportion reported weekly exposure to nitro-aromatic explosives during their career (67%) than in other cancer (24%) and no cancer respondents (16%); a similar relationship was observed for weekly exposure during EOD tasks (42%, 21% and 28%, respectively).

Using the whole cohort of 688 to compare bladder cancer incidence with the UK general population, SIRs showed increased occurrence of bladder cancer amongst AT (SIRs for age 50–59 years: 7.27, 95% CI 2.33–22.55; age 60–69 years: 3.42, 95% CI 1.30–9.10). Three-quarters of bladder cancers were diagnosed below the age of 70 years, representing an SIR of 5.03 (95% CI 2.62–9.67) vs the UK general population below the age of 70 years [7]. Pathological details were known for 10/12 respondents with bladder cancer —all these tumours were high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC; five) or muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC; five).

This is the first UK study to quantify the association between exposure to certain groups of explosives and bladder cancer (BC). SIRs indicate an excess of BC occurrence, representing 27% of cancer diagnoses in ATs, a considerable excess compared to the UK general population [7]. Smoking is another contributor to BC risk, and BC cases from this study were either ex-smokers (50%) or non-smokers (50%) compared with other cancer cases (3% smokers, 61% ex-smokers, 36% non-smokers) and the no cancer group (2% smokers, 54% ex-smokers, 44% non-smokers). Hence, smoking does not appear to be the principal cause of the BC excess amongst this group. In addition, two younger diagnoses (age <40 years) may be linked to schistosomiasis (one veteran) or other causes (one, length of service <5 years). Male preponderance was expected given that females did not join the AT profession until 2001.

This small dataset does not permit robust multivariate analyses of risk factors and is indicative. Future studies should collect detailed information on a larger number of participants, as well as potential confounders, to provide more precise CIs. However, the difference in BC risk between AT respondents and the UK general population appears to be profound. If we were to assume that the remainder of the 2300 veteran/non-veteran AT who have served in the squadron were within the no cancer group, our findings still demonstrate an excess of BC (SIRs for age 50–59 years: 2.17, 95% CI 1.17–4.05; age 60–69 years: 1.02, 95% CI 0.28–3.68). However, we are unable to account for attrition due to death in service, from cancer, or other diseases within that cohort.

When assessing the types of explosive exposures, weekly exposure to nitro-explosives during disposal was 2.8-times more frequent for those diagnosed with BC compared to those diagnosed with other cancers. This suggests that exposure to ammunition at end of useful service life, degraded/unsafe ammunition, or the products of detonation (gaseous, particulate, or within the soil medium of demolition areas [8]) is indicative of increased risk. These procedures align with activities subjectively characterised as higher risk by AT military heads of service, as many nitro-explosive precursors and their metabolites are closely related to known bladder carcinogens (e.g., aromatic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons). Notably, ATs also deal with homemade explosives, synthesised from a variety of harmful chemical precursors, as well as military or commercial explosives.

This survey presents the first quantitative data for a small but vital profession to the UK's national security and highlights an urgent need for further investigations into military exposure to explosives and the risk of BC. Regular exposure to nitro-explosives is associated with high incidence rates, especially for those AT between the ages of 50 and 69 years, with a median length of 25 years from first exposure to BC diagnosis. Therefore, safe exposure levels should be established by duty holders to inform the protection and post-exposure monitoring of all military personnel. Although the AT profession is inherently dangerous, the longer-term risks for veterans worldwide should not be ignored. Since completion of this initial survey, two further AT veterans have been diagnosed with BC, taking the number of known cases amongst 688 individuals to 14.

Gareth Collett is an unpaid charity trustee for the Felix Fund Bomb Disposal Charity and former head of the UK Bomb Disposal Profession. Richard T. Bryan receives research funding from Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Wellcome Trust (UK) and Janssen (European Union), is a paid consultant for Informed Genomics Limited (UK) and Cystotech (Denmark) and is an unpaid charity trustee for Action Bladder Cancer UK (UK). Mieke Van Hemelrijck receives funding from CRUK, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC, Belgium), Bayer (Germany), National Institute for Health Research (UK), Medical Research Council (UK), Guy's Cancer Charity (UK), Royal Marsden Cancer Charity (UK), and Movember Foundation (Australia). She is an unpaid member of the Board of the EORTC.

英国陆军资深弹药技术人员膀胱癌的职业发病率
膀胱癌是一种常见的泌尿道恶性肿瘤,职业暴露是仅次于吸烟的第二大可改变的危险因素。参与拆弹的个人可能面临膀胱癌的风险,因为硝基芳烃等爆炸性化合物可能是苯或胺的衍生物[3,4]。这些人包括英国陆军(英国高威胁炸弹处理的支柱)中的弹药技术人员(AT),他们患膀胱癌的风险尚不清楚,暴露于爆炸物和膀胱癌之间的关系尚不确定。作为一种职业,空投人员暴露于散装炸药、其前体、其引爆和降解产物以及烟火成分、弹药和相关包装物燃烧残留物中发现的潜在致癌物0。接触途径包括吸入、吸收和摄入。因此,我们试图调查爆炸物暴露与膀胱癌风险之间的关系。经伦理批准(威尔士三一圣大卫大学伦理参考EC1273 PG2),我们使用问卷调查老兵AT网络,考虑到与服役人员参与相关的安全影响。调查表(可应要求提供)是根据最新的流行病学证据编制的危险因素bbb,目的是阐明癌症的发生情况。2024年3月1日至5月31日期间,费利克斯基金拆弹慈善机构在社交媒体上联系了已知联系方式的退伍军人。老兵队伍包括688名自1970年以来在一个特定的爆炸物处理(EOD)中队服役的AT,占迄今为止已知训练和服役的2300名士兵的30%(最大可能的样本量)。在这个EOD中队,AT人员在被任命之前将接触到弹药管理的所有模式,包括制造、储存、检查、维护和处置。鉴于ATs管理的爆炸物种类繁多,有必要限制调查的范围。因此,硝基和硝胺炸药被强调为具有代表性的类别,因为它们是全球军械、弹药和爆炸物储备中最常见的爆炸物-所有现役和退伍的陆战队员都接触到它们。对调查的反馈进行提取,并使用描述性统计(表1)制成表格。通过比较AT队列与英国普通人群的发病率,计算膀胱癌的标准化发病率(SIRs)和95% CIs。我们收到了203份调查回复(688名退伍军人中的30%)。在受访者中诊断出的所有癌症中,膀胱癌占27%(前列腺癌,22%;睾丸,4%;结肠/肠,13%;喉咙,4%;输尿管的,2%;骨髓增生异常综合征,2%;皮肤,24%)。在膀胱癌诊断的应答者中,报告在其职业生涯中每周接触硝基芳香炸药的比例(67%)高于其他癌症应答者(24%)和无癌症应答者(16%);在EOD任务期间,每周暴露的情况也有类似的关系(分别为42%、21%和28%)。使用688人的整个队列来比较膀胱癌发病率与英国普通人群,SIRs显示,50-59岁的SIRs中膀胱癌发病率增加(SIRs: 7.27, 95% CI 2.33-22.55;年龄60-69岁:3.42,95% CI 1.30-9.10)。四分之三的膀胱癌是在70岁以下被诊断出来的,与70岁以下的英国普通人群相比,SIR为5.03 (95% CI 2.62-9.67)。10/12名膀胱癌患者的病理细节是已知的——所有这些肿瘤都是高级别非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC;5例)或肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC);5)。这是英国首个量化暴露于某些爆炸物与膀胱癌(BC)之间关系的研究。SIRs表明BC的发生率过高,占ATs中癌症诊断的27%,与英国普通人群相比,这一比例相当高。吸烟是BC风险的另一个因素,本研究中的BC病例要么是戒烟者(50%),要么是非吸烟者(50%),而其他癌症病例(吸烟者3%,戒烟者61%,非吸烟者36%)和非癌症组(吸烟者2%,戒烟者54%,非吸烟者44%)。因此,吸烟似乎不是这一群体中BC过量的主要原因。此外,两例较年轻的诊断(年龄40岁)可能与血吸虫病(一名退伍军人)或其他原因(一名,服役年限5年)有关。考虑到女性直到2001年才加入AT职业,男性占多数是意料之中的。这个小数据集不允许对危险因素进行稳健的多变量分析,具有指示性。 未来的研究应该收集更多参与者的详细信息,以及潜在的混杂因素,以提供更精确的ci。然而,AT应答者和英国普通人群之间的BC风险差异似乎是深远的。如果我们假设在中队服役的2300名退伍军人/非退伍军人AT中其余的人属于无癌症组,我们的研究结果仍然表明50-59岁的BC (sir)过量:2.17,95% CI 1.17-4.05;年龄60-69岁:1.02,95% CI 0.28-3.68)。然而,我们无法解释该队列中因在职死亡、癌症或其他疾病造成的人员流失。在评估爆炸暴露类型时,在处置过程中,被诊断患有BC的人每周暴露于硝基炸药的频率是被诊断患有其他癌症的人的2.8倍。这表明,在使用寿命结束时接触弹药、退化/不安全弹药或爆炸产物(气体、颗粒或在爆破区[8]的土壤介质内)表明风险增加。由于许多硝基炸药前体及其代谢物与已知的膀胱癌物质(如芳香胺和多环芳香烃)密切相关,这些程序与被澳航军事服务负责人主观定性为高风险的活动相一致。值得注意的是,ATs还处理由各种有害化学前体合成的自制爆炸物,以及军用或商用爆炸物。这项调查首次提供了对英国国家安全至关重要的一个小行业的定量数据,并强调了对军队暴露于爆炸物和BC风险进行进一步调查的迫切需要。经常接触硝基炸药与高发病率有关,特别是50至69岁之间的AT患者,从首次接触到BC诊断的中位时间为25年。因此,职责人员应确定安全接触水平,以便为所有军事人员的保护和接触后监测提供信息。尽管AT这个职业本身就很危险,但对全世界退伍军人来说,长期的风险不应被忽视。自这项初步调查完成以来,又有两名AT退伍军人被诊断患有BC,使688人中已知病例的数量达到14例。Gareth Collett是Felix基金拆弹慈善机构的无薪慈善受托人,也是英国拆弹专业的前负责人。Richard T. Bryan接受英国癌症研究中心(CRUK),惠康信托(英国)和杨森(欧盟)的研究资助,是Informed Genomics Limited(英国)和Cystotech(丹麦)的有偿顾问,是Action膀胱癌英国(英国)的无偿慈善受托人。Mieke Van Hemelrijck接受CRUK、欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织(比利时)、拜耳(德国)、英国国家卫生研究所、医学研究委员会(英国)、Guy癌症慈善机构(英国)、皇家马斯登癌症慈善机构(英国)和胡子月基金会(澳大利亚)的资助。她是EORTC董事会的无薪成员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信