"Kinlessness," Social Connectedness, and Subjective Well-Being in Europe.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Marco Tosi, Thijs Van den Broek
{"title":"\"Kinlessness,\" Social Connectedness, and Subjective Well-Being in Europe.","authors":"Marco Tosi, Thijs Van den Broek","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbaf055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examines the association between family structure and subjective well-being by focusing on the moderating effects of social connectedness across genders and country contexts. We compare the well-being of older adults across 4 family types: those with both a partner and children, those with a partner but not children, those with children but no partner, and those without a partner and children (\"kinless\").</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use data from 6 waves of the European Social Survey (2012-2024) and estimate ordered logistic regression models of happiness and life satisfaction among middle-aged and older Europeans aged 50-104 (62,687 men and 73,323 women). We include interactions in the analysis to test whether social connectedness mitigates the well-being differences between kinless adults and partnered parents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show that middle-aged and older adults, especially men, without a partner exhibit lower levels of happiness and life satisfaction compared with their partnered counterparts, regardless of the absence of children. The subjective well-being gap between partnered and unpartnered men diminishes according to their level of social connectedness, a moderating effect primarily observed in Nordic and Western European countries.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Contrary to the notion that \"kinlessness\" leads to aging alone, middle-aged and older men in less family-centered countries are able to alleviate the detrimental impact of partnerlessness on subjective well-being through increased social connectedness. In contrast, in countries where family ties are more emphasized, particularly in Eastern Europe, un-partnered adults face greater well-being challenges that are harder to offset with social connectedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":56111,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study examines the association between family structure and subjective well-being by focusing on the moderating effects of social connectedness across genders and country contexts. We compare the well-being of older adults across 4 family types: those with both a partner and children, those with a partner but not children, those with children but no partner, and those without a partner and children ("kinless").

Methods: We use data from 6 waves of the European Social Survey (2012-2024) and estimate ordered logistic regression models of happiness and life satisfaction among middle-aged and older Europeans aged 50-104 (62,687 men and 73,323 women). We include interactions in the analysis to test whether social connectedness mitigates the well-being differences between kinless adults and partnered parents.

Results: The results show that middle-aged and older adults, especially men, without a partner exhibit lower levels of happiness and life satisfaction compared with their partnered counterparts, regardless of the absence of children. The subjective well-being gap between partnered and unpartnered men diminishes according to their level of social connectedness, a moderating effect primarily observed in Nordic and Western European countries.

Discussion: Contrary to the notion that "kinlessness" leads to aging alone, middle-aged and older men in less family-centered countries are able to alleviate the detrimental impact of partnerlessness on subjective well-being through increased social connectedness. In contrast, in countries where family ties are more emphasized, particularly in Eastern Europe, un-partnered adults face greater well-being challenges that are harder to offset with social connectedness.

欧洲的“无亲属性”、社会联系和主观幸福感。
目的:本研究通过关注社会连通性在性别和国家背景下的调节作用,探讨了家庭结构与主观幸福感之间的关系。我们比较了四种家庭类型中老年人的幸福感:有伴侣和孩子的家庭,有伴侣但没有孩子的家庭,有孩子但没有伴侣的家庭,以及没有伴侣和孩子的家庭(“无亲属”)。方法:我们使用了欧洲社会调查(2012-2024)的六波数据,并估计了50-104岁欧洲中老年(62,687名男性和73,323名女性)的幸福感和生活满意度的有序逻辑回归模型。我们将相互作用纳入分析,以测试社会联系是否会减轻无亲属成年人和有伴侣父母之间的幸福感差异。结果:研究结果显示,与有伴侣的人相比,没有伴侣的中老年人,尤其是男性,无论是否有孩子,他们的幸福感和生活满意度都较低。有伴侣和没有伴侣的男性之间的主观幸福感差距根据他们的社会联系水平而缩小,这种调节效应主要在北欧和西欧国家观察到。讨论:与“无亲属关系”导致孤独衰老的观念相反,在不那么以家庭为中心的国家,中年和老年男性能够通过增加社会联系来减轻无伴侣对主观幸福感的有害影响。相比之下,在更强调家庭关系的国家,特别是在东欧,没有伴侣的成年人面临着更大的福祉挑战,而这些挑战很难用社会联系来抵消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences publishes articles on development in adulthood and old age that advance the psychological science of aging processes and outcomes. Articles have clear implications for theoretical or methodological innovation in the psychology of aging or contribute significantly to the empirical understanding of psychological processes and aging. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, attitudes, clinical applications, cognition, education, emotion, health, human factors, interpersonal relations, neuropsychology, perception, personality, physiological psychology, social psychology, and sensation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信