Sarah J. Blau , Alison Tovar , Deborah N. Pearlman , Heidi M. Weeks , Jeneen Ali , Katherine W. Bauer
{"title":"“It makes you feel worthless.” The lived experience of discrimination in the US food assistance system","authors":"Sarah J. Blau , Alison Tovar , Deborah N. Pearlman , Heidi M. Weeks , Jeneen Ali , Katherine W. Bauer","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examined the lived experience of judgment, mistreatment, and fear related to federal food assistance programs and the emergency food system among families experiencing food insecurity with specific attention to the intersections of holding multiple stigmatized identities while engaging with food assistance. Between November 2022 and June 2023, Feeding MI Families enrolled 781 English and Spanish-speaking parents experiencing food insecurity from 3 Michigan cities. Participants completed closed- and open-ended survey questions assessing their experiences of judgment, mistreatment, and fear related to using food assistance. Quantitative methods were used to identify similarities in these experiences across food assistance program use and sociodemographic characteristics, and qualitative methods were used to identify themes in participants' descriptions of their experiences. Approximately one-third of participants reported experiencing judgment due to using food assistance (38.4 %) or having worried about mistreatment by food assistance programs (37.5 %). Over half (54.8 %) of those born outside the US feared that using assistance would affect their immigration status. Participants described structural issues in the administration of food assistance programs as discriminatory. Often, these experiences were entwined with participants' gender, race, ethnicity, and language fluency. Participants also frequently spoke of interpersonal discrimination due to their use of food assistance, including being stereotyped as lazy, unemployed, and abusing the system. These experiences often occurred while grocery shopping, when one's use of food assistance can be on display. Social and structural interventions that combat stereotypes of food insecurity and improve the efficiency and dignity of food assistance systems could increase program utilization and impacts, particularly within communities that hold other stigmatized identities, decreasing the physical, emotional, and cognitive burden of food insecurity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"372 ","pages":"Article 117959"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625002898","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examined the lived experience of judgment, mistreatment, and fear related to federal food assistance programs and the emergency food system among families experiencing food insecurity with specific attention to the intersections of holding multiple stigmatized identities while engaging with food assistance. Between November 2022 and June 2023, Feeding MI Families enrolled 781 English and Spanish-speaking parents experiencing food insecurity from 3 Michigan cities. Participants completed closed- and open-ended survey questions assessing their experiences of judgment, mistreatment, and fear related to using food assistance. Quantitative methods were used to identify similarities in these experiences across food assistance program use and sociodemographic characteristics, and qualitative methods were used to identify themes in participants' descriptions of their experiences. Approximately one-third of participants reported experiencing judgment due to using food assistance (38.4 %) or having worried about mistreatment by food assistance programs (37.5 %). Over half (54.8 %) of those born outside the US feared that using assistance would affect their immigration status. Participants described structural issues in the administration of food assistance programs as discriminatory. Often, these experiences were entwined with participants' gender, race, ethnicity, and language fluency. Participants also frequently spoke of interpersonal discrimination due to their use of food assistance, including being stereotyped as lazy, unemployed, and abusing the system. These experiences often occurred while grocery shopping, when one's use of food assistance can be on display. Social and structural interventions that combat stereotypes of food insecurity and improve the efficiency and dignity of food assistance systems could increase program utilization and impacts, particularly within communities that hold other stigmatized identities, decreasing the physical, emotional, and cognitive burden of food insecurity.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.