User Experience of a Bespoke Videoconferencing System for Web-Based Family Visitation for Patients in an Intensive Care Unit: 1-Year Cross-Sectional Survey of Nursing Staff.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.2196/54560
Aoife Murray, Irial Conroy, Frank Kirrane, Leonie Cullen, Hemendra Worlikar, Derek T O'Keeffe
{"title":"User Experience of a Bespoke Videoconferencing System for Web-Based Family Visitation for Patients in an Intensive Care Unit: 1-Year Cross-Sectional Survey of Nursing Staff.","authors":"Aoife Murray, Irial Conroy, Frank Kirrane, Leonie Cullen, Hemendra Worlikar, Derek T O'Keeffe","doi":"10.2196/54560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, in-person visitation within hospitals was restricted and sometimes eliminated to reduce the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Many health care professionals created novel strategies that were deployed to maintain a patient-centered approach. Although pandemic-related restrictions have eased, these systems, including videoconferencing or web-based bedside visits, remain relevant for visitors who cannot be present due to other reasons (lack of access to transport, socioeconomic restraints, geographical distance, etc).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this study were (1) to report the experience of intensive care nursing staff using a bespoke videoconferencing system called ICU FamilyLink; (2) to examine the scenarios in which the nursing staff used the system; and (3) to assess the future use of videoconferencing systems to enhance communication with families.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Telehealth Usability questionnaire was administered to the nursing staff (N=22) of an intensive care unit in a model 4 tertiary hospital in Ireland 1 year after implementing the bespoke videoconferencing system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 22 nurses working in the intensive care department at University Hospital Galway, Ireland, responded to the survey. A total of 23% (n=5) of participants were between the ages of 25 and 34 years, 54% (n=12) were between 35 and 44 years, and 23% (n=5) were between 45 and 54 years. Most (n=15, 68%) of the participants reported never using videoconferencing in the intensive care setting to communicate with family members before March 2020. The modified Telehealth Usability Questionnaire showed overall satisfaction scores for each subcategory of ease of use and learnability, interface quality, interaction quality, reliability, satisfaction and future use, and usefulness. In total, 21 (95%) participants agreed or strongly agreed with the statement, \"I would use the ICU FamilyLink system in future circumstances in which family members cannot be physically present (ie, pandemics, abroad, inability to travel, etc),\" and 1 participant responded neutrally. One participant highlighted a common scenario in intensive care settings in which a videoconferencing system can be used \"Even without COVID, web-based communication is important when patients become unexpectedly ill and when families are abroad.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides valuable insights into health care professionals' experience using a videoconferencing system to facilitate web-based visits for families. We conclude that videoconferencing systems when appropriately tailored to the environment with the users in mind can be an acceptable solution to maintain communication with family members who cannot be physically present at the bedside. The bespoke videoconferencing system had an overall positive response from 22 nursing staff who interacted with the system at varying frequency levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"12 ","pages":"e54560"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/54560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, in-person visitation within hospitals was restricted and sometimes eliminated to reduce the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Many health care professionals created novel strategies that were deployed to maintain a patient-centered approach. Although pandemic-related restrictions have eased, these systems, including videoconferencing or web-based bedside visits, remain relevant for visitors who cannot be present due to other reasons (lack of access to transport, socioeconomic restraints, geographical distance, etc).

Objective: The aims of this study were (1) to report the experience of intensive care nursing staff using a bespoke videoconferencing system called ICU FamilyLink; (2) to examine the scenarios in which the nursing staff used the system; and (3) to assess the future use of videoconferencing systems to enhance communication with families.

Methods: A modified Telehealth Usability questionnaire was administered to the nursing staff (N=22) of an intensive care unit in a model 4 tertiary hospital in Ireland 1 year after implementing the bespoke videoconferencing system.

Results: In total, 22 nurses working in the intensive care department at University Hospital Galway, Ireland, responded to the survey. A total of 23% (n=5) of participants were between the ages of 25 and 34 years, 54% (n=12) were between 35 and 44 years, and 23% (n=5) were between 45 and 54 years. Most (n=15, 68%) of the participants reported never using videoconferencing in the intensive care setting to communicate with family members before March 2020. The modified Telehealth Usability Questionnaire showed overall satisfaction scores for each subcategory of ease of use and learnability, interface quality, interaction quality, reliability, satisfaction and future use, and usefulness. In total, 21 (95%) participants agreed or strongly agreed with the statement, "I would use the ICU FamilyLink system in future circumstances in which family members cannot be physically present (ie, pandemics, abroad, inability to travel, etc)," and 1 participant responded neutrally. One participant highlighted a common scenario in intensive care settings in which a videoconferencing system can be used "Even without COVID, web-based communication is important when patients become unexpectedly ill and when families are abroad."

Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into health care professionals' experience using a videoconferencing system to facilitate web-based visits for families. We conclude that videoconferencing systems when appropriately tailored to the environment with the users in mind can be an acceptable solution to maintain communication with family members who cannot be physically present at the bedside. The bespoke videoconferencing system had an overall positive response from 22 nursing staff who interacted with the system at varying frequency levels.

背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,为了降低 SARS-CoV-2 的传播风险,医院内的探视受到限制,有时甚至被取消。许多医疗保健专业人员创造了新颖的策略,以保持以病人为中心的方法。虽然与大流行相关的限制有所放松,但这些系统(包括视频会议或网络床旁探视)对于因其他原因(缺乏交通工具、社会经济限制、地理距离等)而无法到场的探视者仍有意义:本研究的目的是:(1) 报告重症监护护理人员使用定制的 ICU FamilyLink 视频会议系统的经验;(2) 研究护理人员使用该系统的情景;(3) 评估未来使用视频会议系统加强与家属沟通的情况:方法:对爱尔兰一家 4 型三甲医院重症监护病房的护理人员(22 人)在实施定制视频会议系统 1 年后进行了经修改的远程保健可用性问卷调查:共有 22 名在爱尔兰戈尔韦大学医院重症监护室工作的护士参与了调查。23%的参与者(5 人)年龄在 25 至 34 岁之间,54% 的参与者(12 人)年龄在 35 至 44 岁之间,23% 的参与者(5 人)年龄在 45 至 54 岁之间。大多数参与者(15 人,68%)表示在 2020 年 3 月之前从未在重症监护环境中使用过视频会议与家人沟通。修改后的远程保健可用性问卷显示了易用性和可学习性、界面质量、交互质量、可靠性、满意度和未来使用以及有用性等每个子类别的总体满意度得分。共有 21 位参与者(95%)同意或非常同意 "在未来家庭成员无法亲临现场的情况下(即大流行病、出国、无法旅行等),我会使用重症监护室家庭链接系统 "这一说法,1 位参与者持中立态度。一位与会者强调了在重症监护环境中可以使用视频会议系统的一种常见情况:"即使没有 COVID,当病人突发疾病或家属身在国外时,基于网络的沟通也非常重要:本研究为医护人员使用视频会议系统为家属进行网络探视提供了宝贵的经验。我们得出的结论是,视频会议系统如果能根据环境和用户情况进行适当调整,就可以成为与无法亲临床边的家属保持沟通的一种可接受的解决方案。定制的视频会议系统得到了 22 名护理人员的积极响应,他们与该系统的互动频率各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信