Mayur S. Patel , Arianna D. Carfora , Kathleen Botterbush , Dominic Franceschelli , Justin Zhang , Andrew Grossbach , Phillippe Mercier , Tobias A. Mattei
{"title":"Litigation Involving Delay of Spinal Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Reported Legal Cases in the United States","authors":"Mayur S. Patel , Arianna D. Carfora , Kathleen Botterbush , Dominic Franceschelli , Justin Zhang , Andrew Grossbach , Phillippe Mercier , Tobias A. Mattei","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, access to medical care was delayed worldwide. In multiple instances, the pandemic has led to delay in care, suboptimal patient outcomes and litigation. This study was designed to assess the incidence and characteristics of litigation in the United States related to delays in spine care secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of the legal database LexisNexis following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. LexisNexis was queried for cases, verdicts, and settlements involving a delay of spinal care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Collected data included plaintiffs' demographics and spinal pathology, delay length and reason, legal cause of action, state/region of occurrence, and case outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-two cases met the criteria for full review. The average reported delay in litigated cases was 5.64 ± 3.83 months, with 25% having not received the necessary spinal care at the time the claim was filed, most of which were in 2022. Most cases involved lumbosacral disease with pain as the predominant symptom (96.88%), followed by neurological deficits (25%). Most cases (62.50%) involved inmates and were based on a claim of cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the 8th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study provides granular detail about the characteristics of litigation related to delay of spinal care secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Most plaintiffs were inmates who had difficulty obtaining a specialist appointment, imaging, or treatment. In many cases the reason for litigation were unattended requests for simple and low-cost interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 123910"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875025002669","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, access to medical care was delayed worldwide. In multiple instances, the pandemic has led to delay in care, suboptimal patient outcomes and litigation. This study was designed to assess the incidence and characteristics of litigation in the United States related to delays in spine care secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
A retrospective review of the legal database LexisNexis following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. LexisNexis was queried for cases, verdicts, and settlements involving a delay of spinal care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Collected data included plaintiffs' demographics and spinal pathology, delay length and reason, legal cause of action, state/region of occurrence, and case outcome.
Results
Thirty-two cases met the criteria for full review. The average reported delay in litigated cases was 5.64 ± 3.83 months, with 25% having not received the necessary spinal care at the time the claim was filed, most of which were in 2022. Most cases involved lumbosacral disease with pain as the predominant symptom (96.88%), followed by neurological deficits (25%). Most cases (62.50%) involved inmates and were based on a claim of cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the 8th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Conclusions
This study provides granular detail about the characteristics of litigation related to delay of spinal care secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Most plaintiffs were inmates who had difficulty obtaining a specialist appointment, imaging, or treatment. In many cases the reason for litigation were unattended requests for simple and low-cost interventions.
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS