Comparison of unilateral and bilateral robot-assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty in treating Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ruoyu Yang, Zhiwei Huang, Shanzhong Shao, Jinrun Liu, Shuyang Xia, Wei Li, Yinshun Zhang, Jun Qian, Fulong Dong, Cailiang Shen, Hui Tao
{"title":"Comparison of unilateral and bilateral robot-assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty in treating Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.","authors":"Ruoyu Yang, Zhiwei Huang, Shanzhong Shao, Jinrun Liu, Shuyang Xia, Wei Li, Yinshun Zhang, Jun Qian, Fulong Dong, Cailiang Shen, Hui Tao","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and safety of unilateral and bilateral robot-assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty (RAPKP) in treating thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Our study retrospectively analyzed 78 patients (unilateral group: 48, bilateral group: 30) with OVCF treated with RAPKP from January 2020 to July 2022. The operation time, X-ray exposure time, bone cement volume, postoperative bone cement distribution, preoperative and postoperative pain visual Analogue Scale scores (VAS), Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI), Cobb angle, and vertebral height, bone cement leakage, Adjacent Vertebral Fracture (AVF) and Postoperative CT in both groups were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients were successfully treated with RAPKP and followed up for (19.90±5.38) months. Our results showed that the VAS core, ODI, vertebral height, and Cobb angle at postoperative follow-up were significantly improved in both groups compared to the preoperative period (P <0.05). The operation time in the bilateral group (46.20±6.89) minutes was not statistically different from the unilateral group (42.54±10.16) minutes (P >0.05), while the volume of bone cement injected was significantly more in the bilateral group (5.93±1.81) mL than in the unilateral group (4.73±0.51) mL (P <0.05). In addition, the distribution of bone cement in the bilateral group was significantly better than in the unilateral group (P <0.05). X-ray exposure dose were no significant differences in the two groups (P>0.05). Bone cement leaked 9 cases (18.75%) in the unilateral group and 6 cases (20.00%) in the bilateral group (P >0.05). No neurovascular injury or infection occurred. Adjacent Vertebral Fracture 8 cases (16.67%) in the unilateral group and 4 cases (13.33%) in the bilateral group (P >0.05). Postoperative CT ratios of adjacent vertebrae(Operated vertebra/Upper adjacent vertebra: unilateral:10.65±2.7. bilateral:11.32±3.1; Operated vertebra/Lower adjacent vertebra: unilateral:11.67±3.0. bilateral:12.48±2.9)(P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unilateral or bilateral RAPKP improves patients' VAS, ODI, sagittal index, and Cobb angle. Unilateral RAPKP possesses the advantage of fewer puncture injuries. Still, bilateral RAPKP has better postoperative cement distribution, and we believe that bilateral RAPKP has a better long-term prognosis, so we recommend bilateral RAPKP.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"123911"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123911","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of unilateral and bilateral robot-assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty (RAPKP) in treating thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF).

Methodology: Our study retrospectively analyzed 78 patients (unilateral group: 48, bilateral group: 30) with OVCF treated with RAPKP from January 2020 to July 2022. The operation time, X-ray exposure time, bone cement volume, postoperative bone cement distribution, preoperative and postoperative pain visual Analogue Scale scores (VAS), Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI), Cobb angle, and vertebral height, bone cement leakage, Adjacent Vertebral Fracture (AVF) and Postoperative CT in both groups were recorded.

Results: All patients were successfully treated with RAPKP and followed up for (19.90±5.38) months. Our results showed that the VAS core, ODI, vertebral height, and Cobb angle at postoperative follow-up were significantly improved in both groups compared to the preoperative period (P <0.05). The operation time in the bilateral group (46.20±6.89) minutes was not statistically different from the unilateral group (42.54±10.16) minutes (P >0.05), while the volume of bone cement injected was significantly more in the bilateral group (5.93±1.81) mL than in the unilateral group (4.73±0.51) mL (P <0.05). In addition, the distribution of bone cement in the bilateral group was significantly better than in the unilateral group (P <0.05). X-ray exposure dose were no significant differences in the two groups (P>0.05). Bone cement leaked 9 cases (18.75%) in the unilateral group and 6 cases (20.00%) in the bilateral group (P >0.05). No neurovascular injury or infection occurred. Adjacent Vertebral Fracture 8 cases (16.67%) in the unilateral group and 4 cases (13.33%) in the bilateral group (P >0.05). Postoperative CT ratios of adjacent vertebrae(Operated vertebra/Upper adjacent vertebra: unilateral:10.65±2.7. bilateral:11.32±3.1; Operated vertebra/Lower adjacent vertebra: unilateral:11.67±3.0. bilateral:12.48±2.9)(P>0.05).

Conclusions: Unilateral or bilateral RAPKP improves patients' VAS, ODI, sagittal index, and Cobb angle. Unilateral RAPKP possesses the advantage of fewer puncture injuries. Still, bilateral RAPKP has better postoperative cement distribution, and we believe that bilateral RAPKP has a better long-term prognosis, so we recommend bilateral RAPKP.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信