Educational Quality of YouTubeTM Videos on Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Ender Akdemir, Muhammet Çiçek, Battal Selçuk Çakmak, Mehmet Levent Akbulut, Muhammet Serdar Buğday
{"title":"Educational Quality of YouTube<sup>TM</sup> Videos on Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.","authors":"Ender Akdemir, Muhammet Çiçek, Battal Selçuk Çakmak, Mehmet Levent Akbulut, Muhammet Serdar Buğday","doi":"10.1089/lap.2025.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Prostate cancer is the most prevalent urogenital cancer among males. Radical prostatectomy remains the gold standard for localized prostate cancer treatment, with minimally invasive procedures (laparoscopic, robot-assisted laparoscopic) increasingly replacing open surgeries. YouTube™, a popular digital platform, hosts a substantial volume of prostate cancer-related videos, presenting a mix of accurate and misleading content. Given these challenges, researchers have proposed evaluation frameworks to assess the quality of YouTube™ videos. This study evaluates the educational adequacy and contextual relevance of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) videos on YouTube™ using established video evaluation criteria. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A search using the keyword \"Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy\" yielded 200 YouTube™ videos. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 131 videos were analyzed by three laparoscopic prostatectomy specialists. An evaluation was performed using scoring systems, including LAP-VEGaS, DISCERN, JAMA, GQS, and video power index (VPI). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 131 videos, 88 (67%) were from individual participants (Group 1), and 43 (33%) were from corporate channels (Group 2). Group 2 demonstrated significantly higher JAMA, GQS, and mDISCERN scores (<i>P</i> = .028, .005, and .001, respectively). The LAP-VEGaS score was also higher in Group 2 (7.09 ± 0.43) compared to Group 1 (5.08 ± 0.26; <i>P</i> < .001). VPI values were significantly greater in Group 2 (<i>P</i> = .008). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study highlights a critical gap in the educational quality of LRP videos on YouTube™. Using comprehensive scoring systems, corporate channels consistently provided higher-quality educational content compared to individual contributors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"373-378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate cancer is the most prevalent urogenital cancer among males. Radical prostatectomy remains the gold standard for localized prostate cancer treatment, with minimally invasive procedures (laparoscopic, robot-assisted laparoscopic) increasingly replacing open surgeries. YouTube™, a popular digital platform, hosts a substantial volume of prostate cancer-related videos, presenting a mix of accurate and misleading content. Given these challenges, researchers have proposed evaluation frameworks to assess the quality of YouTube™ videos. This study evaluates the educational adequacy and contextual relevance of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) videos on YouTube™ using established video evaluation criteria. Methods: A search using the keyword "Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy" yielded 200 YouTube™ videos. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 131 videos were analyzed by three laparoscopic prostatectomy specialists. An evaluation was performed using scoring systems, including LAP-VEGaS, DISCERN, JAMA, GQS, and video power index (VPI). Results: Of the 131 videos, 88 (67%) were from individual participants (Group 1), and 43 (33%) were from corporate channels (Group 2). Group 2 demonstrated significantly higher JAMA, GQS, and mDISCERN scores (P = .028, .005, and .001, respectively). The LAP-VEGaS score was also higher in Group 2 (7.09 ± 0.43) compared to Group 1 (5.08 ± 0.26; P < .001). VPI values were significantly greater in Group 2 (P = .008). Conclusion: This study highlights a critical gap in the educational quality of LRP videos on YouTube™. Using comprehensive scoring systems, corporate channels consistently provided higher-quality educational content compared to individual contributors.

YouTube™腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术视频的教学质量。
简介:前列腺癌是男性中最常见的泌尿生殖系统癌症。根治性前列腺切除术仍然是局部前列腺癌治疗的金标准,微创手术(腹腔镜、机器人辅助腹腔镜)逐渐取代开放手术。YouTube™是一个受欢迎的数字平台,拥有大量与前列腺癌相关的视频,呈现出准确和误导性的内容。考虑到这些挑战,研究人员提出了评估框架来评估YouTube™视频的质量。本研究使用既定的视频评估标准评估YouTube™上腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)视频的教育充分性和背景相关性。方法:搜索关键词“腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术”,得到200个YouTube™视频。在应用纳入和排除标准后,由三名腹腔镜前列腺切除术专家对131个视频进行分析。采用评分系统进行评估,包括LAP-VEGaS、DISCERN、JAMA、GQS和视频功率指数(VPI)。结果:在131个视频中,88个(67%)来自个人参与者(第1组),43个(33%)来自公司渠道(第2组)。第2组表现出更高的JAMA, GQS和mDISCERN分数(P分别= 0.028,0.005和0.001)。2组LAP-VEGaS评分(7.09±0.43)高于1组(5.08±0.26);P < 0.001)。2组VPI值显著高于对照组(P = 0.008)。结论:本研究突出了YouTube™上LRP视频教育质量的关键差距。使用综合评分系统,与个人贡献者相比,公司频道始终提供更高质量的教育内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信