Deep learning-assisted detection of intracranial hemorrhage: validation and impact on reader performance.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Dong-Wan Kang, Museong Kim, Gi-Hun Park, Yong Soo Kim, Moon-Ku Han, Myungjae Lee, Dongmin Kim, Wi-Sun Ryu, Han-Gil Jeong
{"title":"Deep learning-assisted detection of intracranial hemorrhage: validation and impact on reader performance.","authors":"Dong-Wan Kang, Museong Kim, Gi-Hun Park, Yong Soo Kim, Moon-Ku Han, Myungjae Lee, Dongmin Kim, Wi-Sun Ryu, Han-Gil Jeong","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03560-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) requires urgent treatment, and accurate and timely diagnosis is essential for improving outcomes. This pivotal clinical trial aimed to validate a deep learning algorithm for ICH detection and assess its clinical utility through a reader performance test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective CT scans from patients with and without ICH were collected from a tertiary hospital. Two experts evaluated all scans, with a third expert reviewing disagreements for the final diagnosis. We analyzed the performance of the deep learning algorithm, JLK-ICH, for all cases and ICH subtypes. Additional external validation was performed using a multi-ethnic U.S.</p><p><strong>Dataset: </strong>A reader performance study included six non-expert readers who evaluated 800 CT scans, with and without JLK-ICH assistance, following a washout period. ICH presence and five-point scale confidence level for decisions were rated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,370 CT scans were evaluated. The deep learning model showed 98.7% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.8-99.3%), 88.5% specificity (95% CI, 83.6-92.3%), and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.936 (95% CI, 0.915-0.957). The model maintained high accuracy across all ICH subtypes, and additional external validation confirmed these results. In the reader performance study, AUROC with JLK-ICH assistance (0.967 [0.953-0.981]) surpassed that without assistance (0.953 [0.938-0.957]; P = 0.009). JLK-ICH particularly improved performance when readers were highly uncertain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The JLK-ICH algorithm demonstrated high accuracy in detecting all ICH subtypes. Non-expert readers significantly improved diagnostic accuracy for brain CT scans with deep learning assistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03560-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) requires urgent treatment, and accurate and timely diagnosis is essential for improving outcomes. This pivotal clinical trial aimed to validate a deep learning algorithm for ICH detection and assess its clinical utility through a reader performance test.

Methods: Retrospective CT scans from patients with and without ICH were collected from a tertiary hospital. Two experts evaluated all scans, with a third expert reviewing disagreements for the final diagnosis. We analyzed the performance of the deep learning algorithm, JLK-ICH, for all cases and ICH subtypes. Additional external validation was performed using a multi-ethnic U.S.

Dataset: A reader performance study included six non-expert readers who evaluated 800 CT scans, with and without JLK-ICH assistance, following a washout period. ICH presence and five-point scale confidence level for decisions were rated.

Results: A total of 1,370 CT scans were evaluated. The deep learning model showed 98.7% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.8-99.3%), 88.5% specificity (95% CI, 83.6-92.3%), and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.936 (95% CI, 0.915-0.957). The model maintained high accuracy across all ICH subtypes, and additional external validation confirmed these results. In the reader performance study, AUROC with JLK-ICH assistance (0.967 [0.953-0.981]) surpassed that without assistance (0.953 [0.938-0.957]; P = 0.009). JLK-ICH particularly improved performance when readers were highly uncertain.

Conclusion: The JLK-ICH algorithm demonstrated high accuracy in detecting all ICH subtypes. Non-expert readers significantly improved diagnostic accuracy for brain CT scans with deep learning assistance.

深度学习辅助检测颅内出血:验证及对阅读器性能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信