Passive versus active educational interventions for nevus and melanoma classification: A randomized controlled study.

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
M Spadafora, R Pampena, K Peris, L Del Regno, L Cornacchia, M C Fargnoli, C Pellegrini, P Quaglino, S Ribero, P G Calzavara-Pinton, M C Arisi, M Mirra, M Raucci, A Fusco, S Kaleci, J Chester, G Pellacani, C Longo
{"title":"Passive versus active educational interventions for nevus and melanoma classification: A randomized controlled study.","authors":"M Spadafora, R Pampena, K Peris, L Del Regno, L Cornacchia, M C Fargnoli, C Pellegrini, P Quaglino, S Ribero, P G Calzavara-Pinton, M C Arisi, M Mirra, M Raucci, A Fusco, S Kaleci, J Chester, G Pellacani, C Longo","doi":"10.1111/jdv.20649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Patients or family members first notice around 50% of primary melanoma lesions. Targeted educational campaigns for non-medical individuals improve melanoma detection rates, but the most effective initiatives are unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy of passive versus active intervention for non-medical individuals in classifying nevi and melanomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentric randomized controlled study randomly assigned subjects to receive active intervention (a dermatologist explaining basic rules for melanoma detection) or passive intervention (subject independently reading the basic rules). Subjects were asked to classify 60 clinical photos of nevi and melanomas as 'at risk' of malignancy and nominated the rule(s) they applied at 3 time points-before (T0), immediately following (T1), and 30 ± 2 days after (T2) the educational intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomized 364 patients. We included in the analysis 336 subjects (female 61.3%, 156 in the passive and 180 in the active intervention group) with a mean age of 44.5 years. Overall, detection rates of lesions 'at risk' improved from 71.2% (T0) to 86.4% (T1). At T2, detection rates were significantly higher after active intervention (83.7% vs. 86.8%, p = 0.017). Although an overall improvement was described after both interventions, rates of correct responses according to lesion-specific features were significantly higher in the active intervention group for lesions that met ugly duckling (UD) rule criteria at T1 and both rules (ABCDE and UD rules) criteria at T2. Correct (full or partial) rule applications were observed in 80% at T1 (40.2% and 38.4%, respectively) and at T2 (40.4% and 37.8%, respectively), with significantly higher correct rule application in the active group at T1 (p = 0.001) and T2 (p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Active educational intervention is more effective than passive education in improving nevi and melanomas classification and correct rule application in non-medical individuals, with stable performance observed over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":17351,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20649","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: Patients or family members first notice around 50% of primary melanoma lesions. Targeted educational campaigns for non-medical individuals improve melanoma detection rates, but the most effective initiatives are unclear.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of passive versus active intervention for non-medical individuals in classifying nevi and melanomas.

Methods: A multicentric randomized controlled study randomly assigned subjects to receive active intervention (a dermatologist explaining basic rules for melanoma detection) or passive intervention (subject independently reading the basic rules). Subjects were asked to classify 60 clinical photos of nevi and melanomas as 'at risk' of malignancy and nominated the rule(s) they applied at 3 time points-before (T0), immediately following (T1), and 30 ± 2 days after (T2) the educational intervention.

Results: We randomized 364 patients. We included in the analysis 336 subjects (female 61.3%, 156 in the passive and 180 in the active intervention group) with a mean age of 44.5 years. Overall, detection rates of lesions 'at risk' improved from 71.2% (T0) to 86.4% (T1). At T2, detection rates were significantly higher after active intervention (83.7% vs. 86.8%, p = 0.017). Although an overall improvement was described after both interventions, rates of correct responses according to lesion-specific features were significantly higher in the active intervention group for lesions that met ugly duckling (UD) rule criteria at T1 and both rules (ABCDE and UD rules) criteria at T2. Correct (full or partial) rule applications were observed in 80% at T1 (40.2% and 38.4%, respectively) and at T2 (40.4% and 37.8%, respectively), with significantly higher correct rule application in the active group at T1 (p = 0.001) and T2 (p = 0.03).

Conclusions: Active educational intervention is more effective than passive education in improving nevi and melanomas classification and correct rule application in non-medical individuals, with stable performance observed over time.

被动与主动教育干预对痣和黑色素瘤分类的影响:一项随机对照研究。
背景:患者或家属首先注意到约50%的原发性黑色素瘤病变。针对非医疗个体的有针对性的教育活动提高了黑色素瘤的检出率,但最有效的举措尚不清楚。目的:比较被动干预和主动干预对非医学个体分类痣和黑色素瘤的疗效。方法:采用多中心随机对照研究,随机将受试者分为主动干预组(皮肤科医生讲解黑色素瘤检测基本规则)和被动干预组(受试者独立阅读基本规则)。受试者被要求将60张痣和黑素瘤的临床照片归类为恶性肿瘤的“危险”,并在3个时间点(教育干预前(T0)、紧接着(T1)和30±2天后(T2))指定他们应用的规则。结果:我们随机抽取了364例患者。我们纳入了336名受试者(女性61.3%,被动干预组156名,主动干预组180名),平均年龄为44.5岁。总体而言,“危险”病变的检出率从71.2% (T1)提高到86.4% (T1)。T2时,积极干预后的检出率显著高于对照组(83.7% vs. 86.8%, p = 0.017)。虽然在两种干预措施后均有总体改善,但在T1和T2时符合丑小鸭(UD)规则和两种规则(ABCDE和UD规则)标准的病变中,积极干预组根据病变特异性特征的正确反应率明显更高。在T1(分别为40.2%和38.4%)和T2(分别为40.4%和37.8%)时,80%的患者正确(全部或部分)应用了规则,在T1 (p = 0.001)和T2 (p = 0.03)时,积极组的规则应用正确率显著提高。结论:主动教育干预在改善非医学个体痣、黑素瘤的分类和正确应用规则方面比被动教育更有效,且随时间的推移表现稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
874
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (JEADV) is a publication that focuses on dermatology and venereology. It covers various topics within these fields, including both clinical and basic science subjects. The journal publishes articles in different formats, such as editorials, review articles, practice articles, original papers, short reports, letters to the editor, features, and announcements from the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV). The journal covers a wide range of keywords, including allergy, cancer, clinical medicine, cytokines, dermatology, drug reactions, hair disease, laser therapy, nail disease, oncology, skin cancer, skin disease, therapeutics, tumors, virus infections, and venereology. The JEADV is indexed and abstracted by various databases and resources, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Embase, Global Health, InfoTrac, Ingenta Select, MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信