Ian H de Boer, Lisa D Anderson, Nathaniel K Ashford, Ernest Ayers, Nisha Bansal, Yoshio N Hall, Irl B Hirsch, Andrew N Hoofnagle, Simon Hsu, Evelin Jones, Benjamin Lidgard, Christine P Limonte, Lori J Linke, Chris C Marnell, Laura Mayeda, Elizabeth McNamara, Rajnish Mehrotra, Anne Pesenson, Julie M Porter, Matthew B Rivara, Glenda V Roberts, Beth Shanaman, Subbulaxmi Trikudanathan, Suzanne Watnick, Katy G Wilkens, Leila R Zelnick
{"title":"Glycemia Assessed by Continuous Glucose Monitoring among People Treated with Maintenance Dialysis.","authors":"Ian H de Boer, Lisa D Anderson, Nathaniel K Ashford, Ernest Ayers, Nisha Bansal, Yoshio N Hall, Irl B Hirsch, Andrew N Hoofnagle, Simon Hsu, Evelin Jones, Benjamin Lidgard, Christine P Limonte, Lori J Linke, Chris C Marnell, Laura Mayeda, Elizabeth McNamara, Rajnish Mehrotra, Anne Pesenson, Julie M Porter, Matthew B Rivara, Glenda V Roberts, Beth Shanaman, Subbulaxmi Trikudanathan, Suzanne Watnick, Katy G Wilkens, Leila R Zelnick","doi":"10.1681/ASN.0000000693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney failure and its treatments disrupt glucose homeostasis in ways that may promote both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) delineates detailed glycemic profiles, but published studies in kidney failure are limited to small, select groups. We aimed to characterize the spectrum of glycemia and its determinants in a large, diverse maintenance dialysis population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective community-based cohort study of people treated with maintenance dialysis. Each participant wore a Dexcom G6 Pro CGM for approximately 10 days. Outcomes ascertained by CGM included mean blood glucose, time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL), and hypoglycemia events (sustained <70 mg/dL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 420 demographically diverse participants, including 263 with diabetes (of whom 88 were untreated with glucose-lowering medications) and 157 without diabetes. Peritoneal dialysis was used by 55. Outcomes varied by diabetes status and dialysis modality. Among participants without diabetes, mean blood glucose was higher with peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis (141 vs 121 mg/dL, p<0.001). Among participants with untreated diabetes, mean blood glucose was 162 mg/dL, mean TIR 71%, and only 64% of participants attained TIR ≥70%, while mean hemoglobin A1c was 5.7%. Among participants with treated diabetes, mean blood glucose was 214 mg/dL, mean TIR 43%, and only 22% of participants attained TIR ≥70%, while mean hemoglobin A1c was 7.0%. 714 unique sustained hypoglycemia events were observed, with highest rates for participants without diabetes. In addition to diabetes and dialysis modality, age, dialysis vintage, insulin use, hemoglobin A1c, and serum albumin were significantly associated with mean blood glucose, hypoglycemia, or both.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In maintenance dialysis, CGM frequently identifies both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia that may not be clinically evident. In particular, hyperglycemia is common with peritoneal dialysis, patients with untreated diabetes maintain a diabetic glycemic profile, and patients with treated diabetes rarely meet contemporary CGM-based treatment targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":17217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.0000000693","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Kidney failure and its treatments disrupt glucose homeostasis in ways that may promote both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) delineates detailed glycemic profiles, but published studies in kidney failure are limited to small, select groups. We aimed to characterize the spectrum of glycemia and its determinants in a large, diverse maintenance dialysis population.
Methods: We conducted a prospective community-based cohort study of people treated with maintenance dialysis. Each participant wore a Dexcom G6 Pro CGM for approximately 10 days. Outcomes ascertained by CGM included mean blood glucose, time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL), and hypoglycemia events (sustained <70 mg/dL).
Results: We enrolled 420 demographically diverse participants, including 263 with diabetes (of whom 88 were untreated with glucose-lowering medications) and 157 without diabetes. Peritoneal dialysis was used by 55. Outcomes varied by diabetes status and dialysis modality. Among participants without diabetes, mean blood glucose was higher with peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis (141 vs 121 mg/dL, p<0.001). Among participants with untreated diabetes, mean blood glucose was 162 mg/dL, mean TIR 71%, and only 64% of participants attained TIR ≥70%, while mean hemoglobin A1c was 5.7%. Among participants with treated diabetes, mean blood glucose was 214 mg/dL, mean TIR 43%, and only 22% of participants attained TIR ≥70%, while mean hemoglobin A1c was 7.0%. 714 unique sustained hypoglycemia events were observed, with highest rates for participants without diabetes. In addition to diabetes and dialysis modality, age, dialysis vintage, insulin use, hemoglobin A1c, and serum albumin were significantly associated with mean blood glucose, hypoglycemia, or both.
Conclusions: In maintenance dialysis, CGM frequently identifies both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia that may not be clinically evident. In particular, hyperglycemia is common with peritoneal dialysis, patients with untreated diabetes maintain a diabetic glycemic profile, and patients with treated diabetes rarely meet contemporary CGM-based treatment targets.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN) stands as the preeminent kidney journal globally, offering an exceptional synthesis of cutting-edge basic research, clinical epidemiology, meta-analysis, and relevant editorial content. Representing a comprehensive resource, JASN encompasses clinical research, editorials distilling key findings, perspectives, and timely reviews.
Editorials are skillfully crafted to elucidate the essential insights of the parent article, while JASN actively encourages the submission of Letters to the Editor discussing recently published articles. The reviews featured in JASN are consistently erudite and comprehensive, providing thorough coverage of respective fields. Since its inception in July 1990, JASN has been a monthly publication.
JASN publishes original research reports and editorial content across a spectrum of basic and clinical science relevant to the broad discipline of nephrology. Topics covered include renal cell biology, developmental biology of the kidney, genetics of kidney disease, cell and transport physiology, hemodynamics and vascular regulation, mechanisms of blood pressure regulation, renal immunology, kidney pathology, pathophysiology of kidney diseases, nephrolithiasis, clinical nephrology (including dialysis and transplantation), and hypertension. Furthermore, articles addressing healthcare policy and care delivery issues relevant to nephrology are warmly welcomed.