Systematic Method for Classifying Multiple Congenital Anomaly Cases in Electronic Health Records.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Elly Brokamp, Tyne Miller-Fleming, Alexandra Scalici, Gillian Hooker, Rizwan Hamid, Digna Velez Edwards, Wendy Chung, Yuan Luo, Krzysztof Kiryluk, Nita A Limidi, Nikhil K Khankari, Nancy J Cox, Lisa Bastarache, Megan M Shuey
{"title":"Systematic Method for Classifying Multiple Congenital Anomaly Cases in Electronic Health Records.","authors":"Elly Brokamp, Tyne Miller-Fleming, Alexandra Scalici, Gillian Hooker, Rizwan Hamid, Digna Velez Edwards, Wendy Chung, Yuan Luo, Krzysztof Kiryluk, Nita A Limidi, Nikhil K Khankari, Nancy J Cox, Lisa Bastarache, Megan M Shuey","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2025.101415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Congenital anomalies (CAs) affect ∼3% of live births and are the leading cause of infant morbidity and mortality. Many individuals have multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), a constellation of two or more unrelated CAs, yet there is no consensus on how to systematically identify these individuals in electronic health records (EHR). We developed a scalable method to characterize MCA in the EHR, allowing for the dramatic improvement of our understanding of the genetic and epidemiological underpinnings of MCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From Vanderbilt University Medical Center's anonymized EHR database, we evaluated three different approaches for classifying MCA, including a novel approach that removed \"minor vs. major\" differentiation and their associated clinical utilization and population characteristics. Using phenome-wide association studies, we assessed the phenome associated with previously classified \"minor\" CAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our proposed universal method for MCA identification in the EHR is accurate (PPV= 97.1%), associated with heightened hospital utilization (41% receiving inpatient care), and captures granular patterns of CAs. A secondary application of our method was done in two separate cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed a method to comprehensively identify individuals with MCA in the EHR, allowing researchers to better investigate the genetic etiologies of MCA. This method can be applied across EHR databases with billing codes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101415"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2025.101415","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Congenital anomalies (CAs) affect ∼3% of live births and are the leading cause of infant morbidity and mortality. Many individuals have multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), a constellation of two or more unrelated CAs, yet there is no consensus on how to systematically identify these individuals in electronic health records (EHR). We developed a scalable method to characterize MCA in the EHR, allowing for the dramatic improvement of our understanding of the genetic and epidemiological underpinnings of MCA.

Methods: From Vanderbilt University Medical Center's anonymized EHR database, we evaluated three different approaches for classifying MCA, including a novel approach that removed "minor vs. major" differentiation and their associated clinical utilization and population characteristics. Using phenome-wide association studies, we assessed the phenome associated with previously classified "minor" CAs.

Results: Our proposed universal method for MCA identification in the EHR is accurate (PPV= 97.1%), associated with heightened hospital utilization (41% receiving inpatient care), and captures granular patterns of CAs. A secondary application of our method was done in two separate cohorts.

Conclusion: We developed a method to comprehensively identify individuals with MCA in the EHR, allowing researchers to better investigate the genetic etiologies of MCA. This method can be applied across EHR databases with billing codes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信