2024 Revision of the level of evidence grading system for ESC clinical practice guideline recommendations I: therapy and prevention.

IF 37.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Peter Jüni, Sotiris Antoniou, Elena Arbelo, Sergio Buccheri, Maja Cikes, Bruno R da Costa, Laurent Fauchier, Chris P Gale, Sigrun Halvorsen, Stefan James, Konstantinos C Koskinas, Dipak Kotecha, Ulf Landmesser, Basil S Lewis, Maja-Lisa Løchen, Jens Cosedis Nielsen, Xavier Rosselló, Ilonca Vaartjes, Eva B Prescott, Colin Baigent
{"title":"2024 Revision of the level of evidence grading system for ESC clinical practice guideline recommendations I: therapy and prevention.","authors":"Peter Jüni, Sotiris Antoniou, Elena Arbelo, Sergio Buccheri, Maja Cikes, Bruno R da Costa, Laurent Fauchier, Chris P Gale, Sigrun Halvorsen, Stefan James, Konstantinos C Koskinas, Dipak Kotecha, Ulf Landmesser, Basil S Lewis, Maja-Lisa Løchen, Jens Cosedis Nielsen, Xavier Rosselló, Ilonca Vaartjes, Eva B Prescott, Colin Baigent","doi":"10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The level of evidence (LOE) grading system for ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines classifies the quality of the evidence supporting a recommendation. However, the current taxonomy does not fully consider the optimal study design necessary to establish evidence for such recommendations. Therefore, two separate taskforces of clinical and methodological experts were appointed by the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee, with the first tasked with updating the LOE grading system for therapy and prevention, and the second responsible for developing a LOE grading system for diagnosis and prediction. The updated system for therapy and prevention presented here maintains the three-level grading structure but uses revised definitions. Level of evidence A represents conclusive evidence usually from ≥2 adequately powered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) free from major bias, with substantial evidence against the play of chance when combined in a meta-analysis (e.g. P < .005 for superiority). Additional criteria are specified to define substantial evidence against the play of chance in case of non-inferiority, equivalence, and harm. Level of evidence B is now subdivided into B1 and B2. Level of evidence B1 represents suggestive evidence usually from ≥1 adequately powered RCT free from major bias, or a meta-analysis of such RCTs, with some evidence against the play of chance (e.g. P < .05 for superiority). Level of evidence B2 represents limited evidence from ≥2 adequately powered non-randomized studies with careful control of major sources of bias or from a meta-analysis of small, underpowered RCTs. Level of evidence C represents preliminary evidence from either non-randomized studies without careful control of major sources of bias, a single small, underpowered RCT, or expert consensus.</p>","PeriodicalId":11976,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":37.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The level of evidence (LOE) grading system for ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines classifies the quality of the evidence supporting a recommendation. However, the current taxonomy does not fully consider the optimal study design necessary to establish evidence for such recommendations. Therefore, two separate taskforces of clinical and methodological experts were appointed by the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee, with the first tasked with updating the LOE grading system for therapy and prevention, and the second responsible for developing a LOE grading system for diagnosis and prediction. The updated system for therapy and prevention presented here maintains the three-level grading structure but uses revised definitions. Level of evidence A represents conclusive evidence usually from ≥2 adequately powered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) free from major bias, with substantial evidence against the play of chance when combined in a meta-analysis (e.g. P < .005 for superiority). Additional criteria are specified to define substantial evidence against the play of chance in case of non-inferiority, equivalence, and harm. Level of evidence B is now subdivided into B1 and B2. Level of evidence B1 represents suggestive evidence usually from ≥1 adequately powered RCT free from major bias, or a meta-analysis of such RCTs, with some evidence against the play of chance (e.g. P < .05 for superiority). Level of evidence B2 represents limited evidence from ≥2 adequately powered non-randomized studies with careful control of major sources of bias or from a meta-analysis of small, underpowered RCTs. Level of evidence C represents preliminary evidence from either non-randomized studies without careful control of major sources of bias, a single small, underpowered RCT, or expert consensus.

ESC临床实践指南的证据级别(LOE)分级系统对支持某项建议的证据质量进行了分类。然而,目前的分类法并未充分考虑为此类建议确立证据所需的最佳研究设计。因此,临床实践指南委员会分别任命了两个由临床和方法学专家组成的工作组,第一个工作组负责更新治疗和预防的LOE分级系统,第二个工作组负责制定诊断和预测的LOE分级系统。本文介绍的更新后的治疗和预防系统保留了三级分级结构,但使用了修订后的定义。A级证据代表确凿证据,通常来自于≥2项无重大偏倚、有充分证据支持的随机对照试验(RCTs),在荟萃分析(meta-analysis)中有实质性证据证明其不存在偶然性(如P < .005表示优越性)。在非劣效性、等效性和危害性的情况下,还规定了其他标准,以界定反对偶然性的实质性证据。证据等级 B 现细分为 B1 和 B2。证据 B1 级代表提示性证据,通常来自于≥1 项无重大偏倚、有充分证据支持的 RCT,或对此类 RCT 的荟萃分析,其中有一些反对偶然性的证据(如 P < .05 为优越性)。B2 级证据代表来自≥2 项有充分证据支持的非随机研究的有限证据,这些研究仔细控制了主要的偏倚来源,或来自对小型、证据不足的研究性试验的荟萃分析。C级证据代表来自未仔细控制主要偏倚来源的非随机研究、单项小型、效力不足的RCT或专家共识的初步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Heart Journal
European Heart Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
39.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
3942
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal is a renowned international journal that focuses on cardiovascular medicine. It is published weekly and is the official journal of the European Society of Cardiology. This peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing high-quality clinical and scientific material pertaining to all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. It covers a diverse range of topics including research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. Moreover, the journal serves as a platform for the exchange of information and discussions on various aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational matters. In addition to original papers on cardiovascular medicine and surgery, the European Heart Journal also presents reviews, clinical perspectives, ESC Guidelines, and editorial articles that highlight recent advancements in cardiology. Additionally, the journal actively encourages readers to share their thoughts and opinions through correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信