T-shaped dysmorphic uterus: discrepancies between current 3D-ultrasound diagnostic criteria

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Giulia Monaco, Elvira Nocita, Aikaterini Selntigia, Consuelo Russo, Daniele Farsetti, Sabrina Reppuccia, Carlo De Angelis, Brunella Zizolfi, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo, Caterina Exacoustos
{"title":"T-shaped dysmorphic uterus: discrepancies between current 3D-ultrasound diagnostic criteria","authors":"Giulia Monaco,&nbsp;Elvira Nocita,&nbsp;Aikaterini Selntigia,&nbsp;Consuelo Russo,&nbsp;Daniele Farsetti,&nbsp;Sabrina Reppuccia,&nbsp;Carlo De Angelis,&nbsp;Brunella Zizolfi,&nbsp;Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo,&nbsp;Caterina Exacoustos","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-07986-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Review and compare current classifications for diagnosing T-shaped uterus using three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D-TVS) measurements, identifying measurements that best correlate with the diagnosis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study analyzed diagnostic measurements in patients with T-shaped uterus who underwent 3D-TVS at the University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’ from 2016 to 2022. Of 7588 patients, four sonographers re-evaluated 3D-TVS images of 72 initially diagnosed cases. Uterine morphology was assessed in the coronal plane by measuring fundal cavity width (R0), corpus-isthmic cavity width (Wi), lateral indentation angle (AI), lateral bulging (LB), T-angle (AT), fundal/isthmic cavity width ratio (R0/Wi), and the length of intracavitary line parallel to interostial line (R10). All cases were confirmed by hysteroscopy, excluding ambiguous findings.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 72 initially evaluated patients, 50 met the inclusion criteria for final analysis. These patients had consistent 3D-TVS diagnoses from four sonographers and hysteroscopic confirmation from two experts. The combination of three CUME criteria (AT ≤ 40°, AI ≤ 130°, LB ≥ 7 mm) identified only 8% of T-shaped uteri. Notably, 30 patients (60%) had an R10 measurement of ≤ 10 mm. In addition, 31 uteri (62%) met all three criteria: LB ≥ 5 mm, AI ≤ 140°, and R0/Wi ≥ 5. Overall, 48 uteri (96%) satisfied at least two criteria. The study concluded that LB, R10, and R0/Wi are independent predictors of T-shaped uterus.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Significant discrepancies exist among current classifications for diagnosing T-shaped uterus. This study identified LB, R10, and R0/Wi as key parameters for accurate diagnosis. These measurements provide a precise and objective approach, aiding in the evaluation of the anomaly's impact on reproductive outcomes and the benefits of hysteroscopic treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"311 6","pages":"1657 - 1666"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-025-07986-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-025-07986-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Review and compare current classifications for diagnosing T-shaped uterus using three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D-TVS) measurements, identifying measurements that best correlate with the diagnosis.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed diagnostic measurements in patients with T-shaped uterus who underwent 3D-TVS at the University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’ from 2016 to 2022. Of 7588 patients, four sonographers re-evaluated 3D-TVS images of 72 initially diagnosed cases. Uterine morphology was assessed in the coronal plane by measuring fundal cavity width (R0), corpus-isthmic cavity width (Wi), lateral indentation angle (AI), lateral bulging (LB), T-angle (AT), fundal/isthmic cavity width ratio (R0/Wi), and the length of intracavitary line parallel to interostial line (R10). All cases were confirmed by hysteroscopy, excluding ambiguous findings.

Results

Of 72 initially evaluated patients, 50 met the inclusion criteria for final analysis. These patients had consistent 3D-TVS diagnoses from four sonographers and hysteroscopic confirmation from two experts. The combination of three CUME criteria (AT ≤ 40°, AI ≤ 130°, LB ≥ 7 mm) identified only 8% of T-shaped uteri. Notably, 30 patients (60%) had an R10 measurement of ≤ 10 mm. In addition, 31 uteri (62%) met all three criteria: LB ≥ 5 mm, AI ≤ 140°, and R0/Wi ≥ 5. Overall, 48 uteri (96%) satisfied at least two criteria. The study concluded that LB, R10, and R0/Wi are independent predictors of T-shaped uterus.

Conclusions

Significant discrepancies exist among current classifications for diagnosing T-shaped uterus. This study identified LB, R10, and R0/Wi as key parameters for accurate diagnosis. These measurements provide a precise and objective approach, aiding in the evaluation of the anomaly's impact on reproductive outcomes and the benefits of hysteroscopic treatment.

t型畸形子宫:目前3d超声诊断标准的差异。
目的:回顾和比较目前使用三维经阴道超声(3D-TVS)测量诊断t型子宫的分类,确定与诊断最相关的测量。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了2016年至2022年在罗马大学(Tor Vergata)接受3d电视治疗的t型子宫患者的诊断指标。在7588名患者中,4名超声医师重新评估了72例最初诊断病例的3d电视图像。通过测量基底腔宽度(R0)、体峡腔宽度(Wi)、侧凹陷角(AI)、侧隆起角(LB)、t角(AT)、基底/峡腔宽度比(R0/Wi)、腔内线平行于腔间线长度(R10)在冠状面评价子宫形态。所有病例均经宫腔镜确诊,排除不明确的发现。结果:72例初始评估患者中,50例符合最终分析的纳入标准。这些患者有四位超声医师一致的3D-TVS诊断和两位专家的宫腔镜确认。结合三个CUME标准(AT≤40°,AI≤130°,LB≥7 mm),仅能识别出8%的t型子宫。值得注意的是,30例(60%)患者的R10测量值≤10 mm。此外,31例(62%)子宫符合LB≥5 mm、AI≤140°、R0/Wi≥5三个标准。总的来说,48例子宫(96%)满足至少两个标准。本研究认为LB、R10和R0/Wi是t型子宫的独立预测因子。结论:目前诊断t型子宫的分类存在显著差异。本研究确定LB、R10和R0/Wi为准确诊断的关键参数。这些测量提供了一种精确和客观的方法,有助于评估异常对生殖结果的影响和宫腔镜治疗的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信