Use of piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem in a Danish intensive care unit.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hanna Jernberg, Marie Warrer Munch, Maj-Brit Nørregaard Kjær, Marie Helleberg, Morten Hylander Møller, Anders Perner
{"title":"Use of piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem in a Danish intensive care unit.","authors":"Hanna Jernberg, Marie Warrer Munch, Maj-Brit Nørregaard Kjær, Marie Helleberg, Morten Hylander Møller, Anders Perner","doi":"10.61409/A02240081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intensive care unit (ICU) patients often have infections, and early empirical treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics is recommended. As the choice between different agents is not supported by high-certainty evidence and as a part of a larger research programme, we aimed to describe the use of piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) and meropenem (MER) in patients in a university hospital ICU in Denmark and the patient outcomes of each of these treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively screened all patients admitted to the general 24-bed ICU at Rigshospitalet for 12 consecutive weeks as from 1 November 2022. Patients were included if they received PTZ or MER during their ICU stay. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 286 patients, 184 (64%) received PTZ and/or MER; 112 (61%) were men, and 161 (88%) received life support. Among these, 80 (43%) received PTZ, 76 (41%) received MER and 28 (15%) received both agents, mainly as empirical treatment. At 90 days, 22 (28%) had died among patients receiving PTZ, 19 (26%) among those receiving MER and eight (29%) among those receiving both agents. At 90 days, 19 cases of a bacterium with new acquired resistance were identified in 17 of the 184 patients (9%) (eight cases among those receiving PTZ, five among those receiving MER, and six among those treated with both agents); vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) accounted for 16 of the 19 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients in the ICU of a Danish university hospital received antibiotic treatment with PTZ and/or MER, mainly as empirical treatment. Mortality and the occurrence of bacteria with new acquired resistance, mainly VRE, appeared to the same extent in the groups.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"71 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A02240081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients often have infections, and early empirical treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics is recommended. As the choice between different agents is not supported by high-certainty evidence and as a part of a larger research programme, we aimed to describe the use of piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) and meropenem (MER) in patients in a university hospital ICU in Denmark and the patient outcomes of each of these treatments.

Methods: We prospectively screened all patients admitted to the general 24-bed ICU at Rigshospitalet for 12 consecutive weeks as from 1 November 2022. Patients were included if they received PTZ or MER during their ICU stay. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality.

Results: Among 286 patients, 184 (64%) received PTZ and/or MER; 112 (61%) were men, and 161 (88%) received life support. Among these, 80 (43%) received PTZ, 76 (41%) received MER and 28 (15%) received both agents, mainly as empirical treatment. At 90 days, 22 (28%) had died among patients receiving PTZ, 19 (26%) among those receiving MER and eight (29%) among those receiving both agents. At 90 days, 19 cases of a bacterium with new acquired resistance were identified in 17 of the 184 patients (9%) (eight cases among those receiving PTZ, five among those receiving MER, and six among those treated with both agents); vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) accounted for 16 of the 19 cases.

Conclusions: Most patients in the ICU of a Danish university hospital received antibiotic treatment with PTZ and/or MER, mainly as empirical treatment. Mortality and the occurrence of bacteria with new acquired resistance, mainly VRE, appeared to the same extent in the groups.

Funding: None.

Trial registration: Not relevant.

哌拉西林/他唑巴坦和美罗培南在丹麦重症监护病房的应用。
重症监护病房(ICU)患者经常发生感染,建议早期使用广谱抗生素进行经验性治疗。由于不同药物之间的选择没有高确定性的证据支持,并且作为更大研究计划的一部分,我们旨在描述丹麦一所大学医院ICU患者使用哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(PTZ)和美罗培南(MER)的情况,以及每种治疗方法的患者结果。方法:前瞻性筛选自2022年11月1日起连续12周入住Rigshospitalet普通24床ICU的所有患者。纳入在ICU住院期间接受PTZ或MER治疗的患者。主要终点为90天死亡率。结果:286例患者中,184例(64%)接受PTZ和/或MER治疗;男性112例(61%),接受生命维持的161例(88%)。其中PTZ治疗80例(43%),MER治疗76例(41%),双药治疗28例(15%),以经验治疗为主。在90天时,接受PTZ治疗的患者中有22例(28%)死亡,接受MER治疗的患者中有19例(26%)死亡,两种药物治疗的患者中有8例(29%)死亡。在第90天,184例患者中有17例(9%)发现19例新的获得性耐药细菌(接受PTZ治疗的患者中有8例,接受MER治疗的患者中有5例,同时接受两种药物治疗的患者中有6例);19例中有16例为耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)。结论:丹麦某大学医院ICU患者多采用PTZ和/或MER联合抗生素治疗,以经验性治疗为主。各组的死亡率和新获得性耐药菌(以VRE为主)的出现程度相同。资金:没有。试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信