Á Csóka, S E Simon, T P Farkas, S Szász, Z Sütő, Ö Petneházy, G Kovács, I Repa, T Donkó
{"title":"<i>In vivo</i> estimation of chicken breast and thigh muscle weights using multi-atlas-based elastic registration on computed tomography images.","authors":"Á Csóka, S E Simon, T P Farkas, S Szász, Z Sütő, Ö Petneházy, G Kovács, I Repa, T Donkó","doi":"10.1080/00071668.2025.2472903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>1. This study employed an automated estimation method for quantitatively assessing valuable meat parts in broiler chickens. This involved the segmentation of computed tomography (CT) images through elastic registration, utilising feature and model selection.2. Sixty Tetra HB colour broiler chickens (30 males and 30 females) were randomly selected and examined by CT at 10 weeks of age (live weight: 2560 ± 400 g). The animals were slaughtered, and their breast and thigh muscles were dissected and weighed (thigh and breast weights were 90 ± 19 g and 337 ± 58 g). Multi-atlas registration was used for segmentation, followed by feature extraction (256 features/individual) from the CT images.3. Four different regression analysis techniques (linear, PLS, lasso and ridge) with and without feature selection were applied to the collected data with k-fold cross-validation for estimating the thigh and breast muscle weights. The feature selection produced significantly better results in all cases.4. Among the analysis techniques, lasso and ridge regression performed the best for both muscle groups (thigh and breast muscles). These were as follows: lasso for breast: r<sup>2</sup> = 0.993, RMSE = 4.87 g; ridge for breast: r<sup>2</sup> = 0.995, RMSE = 4.03 g; lasso for thigh: r<sup>2</sup> = 0.976, RMSE = 2.94 g; and ridge for thigh: r<sup>2</sup> = 0.965, RMSE = 3.53 g.5. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of the automated method, initially tested on rabbits, in accurately estimating valuable meat parts of broiler chickens. The robust performance of the selected regression models underscores the potential for widespread application in poultry production, offering a reliable and efficient means of quantitative assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9322,"journal":{"name":"British Poultry Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Poultry Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2025.2472903","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
1. This study employed an automated estimation method for quantitatively assessing valuable meat parts in broiler chickens. This involved the segmentation of computed tomography (CT) images through elastic registration, utilising feature and model selection.2. Sixty Tetra HB colour broiler chickens (30 males and 30 females) were randomly selected and examined by CT at 10 weeks of age (live weight: 2560 ± 400 g). The animals were slaughtered, and their breast and thigh muscles were dissected and weighed (thigh and breast weights were 90 ± 19 g and 337 ± 58 g). Multi-atlas registration was used for segmentation, followed by feature extraction (256 features/individual) from the CT images.3. Four different regression analysis techniques (linear, PLS, lasso and ridge) with and without feature selection were applied to the collected data with k-fold cross-validation for estimating the thigh and breast muscle weights. The feature selection produced significantly better results in all cases.4. Among the analysis techniques, lasso and ridge regression performed the best for both muscle groups (thigh and breast muscles). These were as follows: lasso for breast: r2 = 0.993, RMSE = 4.87 g; ridge for breast: r2 = 0.995, RMSE = 4.03 g; lasso for thigh: r2 = 0.976, RMSE = 2.94 g; and ridge for thigh: r2 = 0.965, RMSE = 3.53 g.5. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of the automated method, initially tested on rabbits, in accurately estimating valuable meat parts of broiler chickens. The robust performance of the selected regression models underscores the potential for widespread application in poultry production, offering a reliable and efficient means of quantitative assessment.
期刊介绍:
From its first volume in 1960, British Poultry Science has been a leading international journal for poultry scientists and advisers to the poultry industry throughout the world. Over 60% of the independently refereed papers published originate outside the UK. Most typically they report the results of biological studies with an experimental approach which either make an original contribution to fundamental science or are of obvious application to the industry. Subjects which are covered include: anatomy, embryology, biochemistry, biophysics, physiology, reproduction and genetics, behaviour, microbiology, endocrinology, nutrition, environmental science, food science, feeding stuffs and feeding, management and housing welfare, breeding, hatching, poultry meat and egg yields and quality.Papers that adopt a modelling approach or describe the scientific background to new equipment or apparatus directly relevant to the industry are also published. The journal also features rapid publication of Short Communications. Summaries of papers presented at the Spring Meeting of the UK Branch of the WPSA are published in British Poultry Abstracts .