Downstream Effects of Omission of Axillary Surgery in Older Adults with Early-Stage HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17196-x
Eliza H Lorentzen, Kenny Nguyen, Yu-Jen Chen, Tari A King, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Christina A Minami
{"title":"Downstream Effects of Omission of Axillary Surgery in Older Adults with Early-Stage HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer.","authors":"Eliza H Lorentzen, Kenny Nguyen, Yu-Jen Chen, Tari A King, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Christina A Minami","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17196-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Trial data demonstrate that omission of select locoregional therapies in women ≥ 70 years with early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer does not affect overall survival. However, the potential downstream effects of omitting sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) on rates of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and endocrine therapy (ET) are unclear. We examined the association between SLNB omission, RT referral rates, RT receipt, and ET adherence in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients ≥ 70 years with unifocal cT1-2N0 HR+/HER2- disease undergoing upfront lumpectomy from January 2016 to January 2021 were identified from an institutional database. Radiotherapy referral, receipt, and ET adherence were examined by SLNB receipt. Multivariate logistic regression adjusting for patient and disease-level characteristics was used to assess factors associated with RT receipt and ET adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 670 patients, 460 (68.7%) had SLNB omitted. Only 19 (9.0%) who underwent SLNB were node-positive. Radiotherapy referrals were made for 68.5% of patients. More patients who underwent SLNB received RT referral (90.5%), treatment (77.4%), and were ET-adherent (77.6%) (p < 0.001). On adjusted analyses, patients ≥ 80 years and those with SLNB omitted were less likely to receive RT and be ET adherent. There was no difference in ipsilateral breast recurrence by SLNB performance (2.6% [SLNB] vs. 2.4% [no-SLNB], p = 0.86), or by RT receipt (2.7% [RT] vs. 2.4% [no-RT], p = 0.77) at a median 3.6 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Omission of SLNB is associated with a lower likelihood of subsequent RT referral, receipt, and ET adherence. Locoregional rates did not differ by SLNB or RT receipt, suggesting that global de-escalation of locoregional therapies may be considered in older candidates.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"4838-4846"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17196-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Trial data demonstrate that omission of select locoregional therapies in women ≥ 70 years with early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer does not affect overall survival. However, the potential downstream effects of omitting sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) on rates of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and endocrine therapy (ET) are unclear. We examined the association between SLNB omission, RT referral rates, RT receipt, and ET adherence in this population.

Methods: Patients ≥ 70 years with unifocal cT1-2N0 HR+/HER2- disease undergoing upfront lumpectomy from January 2016 to January 2021 were identified from an institutional database. Radiotherapy referral, receipt, and ET adherence were examined by SLNB receipt. Multivariate logistic regression adjusting for patient and disease-level characteristics was used to assess factors associated with RT receipt and ET adherence.

Results: Of 670 patients, 460 (68.7%) had SLNB omitted. Only 19 (9.0%) who underwent SLNB were node-positive. Radiotherapy referrals were made for 68.5% of patients. More patients who underwent SLNB received RT referral (90.5%), treatment (77.4%), and were ET-adherent (77.6%) (p < 0.001). On adjusted analyses, patients ≥ 80 years and those with SLNB omitted were less likely to receive RT and be ET adherent. There was no difference in ipsilateral breast recurrence by SLNB performance (2.6% [SLNB] vs. 2.4% [no-SLNB], p = 0.86), or by RT receipt (2.7% [RT] vs. 2.4% [no-RT], p = 0.77) at a median 3.6 years.

Conclusions: Omission of SLNB is associated with a lower likelihood of subsequent RT referral, receipt, and ET adherence. Locoregional rates did not differ by SLNB or RT receipt, suggesting that global de-escalation of locoregional therapies may be considered in older candidates.

省略腋窝手术对老年早期HR+/HER2-乳腺癌的下游影响
目的:试验数据表明,≥70岁早期HR+/HER2-乳腺癌患者忽略局部选择性治疗不会影响总生存期。然而,省略前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)对辅助放疗(RT)和内分泌治疗(ET)率的潜在下游影响尚不清楚。我们研究了该人群SLNB遗漏、RT转诊率、RT接收和ET依从性之间的关系。方法:从一个机构数据库中确定2016年1月至2021年1月期间接受乳房肿瘤切除术的≥70岁单灶性cT1-2N0 HR+/HER2-疾病患者。通过SLNB收据检查放疗转诊、接收和ET依从性。采用调整患者和疾病水平特征的多因素logistic回归来评估与RT接受和ET依从性相关的因素。结果:670例患者中,460例(68.7%)切除了SLNB。接受SLNB的患者中仅有19例(9.0%)淋巴结阳性。68.5%的患者转诊放疗。更多接受SLNB的患者接受了RT转诊(90.5%)、治疗(77.4%)和ET依从性(77.6%)(p)。结论:遗漏SLNB与后续RT转诊、接受和ET依从性的可能性较低相关。局部区域发生率没有因接受SLNB或RT而不同,这表明在老年候选人中可以考虑局部区域治疗的整体降级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信