Digital PCR assays for quantifying trichothecene-producing Fusarium species, including Fusarium langsethiae, F. poae, and F. sporotrichioides, in oats.

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Subramani Natarajan, Diana Bucur, Steven Kildea, Fiona Doohan
{"title":"Digital PCR assays for quantifying trichothecene-producing Fusarium species, including Fusarium langsethiae, F. poae, and F. sporotrichioides, in oats.","authors":"Subramani Natarajan, Diana Bucur, Steven Kildea, Fiona Doohan","doi":"10.1007/s00216-025-05840-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fusarium fungi cause Fusarium head blight (FHB) in oats, reducing yield and contaminating grains with harmful trichothecene mycotoxins. FHB symptoms in oats are often not visually distinct, necessitating alternative detection methods. We developed digital PCR (dPCR) assays as the most accurate DNA-based method to detect trichothecene-producing Fusarium species commonly found in oats. Building on existing quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays, we developed dPCR assays targeting all trichothecene producers (the Tri5 gene), or specific to F. langsethiae (Fl), F. poae (Fp), and F. sporotrichioides (Fs). All targeted single copy genes, except F. poae which targeted rDNA which is a variable and multi-copy target (and hence not as reliable as the other assays for quantification). Optimized dPCR assays showed excellent linearity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99) and greater resilience than qPCR to varying oat DNA concentrations. Overall, when comparing assay sensitivity using both fungal and field oat DNA extracts, dPCR assays were superior to qPCR for Tri5, Fl, and Fs, but the converse was true for Fp. Performance comparisons using field samples showed moderate to perfect agreement between qPCR and dPCR for Tri5 and Fl (κ = 0.5 and 0.86) and poor agreement for Fp (κ = 0.00). Strong correlations were observed between the methods for Tri5, Fl, and Fp (r = 0.88-0.97), but unlike dPCR, qPCR did not detect Fs in any of the field samples. We conclude that the dPCR assays for Tri5, Fl, and Fs offer a reliable method for quantification while that for Fp is reliable for fungal detection but less reliable for quantification of the pathogen in field samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":462,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-025-05840-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fusarium fungi cause Fusarium head blight (FHB) in oats, reducing yield and contaminating grains with harmful trichothecene mycotoxins. FHB symptoms in oats are often not visually distinct, necessitating alternative detection methods. We developed digital PCR (dPCR) assays as the most accurate DNA-based method to detect trichothecene-producing Fusarium species commonly found in oats. Building on existing quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays, we developed dPCR assays targeting all trichothecene producers (the Tri5 gene), or specific to F. langsethiae (Fl), F. poae (Fp), and F. sporotrichioides (Fs). All targeted single copy genes, except F. poae which targeted rDNA which is a variable and multi-copy target (and hence not as reliable as the other assays for quantification). Optimized dPCR assays showed excellent linearity (R2 = 0.99) and greater resilience than qPCR to varying oat DNA concentrations. Overall, when comparing assay sensitivity using both fungal and field oat DNA extracts, dPCR assays were superior to qPCR for Tri5, Fl, and Fs, but the converse was true for Fp. Performance comparisons using field samples showed moderate to perfect agreement between qPCR and dPCR for Tri5 and Fl (κ = 0.5 and 0.86) and poor agreement for Fp (κ = 0.00). Strong correlations were observed between the methods for Tri5, Fl, and Fp (r = 0.88-0.97), but unlike dPCR, qPCR did not detect Fs in any of the field samples. We conclude that the dPCR assays for Tri5, Fl, and Fs offer a reliable method for quantification while that for Fp is reliable for fungal detection but less reliable for quantification of the pathogen in field samples.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
638
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry’s mission is the rapid publication of excellent and high-impact research articles on fundamental and applied topics of analytical and bioanalytical measurement science. Its scope is broad, and ranges from novel measurement platforms and their characterization to multidisciplinary approaches that effectively address important scientific problems. The Editors encourage submissions presenting innovative analytical research in concept, instrumentation, methods, and/or applications, including: mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, and electroanalysis; advanced separations; analytical strategies in “-omics” and imaging, bioanalysis, and sampling; miniaturized devices, medical diagnostics, sensors; analytical characterization of nano- and biomaterials; chemometrics and advanced data analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信