A Pilot Study to Evaluate Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in a Pediatric Cohort With Genodermatoses.

IF 1.7 4区 生物学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Sneha A Rangu, Kierstin Keller, Dong Li, Hope Thomas, Nora O'Connor, Abbas F Jawad, Allison Thomas, Nina H Thomas, Hakon Hakonarson, Leslie Castelo-Soccio, Sarah E Sheppard
{"title":"A Pilot Study to Evaluate Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in a Pediatric Cohort With Genodermatoses.","authors":"Sneha A Rangu, Kierstin Keller, Dong Li, Hope Thomas, Nora O'Connor, Abbas F Jawad, Allison Thomas, Nina H Thomas, Hakon Hakonarson, Leslie Castelo-Soccio, Sarah E Sheppard","doi":"10.1002/ajmg.a.63989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our study aimed to evaluate cognitive function in individuals with genetic skin disorders involving neuroectoderm (n = 8) compared to individuals with only ectoderm or mesoderm (n = 16) involvement. We hypothesized that neuroectodermal involvement would result in poorer neurocognitive performance. A prospective, cross-sectional pilot study of 24 participants evaluated cognition, adaptive skills, behavior, and quality of life (QoL) using neurodevelopmental tests. Participants' characteristics and outcomes of interest were summarized by standard descriptive statistics using means, standard deviation, median, and 95% confidence intervals. We found no differences between mean cognitive composite standard score, adaptive composite standard score, QoL raw score, or internalizing and externalizing behavior T-scores between the neuroectodermal group (82.3, 90.3, 70.3, and 50.0, respectively; average age = 7 years) and the ectodermal/mesodermal group (87.8, 96.4, 80.4, and 54.3, respectively; average age = 5.9 years). No differences were seen in neurodevelopmental functioning between both groups. Our pilot study presents a framework for utilizing neurocognitive testing in patients with genodermatoses. A limitation of our work is the high level of heterogeneity due to varying diagnoses seen in each group requiring larger sample sizes for determination of clinical significance. Future work is needed to include homogenous diagnoses and to evaluate the most efficacious interventions to maximize neurodevelopmental outcomes in individuals with genodermatoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":7507,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A","volume":" ","pages":"e63989"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.63989","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our study aimed to evaluate cognitive function in individuals with genetic skin disorders involving neuroectoderm (n = 8) compared to individuals with only ectoderm or mesoderm (n = 16) involvement. We hypothesized that neuroectodermal involvement would result in poorer neurocognitive performance. A prospective, cross-sectional pilot study of 24 participants evaluated cognition, adaptive skills, behavior, and quality of life (QoL) using neurodevelopmental tests. Participants' characteristics and outcomes of interest were summarized by standard descriptive statistics using means, standard deviation, median, and 95% confidence intervals. We found no differences between mean cognitive composite standard score, adaptive composite standard score, QoL raw score, or internalizing and externalizing behavior T-scores between the neuroectodermal group (82.3, 90.3, 70.3, and 50.0, respectively; average age = 7 years) and the ectodermal/mesodermal group (87.8, 96.4, 80.4, and 54.3, respectively; average age = 5.9 years). No differences were seen in neurodevelopmental functioning between both groups. Our pilot study presents a framework for utilizing neurocognitive testing in patients with genodermatoses. A limitation of our work is the high level of heterogeneity due to varying diagnoses seen in each group requiring larger sample sizes for determination of clinical significance. Future work is needed to include homogenous diagnoses and to evaluate the most efficacious interventions to maximize neurodevelopmental outcomes in individuals with genodermatoses.

一项评估遗传性皮肤病儿童队列神经发育结局的初步研究。
我们的研究旨在评估遗传性皮肤病累及神经外胚层的个体(n = 8)与仅累及外胚层或中胚层的个体(n = 16)的认知功能。我们假设神经外胚层受累会导致较差的神经认知表现。一项前瞻性、横断面试点研究,24名参与者使用神经发育测试评估认知、适应技能、行为和生活质量(QoL)。通过标准描述性统计,使用均值、标准差、中位数和95%置信区间对参与者的特征和结果进行总结。我们发现神经外胚层组的平均认知综合标准评分、适应性综合标准评分、生活质量原始评分或内化和外化行为t -评分之间没有差异(分别为82.3、90.3、70.3和50.0);平均年龄= 7岁)和外胚层/中胚层组(分别为87.8岁、96.4岁、80.4岁和54.3岁;平均年龄= 5.9岁)。两组之间的神经发育功能没有差异。我们的试点研究提出了一个框架,利用神经认知测试的遗传性皮肤病患者。我们工作的一个局限性是由于在每个组中看到不同的诊断结果,需要更大的样本量来确定临床意义,因此异质性水平很高。未来的工作需要包括同质诊断和评估最有效的干预措施,以最大限度地提高遗传皮肤病患者的神经发育结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
432
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medical Genetics - Part A (AJMG) gives you continuous coverage of all biological and medical aspects of genetic disorders and birth defects, as well as in-depth documentation of phenotype analysis within the current context of genotype/phenotype correlations. In addition to Part A , AJMG also publishes two other parts: Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics , covering experimental and clinical investigations of the genetic mechanisms underlying neurologic and psychiatric disorders. Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics , guest-edited collections of thematic reviews of topical interest to the readership of AJMG .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信