A Neutral Risk Framework for Active Participation Across the Lifespan: A Call to Action for Using Risk in Movement Contexts as a Tool for Human Flourishing
Melanie Stuckey, Brandy Tanenbaum, Dean Kriellaars
{"title":"A Neutral Risk Framework for Active Participation Across the Lifespan: A Call to Action for Using Risk in Movement Contexts as a Tool for Human Flourishing","authors":"Melanie Stuckey, Brandy Tanenbaum, Dean Kriellaars","doi":"10.1007/s40279-025-02199-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traditional risk management approaches focus on the prevention of negative short-term physical outcomes, such as injury. While the relationship between risk and harm has been useful for reducing workplace and transport injuries, it is inappropriate in movement contexts such as sport, leisure and education, where engagement with risk can be an important contributor to healthy human development and flourishing across the lifespan. We propose a neutral definition of risk informed by the 2009 International Organization for Standardization as the basis of a framework to support a rational approach to decision making around risk in movement contexts. The framework proposed herein considers the probability of all potential outcomes (positive, neutral, or negative) that could impact human development across the lifespan. Viewpoints from multiple timepoints (immediate to multi-generational) and levels (participant(s), proximal observers, local community, society) are included. The framework proposes two outcome streams: physical and psychosocial to avoid the pitfalls of a singular focus. The perception of risk is an individual experience that is subject to interpretation; as such, stakeholders relevant to the activity under consideration and representative of the intersectional identities of the community in which it takes place should be included in the process. This framework provides a rational approach for movement communities to adopt adequate safety practices (as opposed to surplus safety) in the creation and ongoing maintenance of movement opportunities that support flourishing for all.</p>","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-025-02199-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Traditional risk management approaches focus on the prevention of negative short-term physical outcomes, such as injury. While the relationship between risk and harm has been useful for reducing workplace and transport injuries, it is inappropriate in movement contexts such as sport, leisure and education, where engagement with risk can be an important contributor to healthy human development and flourishing across the lifespan. We propose a neutral definition of risk informed by the 2009 International Organization for Standardization as the basis of a framework to support a rational approach to decision making around risk in movement contexts. The framework proposed herein considers the probability of all potential outcomes (positive, neutral, or negative) that could impact human development across the lifespan. Viewpoints from multiple timepoints (immediate to multi-generational) and levels (participant(s), proximal observers, local community, society) are included. The framework proposes two outcome streams: physical and psychosocial to avoid the pitfalls of a singular focus. The perception of risk is an individual experience that is subject to interpretation; as such, stakeholders relevant to the activity under consideration and representative of the intersectional identities of the community in which it takes place should be included in the process. This framework provides a rational approach for movement communities to adopt adequate safety practices (as opposed to surplus safety) in the creation and ongoing maintenance of movement opportunities that support flourishing for all.
期刊介绍:
Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports.
Types of Articles:
Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings.
Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field.
Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles.
Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content.
Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances.
Peer Review Process:
All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.