Exploring currently available fibroblast activation protein targeting molecules in adrenocortical carcinoma: Navigating theranostic pathways

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Sejal Chopra, Jaya Shukla, Priyavrat Purohit, Umanath Adhikari, Frank Roesch, Euy Sung Moon, Yogesh Rathore, Nivedita Rana, Sanjay Kumar Bhadada, Bhagwant Rai Mittal, Rama Walia
{"title":"Exploring currently available fibroblast activation protein targeting molecules in adrenocortical carcinoma: Navigating theranostic pathways","authors":"Sejal Chopra, Jaya Shukla, Priyavrat Purohit, Umanath Adhikari, Frank Roesch, Euy Sung Moon, Yogesh Rathore, Nivedita Rana, Sanjay Kumar Bhadada, Bhagwant Rai Mittal, Rama Walia","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07203-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) expressing fibroblast activation protein (FAP) in the adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) microenvironment may be used as potential therapeutic targets. This study investigated the diagnostic potential of four FAPi derivatives i.e. DOTA-FAPi-46 (FAPi46), DOTA.SA.FAPi (SA.FAPi), DATA<sup>5m</sup><sub>.</sub>SA.FAPi (DATA.FAPi) and DATA<sup>5m</sup><sub>.</sub>C4.FAPi (C4.FAPi) and compared with standard-of-care <sup>18</sup>F-FDG (FDG) in ACC.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Thirty histopathological proven cases of localized or metastatic ACC were recruited for both FDG and FAPi PET (number of patients (n) = 5 for SA.FAPi, n = 5 for DATA.FAPi, n = 5 for C4.FAPi and n = 15 for FAPi46). For biodistribution, standardized uptake values (SUV’s) were computed by delineating region-of-interest on various body organs. For comparative analysis in disease identification, lesion tracer uptake was quantified using standardized uptake values corrected for lean body mass (SUL), tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), total lesion glycolysis (TLG for FDG) and total lesion FAP expression (TLF for FAPi).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>In overall analysis, both FAPi and FDG PET exhibited comparable mean SUL<sub>peak</sub> [FAPi 4.3 (8.0–1.7) vs FDG 3.9 (8.1–2.5), p-0.271], mean SUL<sub>avg</sub> [2.2 (4.3–1.2) vs 2.2 (3.4–1.3), p-0.897] and mean TBR [1.8 (3.2–1.2) vs 1.9 (2.7–1.2), p-0.696]. In volumetric analysis, comparable mean TLF and mean TLG was noted for the cohort [9.3 (53.7–4.5) vs 11.8 (33.0–4.3), p-0.107]. Sub-categorical analysis demonstrated complete concordant findings for both radiotracers in detection of all primary lesions, nodal lesions and distant metastases in lung and peritoneum with discordant findings in liver (22%) and skeletal lesions (33%). For lesion detection, DATA.FAPi and FAPi46 showed 100% concordance with FDG scan findings in metastatic disease. SA.FAPi exhibited 33% discordance by detecting an additional skeletal lesion, while C4.FAPi had 10% discordance, missing one liver lesion identified by FDG. Three <sup>68</sup> Ga-FAP derivatives (SA.FAPi, DATA.FAPi, and C4.FAPi) exhibited similar biodistribution, with uptake in the salivary glands, thyroid, liver, pancreas, muscles, and kidneys, and variable uptake in the lacrimal glands, extra-ocular muscles, oral mucosa, and uterus. In contrast, FAPi46 physiological expression was noted in salivary glands and muscles, with no uptake in other organs. Pancreatic uptake was highest for SA.FAPi (SUVmean 11.8), DATA.FAPi (12.1), and C4.FAPi (10.8), while FAPi46 had the lowest (1.7). Conversely, FAPi46 exhibited the highest muscle uptake (SUVmean 4.3) compared to SA.FAPi (1.7), DATA.FAPi (1.4), and C4.FAPi (1.0).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>All the existing FAP inhibitor molecules were comparable to FDG PET for mapping disease spread and appeared as potential theranostic targets for the management of ACC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07203-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) expressing fibroblast activation protein (FAP) in the adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) microenvironment may be used as potential therapeutic targets. This study investigated the diagnostic potential of four FAPi derivatives i.e. DOTA-FAPi-46 (FAPi46), DOTA.SA.FAPi (SA.FAPi), DATA5m.SA.FAPi (DATA.FAPi) and DATA5m.C4.FAPi (C4.FAPi) and compared with standard-of-care 18F-FDG (FDG) in ACC.

Methods

Thirty histopathological proven cases of localized or metastatic ACC were recruited for both FDG and FAPi PET (number of patients (n) = 5 for SA.FAPi, n = 5 for DATA.FAPi, n = 5 for C4.FAPi and n = 15 for FAPi46). For biodistribution, standardized uptake values (SUV’s) were computed by delineating region-of-interest on various body organs. For comparative analysis in disease identification, lesion tracer uptake was quantified using standardized uptake values corrected for lean body mass (SUL), tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), total lesion glycolysis (TLG for FDG) and total lesion FAP expression (TLF for FAPi).

Results

In overall analysis, both FAPi and FDG PET exhibited comparable mean SULpeak [FAPi 4.3 (8.0–1.7) vs FDG 3.9 (8.1–2.5), p-0.271], mean SULavg [2.2 (4.3–1.2) vs 2.2 (3.4–1.3), p-0.897] and mean TBR [1.8 (3.2–1.2) vs 1.9 (2.7–1.2), p-0.696]. In volumetric analysis, comparable mean TLF and mean TLG was noted for the cohort [9.3 (53.7–4.5) vs 11.8 (33.0–4.3), p-0.107]. Sub-categorical analysis demonstrated complete concordant findings for both radiotracers in detection of all primary lesions, nodal lesions and distant metastases in lung and peritoneum with discordant findings in liver (22%) and skeletal lesions (33%). For lesion detection, DATA.FAPi and FAPi46 showed 100% concordance with FDG scan findings in metastatic disease. SA.FAPi exhibited 33% discordance by detecting an additional skeletal lesion, while C4.FAPi had 10% discordance, missing one liver lesion identified by FDG. Three 68 Ga-FAP derivatives (SA.FAPi, DATA.FAPi, and C4.FAPi) exhibited similar biodistribution, with uptake in the salivary glands, thyroid, liver, pancreas, muscles, and kidneys, and variable uptake in the lacrimal glands, extra-ocular muscles, oral mucosa, and uterus. In contrast, FAPi46 physiological expression was noted in salivary glands and muscles, with no uptake in other organs. Pancreatic uptake was highest for SA.FAPi (SUVmean 11.8), DATA.FAPi (12.1), and C4.FAPi (10.8), while FAPi46 had the lowest (1.7). Conversely, FAPi46 exhibited the highest muscle uptake (SUVmean 4.3) compared to SA.FAPi (1.7), DATA.FAPi (1.4), and C4.FAPi (1.0).

Conclusion

All the existing FAP inhibitor molecules were comparable to FDG PET for mapping disease spread and appeared as potential theranostic targets for the management of ACC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信