The Relation Between Spontaneous Focusing on Numerosity and Mathematics Performance: A Meta-Analysis

IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Xiangyu Li, Boby Ho-Hong Ching, Lihua Tan, Xiaofei Li, Jiajia Li, Tiffany Ting Chen
{"title":"The Relation Between Spontaneous Focusing on Numerosity and Mathematics Performance: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Xiangyu Li, Boby Ho-Hong Ching, Lihua Tan, Xiaofei Li, Jiajia Li, Tiffany Ting Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10648-025-10007-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Substantial research has explored the connection between children’s spontaneous focusing on numerosity (SFON) and their current and later mathematical achievement. However, the findings have been inconsistent, and no comprehensive investigation has yet been conducted. This meta-analysis examines the relation between SFON and mathematics performance in preschool and school-age students and identifies potential moderators, including SFON measurement methods, SFON scoring methods, number size in SFON tasks, domains of mathematics skills, temporal relations, time lags, and age. Based on 171 effect sizes from 35 independent samples, involving 6604 participants across 29 studies, results revealed a significant positive correlation between SFON and mathematics performance (<i>r</i> = .274), with bidirectionality and longitudinal stability. The correlation remained significant after controlling for working memory, nonverbal intelligence, and inhibition, respectively. Moderation analyses showed stronger correlations with mathematics performance for behavioral-based tasks and scoring methods that consider both accuracy and quantifying acts. SFON tasks involving smaller numbers (less than ten) yielded stronger correlations with mathematics performance. Temporal relations emerged as a significant moderator, with a stronger longitudinal link from mathematics performance to SFON compared to the reverse. Age was another significant moderator, with the link strengthening with age. Interaction effects among moderators were also observed. Theoretical implications of these findings regarding the SFON-mathematics performance relation are discussed, and practical implications for comprehensive assessment of children’s SFON.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"287 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10007-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Substantial research has explored the connection between children’s spontaneous focusing on numerosity (SFON) and their current and later mathematical achievement. However, the findings have been inconsistent, and no comprehensive investigation has yet been conducted. This meta-analysis examines the relation between SFON and mathematics performance in preschool and school-age students and identifies potential moderators, including SFON measurement methods, SFON scoring methods, number size in SFON tasks, domains of mathematics skills, temporal relations, time lags, and age. Based on 171 effect sizes from 35 independent samples, involving 6604 participants across 29 studies, results revealed a significant positive correlation between SFON and mathematics performance (r = .274), with bidirectionality and longitudinal stability. The correlation remained significant after controlling for working memory, nonverbal intelligence, and inhibition, respectively. Moderation analyses showed stronger correlations with mathematics performance for behavioral-based tasks and scoring methods that consider both accuracy and quantifying acts. SFON tasks involving smaller numbers (less than ten) yielded stronger correlations with mathematics performance. Temporal relations emerged as a significant moderator, with a stronger longitudinal link from mathematics performance to SFON compared to the reverse. Age was another significant moderator, with the link strengthening with age. Interaction effects among moderators were also observed. Theoretical implications of these findings regarding the SFON-mathematics performance relation are discussed, and practical implications for comprehensive assessment of children’s SFON.

自发专注于数字与数学成绩之间的关系:元分析
大量研究探索了儿童自发关注数数(SFON)与他们当前和以后的数学成就之间的联系。然而,调查结果并不一致,尚未进行全面调查。本meta分析探讨了SFON与学龄前和学龄学生数学成绩之间的关系,并确定了潜在的调节因素,包括SFON测量方法、SFON评分方法、SFON任务的数量大小、数学技能领域、时间关系、时间滞后和年龄。基于来自35个独立样本的171个效应量,涉及29项研究的6604名参与者,结果显示SFON与数学成绩之间存在显著的正相关(r = 0.274),且具有双向性和纵向稳定性。在分别控制了工作记忆、非语言智力和抑制后,相关性仍然显著。适度分析显示,基于行为的任务和考虑准确性和量化行为的评分方法与数学表现之间存在更强的相关性。涉及较小数字(小于10)的SFON任务与数学表现的相关性更强。时间关系是一个重要的调节因素,与相反的情况相比,数学成绩与son之间有更强的纵向联系。年龄是另一个重要的调节因素,这种联系随着年龄的增长而增强。调节因子之间的交互效应也被观察到。本文讨论了这些研究结果对小学生数学成绩关系的理论意义,以及对儿童小学生数学成绩综合评价的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Psychology Review
Educational Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Educational Psychology Review aims to disseminate knowledge and promote dialogue within the field of educational psychology. It serves as a platform for the publication of various types of articles, including peer-reviewed integrative reviews, special thematic issues, reflections on previous research or new research directions, interviews, and research-based advice for practitioners. The journal caters to a diverse readership, ranging from generalists in educational psychology to experts in specific areas of the discipline. The content offers a comprehensive coverage of topics and provides in-depth information to meet the needs of both specialized researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信